Robert Mueller

Hahahaha, I guess you didn't watch his Congressional testimony then. The guy barely knew his own name. I think they picked him because his dementia would keep him out of the way.

They picked him because he was a presecutor with an impeccable record of fairness. By the way, he was picked by Republicans.

maybe if they'd heard him speak they would have chosen more wisely. He was a bumbling fool in his testimony.

The guy didn't know who Fusion GPS was, or Christopher Steele, had never heard of the Dossier - the very items that triggered the investigation, the head of the investigation never heard of.

B-U-M-B-L-I-N-G F-O-O-L

if you were part of a conspiracy or a coup, would you say "You are damn right
i tried to destroy Trump and I'm damn proud of it" Of course not.

Many of us thought Mueller was a stand up guy, then we find out he signed a FISA warrant, and knew nothing of the goings of of his own investigation. The only reason he fired Strzok was because his emails were exposing him to be a Trump hater

In a world where leaks are common, there is always someone who wants to "tell it all." So, if this was a sham and all the people who were put behind bars were railroaded, the line of "Whistle Blowers," would be long. I only suggest that we use common sense. The reason these people were indicted is that law enforcemnt professionals found evidence that they committed crimes, lawyers presented this evidence in the form of criminal complaints which held up to the examination of Grand Juries. The lawyers then presented all the evidence and testimony that supported these complaints to independent juries. The plaintiff's lawyers did the same. Juries found most of the charges to be valid. Other accused people chose to plead guilty. That required that they admit under oath to committing all the crimes they pled guilty to, and describe in detail how they did their crimes. You would think that people who thought this was wrong or a conspiracy would have opted out and spoken out. They did not.

but it did not happen like that. FBI on two occasionssaid Flynn did not lie, then later their statement was changed. Flynn accepted the plea under duress in order to save his son from a trumped up charge. The mission, put everyone that knew Trump in prison until the roll over on him. By your logic, those about to get jail time should have rolled over on Trump. But Trump did nothing wrong, so they indicted Russians without any proof knowing they would never go to court to build a "preponderanceof evidence" that where there is smoke there is fire and Trump must be guilty by association

Prove it.

that is like trying to get the CIA to admit anything. there is lots of prove, but the wheels of jusice grind slowly. I am not going to dig up the details proving my case because the whole story comes in parts with different stories telling the parts. Enjoy your fantasy. I've wasted enough time on your silliest of memes.

My logic is that people just did their jobs. The fact is that Mr. Flynn (he no longer deserves the respect of being called General) either lied when he said he did not do the things he pled guilty to, or he lied under oath, commiting multiple counts of Felony Perjury. If his lawyers were the least bit competent, they would never allow an innocent person to allocute in a Federal Courtroom to crimes he did not commit. Your version requires too many people doing things that are illegal or so unusual that they would never do them, just to "get," an innocent president. That only happens in bad movies.