Dr. Strangelincoln says...

Unity doesn't promise to impeach Trump the day after he's elected.

Donald Trump is not the Republican party.

I'm talking about the Democrats, who promised to impeach Trump before his inauguration.

Why would anyone want unity with that nonsense?

So, the Republican party no longer cares for unity and civility?

Not unless democrats return to some form of sanity.

The Republican Party, as a whole, is hard at work at dismantling government and keeping it stagnation while people suffer. Their indecision and commitment to reform the government may sound promising to an ignorant Libertarian, while their oligarchs drool at the promise of scaling back the constitution, save for the bill of rights, at the prospect of running a functional one-party authoritarian system.

The President cares not at all about the constitution, despite what little good he's done to undo some of Obama's executive orders, filling in with his own despite having complete Republican support for two whole years, and constantly uses the media and the Democrats as scapegoats for whenever he seems weak, ineffectual, or stupid.

The Democratic Party offers reform, perhaps NOT at the scale I would agree with, but if they remained as stagnate and ineffectual as the current Republican class, then I would turn on them. Obstructing their proposals, and impeachments, in a Republican-controlled Senate is the best they can do and they will continue receive very little criticism from me so long as their goals remain noble if not naive.

Removing Trump is not a sign of insanity, but a sign of sanity. Ignoring the dangers Trump poses to our country, despite any good he may be doing, is more dangerous than any threat the Democrats as a whole pose to our country.

The scary part is that you probably believe that with all of your heart.

As a productive member of society (I run a business, that creates a product which enables other businesses to function), the changes Trump has overseen have been amazing to growth. All sectors have benefited.

What do the democrats offer? They offer to give preferred status to the fringe of society, to increase taxes, to take the failed ACA and crank it up to 11..... It's like the Democrats look for new and creative ways to snatch failure from the jaws of success. It's as if they push for the success of a fringe group over the success of the nation as a whole - they want to promote behaviors that will be detrimental to the future of the nation in order to appease the social justice crowd. Anti-police, pro-crime, anti-business, pro-drug, anti-education, pro-censorship.... It amazes me how many people cheer for the demise of their own country.

Beliefs are irrelevant to facts.

Anti-education?

One could argue that both sides are "anti-education" but I'm afraid I would lean toward Democrats who wish to promote public schools and expand education into college-level. As someone who works with teachers, the Republicans have it backwards to privatize education in order to do? What exactly? Only have the rich have easy access to it? Consolidate and shrink the public education in favor of more charter schools? Control what is and isn't taught in these schools by removing regulation of the qualification of those teaching?

Anti-Police?

I assume you mean holding authorities responsible when they make mistakes like shooting unarmed civilians. That is not anti-police. That is pro-justice.

Pro-drug?

The only thing that seems remotely bipartisan is Democrats and Republicans seem to be cracking down on "big pharma" and it's outrageous prices. Granted, it is a "fringe" group from both parties actively tackling those issues. Though I suspect you also mean the legalization of marijuana. Which that's not pro-drug. That's pro-business.

Pro-crime? No idea what you mean.

As for Pro-censorship and anti-business, you have points there. Over-regulation is certainly a key issue with them, and a personal issue I have as well. I strongly appose censorship and frown at the activities of university campuses that specifically try to silence opponents with different perspectives with ridiculous measures under the false pretenses of personal safety. I'm hoping we can, at the very least, agree on that?

anti-education: replacing subjects with indoctrination. It used to be that kids didn't know what political party their teachers belonged to, now teachers are taking kids out of school to protest the president. Then there is the intentional dumbing down of the curriculum. I'm all for privatized education. Communities who make good educational decisions will see growth, while communities who invest poorly will see people leave those communities.

anti-police: I shouldn't have to explain this, but apparently - police are under attack from all manner of liberal groups, being called racist (even the black officers) for enforcing the law equally.

pro-drug: first pro-weed, and now pro-meth movements (South Dakota), as unbelievable as that seems. These drugs destroy communities.

pro-crime: many liberal cities are announcing that they will not investigate theft crimes where the value of the item stolen is less than $500 (or whatever their arbitrary number is). This is only going to encourage crime, because now the criminals know the threshold where the police get involved. As long as they steal less than that amount, they'll get away with it.

I'm glad you recognize the censorship and anti-business practices that are escalating in recent years.

I say, let people (and ideas) rise on their own merit. Letting people get away with crime, or encouraging drug use, and intentionally giving poor education - all of this social justice engineering for "equality" isn't going to push anyone up, it's only going to drag people down - preventing them from achieving, because someone might get their feelings hurt.

You’ve inspired me to use this dope meme template more thanks man imgflip.com/i/3i1r4c