Hide the Pain Harold

Gotta love those opinion pieces from Washington Examiner.

Oh so true!

Spend some time researching the USCRN (US Climate Reference Network) set up by NOAA.

It's been running since 2005, and it was created to be the benchmark by which the larger weather station network can be compared. The reason NOAA created it is that the existing network of weather stations seems to have been sabotaged. Many weather stations are not up-to-spec. Some are installed near heat sources (air conditioners, in the middle of parking lots), some are on inconsistent power (causing outages that result in using averaged data from surrounding weather stations), some are even painted dark colors (which increase their temperature).

The USCRN has been monitored since 2005 and has shown no increase in temperature.

I'd trust NOAA raw data before I trust any textbook.

NASA, National Geographic, 97% of all scientists, and every academic textbook disagrees with you. Your comment just proves how dumb Trump supporters are. Your moronic ignorance is staggering. The Fossil Fuel industry is glad to have your support. Try reading sometime

All of those are subsidized by the government with the task of "proving" climate change. It's like when the tobacco companies said "we did studies, it perfectly safe."

NOAA is the government entity tasked with monitoring the weather. All the others get their data from NOAA. National Geographic is a publisher.

That 97% bullshit was disproved long ago. The only poll ever conducted was answered by mostly non-scientists. Unless you'd care to point everyone to an actual poll.....but you can't.

You are unable to read any evidence because your head is up Fox News's ass to much. Who are you going to believe, NASA, Academic textbooks, 97% of all scientists or Donald Trump who says "The sound of windmills causes cancer." lol........ Sorry my meme made you cry. I know you are too afraid to read from academic site. You are a dumb Trumper after all and so are the rest of the morons who are ignorant, brainwashed and unable to research. lo

You can't argue against the USCRN, so you're attacking everything else. I've seen this before, and it never gets any less amusing.

Your meme didn't make me cry, you issued a challenge and I answered it. Now you're throwing a tantrum because you can't refute the climate data from NOAA while at the same time demanding that I accept NOAA climate data cherry-picked by your masters.

You can dance around the facts, claiming that they aren't facts. Or you can take a long, hard look at the data collected by NOAA (the people who collect ALL weather data in the USA).

BTW This is from your Precious NOAA site "“It’s now been 15 years since the publication of what is considered the first research on the role of climate change in extreme weather, and during that time the evidence that human-caused climate change is impacting weather events has only been increasing,” Guess that sucks for you lol https://www.noaa.gov/news/report-climate-change-is-making-specific-weather-events-more-extreme Once again sorry to make you cry Trumper lol

You are just s dumb Trump cult follower. Nothing more nothing less. https://theconversation.com/5-ways-trump-and-his-supporters-are-using-the-same-strategies-as-science-deniers-127076

I haven't mentioned Trump at all. That's your argument, not mine.

I stopped sending evidence to dumb Trumpers like you a long time ago. When I waste my time sending evidence to ignorant right wingers like you, all of a sudden you lose your ability to read. You can not form a thought in your mind unless Fox News gives you permission to. The evidence on academic sources is there for you to view. Go to NASA, National Geographic, all the 97% or more of scientific writings on the subject, to any university online Library. Even Liberty University library online is overwhelming near 100% in agreement with me. I guess they are wrong and you, Sean Hanity, and Donald Trump are right? lol..... "I love the uneducated." -Donald Trump 2/24/2016...... lol

You're the only person quoting Trump here. I'm quoting NOAA, the agency that supplies weather data to NASA.

And I don't understand why you're trying to cite National Geographic - that's a magazine, and not even a scientific magazine.

BTW This is from your Precious NOAA site "“It’s now been 15 years since the publication of what is considered the first research on the role of climate change in extreme weather, and during that time the evidence that human-caused climate change is impacting weather events has only been increasing,” Guess that sucks for you lol https://www.noaa.gov/news/report-climate-change-is-making-specific-weather-events-more-extreme

That isn't the data - that's an article about another article that NOAA scientists didn't write....

This is where you'll find the data

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/land-based-station-data/land-based-datasets/us-climate-reference-network-uscrn

LOL,,, Do you climate deniers ever read what you send. The Data inside the site just confirms everything claim you made which is wrong. lol. As Far as NOAA goes of course you have some flimsy excuse, Yes the people of NOAA just let some freelancer come in and write articles for them. You can't even use facts to go against what is said in NOAA. All you have are the usual Fox News, climate denier talking points.

Try reading what you send. lol. Warning requires reading lol
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/faq/global-warming.php

You're linking outside the dataset again

I guess the IPCC is wrong but you and President Windmill cancer is right? lol https://www.ipcc.ch/reports/

The strategy of Trumpers is to ignore evidence, get their information on Fox News, claim that sites like NOAA support your positions (except when they dont lol) deny what is in there, use flimsy excuses such as a rouge writer went on the site and made stuff up, lol..... Just admit it, you don't know what you are talking about, you can't read. You think that by getting the last word that somehow wins your argument when all it does is makes you look more foolish. I notice you duck and dodge all evidence I sent you, you ignore Trump's battle with windmill cancer but yet you look to him as a guide. lol... You're a loser on this site, a loser on the internet and a loser in life. lol "I love the uneducated." -Donald Trump

So NASA is wrong but you and Trump are right? lol
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

And the NOOA National Center for Environmental Information uses data and conclusions reached by the IPCC report which I just mentioned earlier, "The IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios determines the range of future possible greenhouse gas concentrations (and other forcings) based on considerations such as population growth, economic growth, energy efficiency and a host of other factors."