Imgflip Logo Icon

It's hard to design a bailout bill that doesn't benefit big business in the end, but the Covid-19 relief bills did a decent job.

It's hard to design a bailout bill that doesn't benefit big business in the end, but the Covid-19 relief bills did a decent job. | image tagged in government,covid-19,coronavirus,business,economy,economics | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
250 views 4 upvotes Made by KylieFan_89 5 years ago in politics
11 Comments
1 up, 5y
This time, Congress has made efforts to write in "small businesses" into these bailout bills. But government bailouts by their very nature always seem to favor large companies that are better-connected politically, and better-positioned legally, to take advantage of them.

Not sure what to do about that, except to continue to improve the drafting of these bailout bills.

Because as much as we might despise them, the bailouts are necessary at this point in time to keep the economy on life support.

Side-note: The expanded unemployment insurance provisions, paid family/medial leave, and "helicopter money" relief checks sent to most Americans were well-designed to help average people.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Change My Mind Meme | There should be no bailouts, and we shouldn't he shutting down the economy | image tagged in memes,change my mind | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
Change My Mind Meme | Well, most folks aren't with you. | image tagged in memes,change my mind | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ap-norc-poll-few-americans-support-easing-virus-protections/ar-BB132Vjg?ocid=spartanntp

"Despite pockets of attention-grabbing protests, a new survey finds Americans remain overwhelmingly in favor of stay-at-home orders and other efforts to slow the spread of the coronavirus. A majority say it won’t be safe to lift such restrictions anytime soon, even as a handful of governors announce plans to ease within days the public health efforts that have upended daily life and roiled the global economy...

"About 8 in 10 Americans say they support measures that include requiring Americans to stay in their homes and limiting gatherings to 10 people or fewer — numbers that have largely held steady over the past few weeks."
0 ups, 5y
Well polling also shows most americans are concerned about losing income they than they are about the virus and losing their health.

So....

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/poll-during-coronavirus-us-far-more-worried-about-personal-finances
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
So lift the lockdowns and those who want to go to work can go to work, and the others who are scared can stay home voluntarily.

I don't have to live in fear because you're a little scwared
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Ice Cube It's All Good In the Hood | image tagged in ice cube it's all good in the hood | made w/ Imgflip meme maker


I'm a 30 year old dude in good health. I'm not afraid of a virus, either. Neither is my wife. But we have a larger sphere of concern than ourselves.

We're doing a'ight: We've actually been enjoying the extra time together. If you know what I mean.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
So stay home. You don't have the right to dictate the actions of others on the basis of "what I'm doing is right"
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I don't, but our elected leaders do. See, without limitation: 10th Amendment, police power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_power_(United_States_constitutional_law)

To wit: "In United States constitutional law, police power is the capacity of the states to regulate behavior and enforce order within their territory for the betterment of the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of their inhabitants."
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yes, and guess what, jackass, state officials are opening states. And why is it the states with lockdowns never tried to mandate people stay in doors? It's because police power has limits.

Reading Constitution Law is over your head.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yes, the police power has its limits. But what are those limits in a situation like this?

In fact, states may have been able to order their citizens to completely stay indoors, but simply chose not to. We don’t really know. This situation is unprecedented, which means there is not a single case directly on point.

A total stay-at-home order would have been tough to enforce, anyway, and would have resulted in much bigger and earlier political pushback. No one here is in favor of a China-style lockdown — which would have meant something like one person in the home gets to venture out every three days solely for the purpose of getting food. That would never fly here. Americans love their freedom too much.

Yes, now some governors are announcing they will re-open their states within the next few weeks. Will they, in the end? We’ll see. Remember Trump said he wanted America open for business by Easter, then backed off that (not that he has the constitutional ability to make that call anyway).

In most cases, it appears governors will be going against the will of their citizens, which means a lot of people may stay home anyway as you suggest.

Whatever state governors have to say about this, cities, businesses, and individuals will still get to decide what to do.

If it’s true that states can’t force people to stay home, as you say, then states certainly can’t force people to get out and about, either.
0 ups, 5y
"If it’s true that states can’t force people to stay home, as you say, then states certainly can’t force people to get out and about, either."

SO STAY HOME IF YOU WANT TO...are you really this dense? I said this three comments ago.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator