Donald Trump Clown

On a relative basis, isn't 500 cases close to nothing?

So maybe he shouldnt have said, Shut down, or we stopped it, its a hoax, it was developed to hurt the US economy and my reelection??

He didn't say the virus was a hoax. He said the media panic around the virus was a hoax. And you could say people are using the panic to hurt Trump's re-election.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. If you voted for this clown- enjoy the circus- and ignore the CDC- Dumpfy has "hunches"
Trump claimed that the WHO estimate was "false," citing a "hunch" he had.
Trump said the number of cases "within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero. That's a pretty good job we've done."
"We're going very substantially down, not up," Trump added.
Dumpfy suggested that coronavirus cases will decrease as the weather warms up, similar to the flu every spring.
- all this from a very stable genius that claims windmills cause cancer!

I believe Trump said the death rate was lower than what W.H.O. was saying...and there is this

"Trump is not quite the person I would call upon for insight into matters relating to virology. He does, of course, have a reputation for shooting from the hip, yet his reasoning on this is more sound than many of his critics would admit. Indeed, the WHO itself was at pains to stress that it’s 3.4 percent figure was not really an accurate mortality rate — it is simply the number of deaths divided by the number of confirmed cases. The problem is that while deaths from coronavirus are almost certain to be recorded, many mild cases of the disease will not have found their way into official figures. Some people, who suffer no more than the effects of a cold, may not even suspect they have the disease. Others may wonder whether they have it, but will self-isolate and not report their condition to a doctor."

"Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College was on the radio in Britain on Thursday making exactly this point. Referring to the outbreak in Italy he said: ‘for every person who dies we think there might be 100 or over 200 people infected.’ If he is right, that would give a death rate of one percent or less — exactly as Trump has claimed. Another guide is a Chinese report last week which claimed that the death rate from Covid-19 in Hubei province has been 2.9 percent, but outside Hubei province the death rate was only 0.4 percent. Again, you wonder how many of the early sufferers of the disease – who contracted it before it was identified as a novel virus — were aware of what they had contracted, which might explain why the measured death rate in Hubei Province, where the disease began, is so much higher."

once again, we see liberals appear to just be over reacting to Trump and the way he speaks, but you don't really examine what he is saying and if there are professionals who are saying similar things.

https://spectator.us/donald-trump-hunch-coronavirus-likely-correct/

so his hunch on windmills? fact or fiction?
Why did he cancel his trip to the CDC when they thought they had a confirmed case, then when they found out it wasnt, he changed his mind? Its just a cold, right.

Stay on topic. Windmills have nothing to do with this.

Its just one of his "hunches" that he thinks is real. I'd keep getting my updates from him, he knows best, and you are part of this CULT-45

One his hunches shared by professionals?

Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College was on the radio in Britain on Thursday making exactly this point. Referring to the outbreak in Italy he said: ‘for every person who dies we think there might be 100 or over 200 people infected.’ If he is right, that would give a death rate of one percent or less — exactly as Trump has claimed. Another guide is a Chinese report last week which claimed that the death rate from Covid-19 in Hubei province has been 2.9 percent, but outside Hubei province the death rate was only 0.4 percent. Again, you wonder how many of the early sufferers of the disease – who contracted it before it was identified as a novel virus — were aware of what they had contracted, which might explain why the measured death rate in Hubei Province, where the disease began, is so much higher