Imgflip Logo Icon

How low can they go

How low can they go | Trump can name
his son Barron; he can’t make
  him a baron; END IT  ALREADY | image tagged in statue of liberty crying,memes,democrats,impeachment hearings | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,398 views 20 upvotes Made by ArcMis 5 years ago in politics
18 Comments
7 ups, 5y
HAHAHAHA! right?! This lady is incredibly dishonest and pathetic. Did you see the quote from her admitting that she's so triggered by simply being in the vicinity of the Trump hotel in DC that she had to cross the street to make it stop? She donated thousands of dollars to Hillary's campaign with the hopes of becoming a supreme court justice and she's distraught that will never happen now. What a loser.

I can't decide what's more troubling, this circus the dems are putting on, or the complicit MSM and the fact that people like "whistlelock" actually think what's going on is justified and morally right. They're THAT galvanized in their blind allegiance to the "resistance" so as to come to the defense of something as retarded as making an argument that Trump is acting like a royal dictator. It's beyond absurd. One thing is certain, their brainwashing machine is quite effective!
2 ups, 5y,
4 replies
What do you think her words mean?

No, I'm serious.

What do you think she's saying?
5 ups, 5y
Her point/ the context was something like: "in America there's no titles of nobility and no monarch who dispenses them - they are unconstitutional"

few questions:

• whatever far-fetched context for nobility titles would there be re: impeachable offenses or quid-pro-quo?
• why would she have to name Barron Trump as an example to make her superfluous point that there's no nobility and titles in the US which is well known and undisputed anyway?
• why would it matter in an impeachment hearing what name parents give to their children?
• why would she bring up the argument to begin with?

If you're able to read between the lines - here's why:
• Democrats are trying to spin the narrative: 'Trump rules like an autocratic monarch considering himself above the law'.
• Karlan is a known partisan hack.
• The impeachment hearing is nothing but a shit show where only the accuser's party can summon witnesses or hearsay
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yeah, Trump knows he's not a king, big guy.
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Does he? And do the Republicans know that? 'Cause I'm not seeing that.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
NOBODY ACTED MORE A KING THAN I DID...AND YOU NEVER CARED. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
You can’t see anything because you’re blinded by Democrat loyalty, whistlelock.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Did he appoint his family to positions in the White House despite failing background checks?
Did he say "Article 2 of the Constitution says I can do whatever I want!"
Did he demand personal oaths of loyalty from his staff?

Cut the bullshit. Own what you are.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
No, he said he he had “a pen and a phone” and pushed through his own laws like a king.

He also attacked and threatened both 1st and second amendment rights and called the constitution “flawed” and irrelevant.

He attacked private industry and he lied through his teeth. All the while pieces of shit like you cheered him on.

We won’t own shit because the shit is on your side. We are going to destroy your shit, asshole.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
Democrats are only for the constitution when someone from the opposing party is president...and even then they use it incorrectly for their own benefit.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Exactly what laws did he push through with a Republican House & Senate for the majority of his 2 terms?

Attacked the 2nd amendment? How many gun laws did he propose? How is saying we should do universal background checks threatening the 2A?

Attacked private industry? What the hell are you talking about?
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Dumbass, I guess you forgot about that DACA and DAPA thing and other “executive orders.”

He didn’t have a GOP majority for the majority of his two terms either. His party controlled both houses of Congress his first two years (the Senate by supermajority). The GOP didn’t take control until the last two years.

After all, “you didn’t build that,” right?

I am not debating with you. I stopped debating with you shitass hypocritical communists a long time ago. Get lost.

F**k you and your dumbass Obama.

If he was white he would have been impeached after his first two years.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You see, 4 years would be half of his terms. More than 4 years would be a majority.

So.

6 out of 8 years is a majority.

Issuing executive orders makes him a King? By the end of the 3rd year of his first term, President Obama had issued 108 executive orders.

I wonder how many executive orders Trump has issued as of December in the 3rd year of his term?

130.

So...

I guess that means by your guidelines Trump is acting even more like a King than President Obama was.

Huh.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
Senate was only two years you massive dumbass.

And there are differences between executive orders and making your own laws you dumbass.

GTFO libshit
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
What? Trump had all three branches and could hardly get anything done when it mattered. Paul Ryan was his minion??? McCain? I get you hate Trump but let's be rational.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply

https://youtu.be/nlFxy4NGNlQ?t=68
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y
America is rallying around Trump. It is the left that isn’t. And they aren’t America.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
She’s a disgruntled, deranged leftist...like you, whistlelock.
1 up, 5y
"So you want to talk monarchy?"
Dem's narrative"impeachment to fight autocrat / monarchy" confirmed by obviously drunk Pelosi
https://twitter.com/trish_regan/status/1203018805758308352
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • 191204105433-professor-pamela-karlan.jpg
  • Statue of Liberty Crying
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Trump can name his son Barron; he can’t make him a baron; END IT ALREADY