Beto was the most anti-gun candidate in the race and he’s no longer in it, and yeah he said “we’re coming for your guns” but all he proposed was mandatory buy-backs for assault weapons only, that you could in the end pay a fine to avoid
How can the Government 'Buy Back' an Item it never owned?
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Don't forget the Rest. Plus AOC and the Squad all have said it. So there is not just one. But it was a valiant effort. Joe says buy a shotgun. Feinstein says ban all semi automatic weapons which is ALL weapons except maybe lever action.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
They think assault weapons are automatic and once someone says that you know they don't know a damned thing about guns.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
There is no assault weapon. People assault. It is an action not a weapon.
We are smart enough to recognize there is always a human behind the trigger
However assaults with guns are more deadly than assaults with knives, hammers, butter knives, and whatever other ridiculous implement you guys like to compare guns to
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
3 replies
You should look up the stats. All of those things are more deadly than guns. In fact gun violence is much less than car related deaths. And there are way more stabbings. And the CDC and a few other studies in colleges found guns save well over 500k people in crimes yearly. So if you do the math. Guns are necessary without them it will be chaos. There will be rampant murder with no fear of danger from criminals who do not have legal guns anyway. Not like someone willing to murder is going to follow a law. I mean murder is against the law right? I like how you deflect to another made up point though. I slammed your first response as incorrect so you made up another false statement. You should just put this sign in your yard and move on. You will never win the gun control in America there are just too many. I have more buried in this country on my land than you could ever take away.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
I am pretty sure a hammer would be much more horrific way to die. Just sayin. Lmao. A hammer is more humane. Ok so killing with a spork is ok? Dumb statement.
Cars are neccessary? I guess the end justify the means.
The number one killer in women is obesity induced heart disease . More than all the other causes combined. Maybe we should be legally obligated to fat shame and I Inforce diets. Snickers bars aren't necessary
But that's silly
Feel free to cite any of these magnificent studies you reference; in the meantime, you have this to contend with
Vehicles are dangerous but necessary implements of modern existence. We have much heavier regulations around them than we do around guns: mandatory insurance, drivers license requirements, etc.
Nobody talks about banning cars because that is a f**king stupid idea. If we did, then you would rightly ridicule us for it. Instead you find a convoluted way to ridicule us for *not* advocating banning them. Dumb.