He saw the signs. He tried to warn us... and now... WE’RE DEAD!

A message from the Lord!

I can hear this playing in my head.

well china didn't listen.

salmonella? that's pigs off that list

Don't get me started on Salmonella, they already got Cheese Nips, Ritz, and cake mixes recalled

unimportant but quick question: am i losing that arguement at the bottom of the page?

lol we have this movie on DVD. Awesome meme😂👍👌! When I read it I couldn't help singing the tune!

Dude, I just came across my old VHS copy!

our dvd of jonah was ruined so i haven't watched it since i was four

Bummer

pigs are okay, everyone eats their meat, which is pork.

sAlMoNelLa

Pretty sure that salmonella comes from undercooked meat. But I could be wrong.

it's a bacteria

nice jonah

But what is thought to have started the outbreak is a pangolin being bitten buy a bat and people ate the meat (which they should never do with a pangolins) but people think it may be different.

heehee

Why did COVID-19 happen

dogs too also cats horses and every other animal except chicken, cows, pigs, fish.

Quick! Delete this before That Vegan Teacher uses it as a weapon!

And guess what happend...

But... bacon exists

Yes but actually no. If you are dumb enough to believe that coronavirus strains that affect humans, which are prevalent around the world and cause colds every winter, could somehow originate from some deep fried bats and spread around the world, then you probably believe HIV/AIDS came from infected monkeys in Africa.

Buddy, calling it coronavirus is very broad. The term coronavirus is a family of viruses that include but aren't limited to, the common cold, SARS, MERS. These are all respiratory diseases, SARS and
MERS actually came from animals, believe it or not. If you try and make a comeback to this comment, please remember that all of this came from the WHO (World Health Organisation). Now whether or not if COVID-19 came from bats is debatable.

Yeah, no kidding, it's common knowledge. WHO suspects not confirms SARS came from bats. SARS and MERS are statistically insignificant, each with less than 1,000 deaths. The "new" coronavirus is just a new strain and not a new disease. It's common for people around the world to be infected with them. Not a pandemic. More of a planned panic.

I do enjoy the fact that you look at the big picture here. Even with less than one thousand deaths for each of those diseases, imagine the amount of families who had to suffer their family members deaths. Also, technically speaking COVID-19 is a pandemic according to WHO. If you wish to say that the cold is more common than COVID-19, remember, it isn't a pandemic because we are used to it. Now of course if China told the truth, we would be all safe. And yes, seeing how bats are common fare near the epicenter's location, it isn't far fetched to think that this virus could come from an animal. But I still don't think COVID-19 was from bats. It was also confirmed by the WHO that MERS, came from camels. I say camels because MERS stands for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.

You want big picture? Bill Gates has publicly said he wants to vaccinate 7 billion people for coronavirus. He is the 2nd largest funder of the WHO, more than every other country except the USA, he is pouring billions into 7 factories which are mass producing them. He has funded the Dr Fucci or whatever his name is for years, and wants to permanently track those who have been injected, including scannable nanodots left on skin as proof. About 7 months ago he ran Event 201, a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic.

I'm all fairness, good job. But doesn't it seem strange that 7 months ago, there was a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic. And then in December of 2019, look what new stain of pathogen came along. And I told you the big picture only plays it right with certain people, i.e Bill Gates. But those who see people worried about this virus, like me, feel that whatever Bill Gates is doing is ok. But at the end of the day, I don't care. If you don't live with those who are suseptible, then you too won't care that much because you look at Bill Gates or someone else, without looking at yourself. In fact here is a suggestion, donate to the CDC foundation. Who knows, with those dollars you donated, it could find the cure.

Buddy that was a joke. The rest wasn't.

Yeah it's ok. He thinks he knows it all. He hasn't even responded to my latest reply. I think he lost.

This is the reply for your latest comment. Yes that is absolutely accurate. In fact, when he was trying to make points. I bet he only took 3 minutes to reaserch it.

What? Donate to the CDC? Those rich f**kers have the biggest conflict of interest. They hold patents on the vaccines and meds they are supposed to neutrally approve. They end up sitting on boards of big pharma as a payoff. When Donald Rumsfeld "lobbied" CDC to get aspartame approved, even though they knew it caused holes in the brains of lab mice, a few of the people there that actually had some ethics left resigned. They add the deaths from pneumonia to flu deaths to make it appear the flu is more dangerous than it, to increase flu shots, even though they admit on their website that the shots are useless.

Ok first off, even though mice are mammals, their anatomy are way too different with humans. Lab rat tests are in a sense, useless. The only reason they do it is because it's cheap and it makes the testing last longer. They only have the conflict of interest in the USA. Also, I'll have you know that Microsoft, owned by Bill Gates, who you so value, actually let's people donate to the CDC. And no, the CDC makes immunization guidelines and let's the reach of the 50 started build up on that. And the flu kills people with pnumonia. So please, learn the anatomy of the lab rat, and the human anatomy.

Sorry that's supposed to say "each" instead of "reach"

Please explain why you replied.

All this information is groundbreaking to me. Besides, I wasn't just replying to you, it was towards everybody who replied above.

No no, I understand. I'm happy that you learned something from this argument.

Where what came from? HIV/AIDS? There is no such thing. HIV virus has never been isolated in a microscope and HIV tests only detect common antibodies, not any such thing as an HIV virus. Even the fraud who claimed to discover it begrudgingly admitted you can have full recovery. A far cry from the phony claim it somehow stays in your body for decades and can become "AIDS" at any time.

The fact is this phenomenon only affects people who routinely engage in anal sex and/or share infected drug needles. It's such a strain on the immune system the body starts breaking down. Yet despite obvious symptoms some continue that behavior until they die. If they stop they have a good chance of recovery.

If you have pneumonia and test positive on the HIV test that doesn't really detect HIV, you are called an AIDS patient. If negative, a pneumonia patient. There is no actual new virus or disease called HIV/AIDS. It's just a relabeling.

Then you should have no trouble collecting tens of thousands of dollars with your bullshit photo.

https://crazzfiles.com/hiv-has-never-been-isolated-and-does-not-even-exist/

https://www.altheal.org/isolation/isolhiv.htm

I love getting boilerplate Wikipedia responses from mooks like you, it just helps bring more and more information to the public.

You just put up photo of what you claimed was HIV with no reference. So f**k off.

Clearly you have done no research on this subject.

"False. You're called someone who tested positive for HIV and has pneumonia."

Absolutely WRONG.

"Because HIV infection produces a wide range of symptoms, the CDC has compiled a list of conditions regarded as defining AIDS. The physician will use the CDC list to decide whether the patient falls into one of these three groups:
-definitive diagnoses with or without laboratory evidence of HIV infection
-definitive diagnoses with laboratory evidence of HIV infection
-presumptive diagnoses with laboratory evidence of HIV infection."

So a positive HIV test CAN be used to define AIDS according to the CDC.

Today, the diagnosis of "AIDS" is made whenever any of 25 different disease symptoms appear in the presence of active HIV or HIV antibody. If they display symptoms and have traces of HIV in their blood, the physicians says they have "AIDS"; if no traces of HIV are found, they are diagnosed as having one or more of those original 25 diseases.

Obviously that's according to the standard diagnosis used, as based on the blood test that doesn't actually detect HIV, and was never designed to do so.

There are huge medical debates that have been going on for decades about this. There are debates going on in the medical community about the nature of cancer.

Just because you are ignorant of it is no reason to grandstand about what you think you know.

Generally, heterosexual promiscuousness has no correlation to AIDS, and itself is not a risk factor. Studies of prostitutes in Nevada brothels, which forbid anal intercourse or the use of drugs, demonstrate the absence of HIV infection or AIDS-like symptoms. However, street prostitutes in large cities, such as New York, are often found to suffer immune system damage, not from sexual promiscuity, but rather from drug usage, malnutrition, and other factors related to life on the streets. Drug usage and associated malnutrition is also the mechanism for immune system depletion among groups whose "risk factor" is often, for lack of information, mis-identified as simply "heterosexual HIV transmission". These groups include lower-income inner city populations with higher levels of drug usage, malnutrition, and other immune-damaging correlations.

it did come from bats, most reliable media says so

Yeah, some media did say that. The second part of that statement does not prove the first.

search up "did the corona virus come from bats"

I read all that. Bats, some said then to snakes. Not bat soup, bats. Yadda yadda yadda. Sketchy at best.

just about every link that had the word science in their name said bat

What a sweet kid. So you believe everything you read if it has a link and claims to be scientific. Make sure to load up on statins, aspartame, and don't forget your flu shot, and be first in line for CV vaccine so that bat virus doesn't get ya!

where do you get your information from? BBC?, they have been known to lie, i bet you also believe the virus was created in a lab which has already been proven to be false, and apart from vaccines "sir" i have gotten my shot and am healthy unlike you

You are a mess. So BBC lies but other MSM don't? Weak attempt to redirect about "what I believe" with pure guessing games. Fail! Nice anecdote. The CDC admits that the flu shot is absolutely useless.....so if you are healthy as you claim it has nothing to do with that.

well i didn't say only BBC, i just said BBC without mentioning the other news channels that lie, they didn't say it is useless, they just said it's not as useful as it used to, vaccines are supposed to help by sending a weaker strain of the flu into your body, then your body slowly becomes immune, not completely immune but more immune than you were when you were a kid, that's why babies need more shots, however you still need to get a flu shot since the flu could still infect you.

it's what school taught me, besides if you are quick to call someone dumb because you can't understand a joke then you are probably way dumber

Sad to hear your complete lack of understanding of how the human immune system works.