Even if “life begins at conception,” that’s not the end of the analysis. Because the rights of another human are involved.

AN INTERESTING QUESTION, BUT NOT EXACTLY THE RIGHT ONE. A MORE PRECISE QUESTION FOR PURPOSES OF THE ABORTION DISCUSSION IS THIS: AT WHAT POINT DOES A FETUS’S RIGHT TO LIVE OVERCOME THE MOTHER’S OWN RIGHT TO REFUSE TO USE HER OWN WOMB FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUSTAINING IT? PERSONALLY, I AM COMFORTABLE DRAWING THAT LINE ANYWHERE BETWEEN THE POINT OF FETAL “VIABILITY” AND BIRTH. WHICH IS WHAT ROE V. WADE SAYS.