Free Campaign Publicity

You have no idea what censorship is. It is the government turning off a reporter's microphone because they don't like that she is quoting what he is on the record saying. I just said to label the event properly and not give the Trump campaign free airtime. If news happens to come up, mixed in with the congratulatory messages from toadies, for almost doing his job, they should report it. By the way, your obsession with me resembles an addiction. The first step is admitting that you have a problem.

The definition of censorship is as follows:

the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security.

You are actively calling for the suppression of presidential broadcasts until they meet your subjective standards.

I did not suggest thaat the events could not or should not be staged or broadcast. I just said that they should not be labeled news, whit is clearly a campaign event. There was even reporting from inside the White House that these events were seen by Trump as replacements for his "rallies." So, he sees them the same way I do. I think news organizations have a responsibility to report on political campaigns, so that we can make informed choices. I am just opposed to propaganda being labeled as news.

"Stop Live Broadcast".....

That does not suppress the information, nor does it call for it to be. It just relegates it to a level appropriate for its collective newswrothiness. Trump should have to pay for publicity about his endorsements from the Republican business community.

STOP. LIVE. BROADCAST = CENSORSHIP

No matter how many times you say it, you are wrong. The information would still be avilable for all who wish to see and hear it. It would just cease to be Republican Campaign propaganda, disguised as a news event related to an international disaster.

Your conflating eliminating information with supressing it. Suppression is what you are advocating for.

You're an idiot.

The Wall Street Journal agrees with me. See their editorial of April 9, 2020 on this subject. It appears that I might be conservative, or right. The editorial makes all of your remarks appear more trollish than when you first posted them. How does a troll react when Rupert Murdoch's prize publication and Larry Caird are on the same page. I suspect we will find out.