If guilty requires 2/3, exonoration should also. I'd maybe consider him exonorated if the jury had gone 2/3 for acquittal. It's a hung jury as far as I'm concerned.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
And your opinion doesn't matter fortunately...
It could be 0% convict and you'd imagine he was guilty...
You're basically correct. It is extremely hard to show a politician innocent or guilty; his supporters will always believe he is innocent, and his detractors that he is guilty. Remember Benghazi?
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
And still your President until January 20, 2025. So buckle up, Buttercup.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
The burden is to prove someone guilty. House FAILED miserably trying to do that since, ya know, all the evidence shows he wasn’t.
Caption this Meme
