Imgflip Logo Icon

NO HATE COMMENTSplay nice

NO HATE COMMENTSplay nice | 2 QUESTIONS.


1) ARE THERE THINGS THAT A SCHOOL SHOULDN’T TEACH TO CHILDREN; 2) SHOULD THE LAW EVER BAN ‘PEACEFUL’ PROTEST | image tagged in religion,lgbtq,protests,law,right,wrong | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
6,736 views 16 upvotes Made by Ricardo_klement 5 years ago in The_Think_Tank
57 Comments
K8. M
8 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1. Sex ed and religion
2. No
7 ups, 5y
I agree Kate, both subjects you have picked are definitely the ones parents and not the state should bear the responsibility of teaching.
And we both agree people have the right to protest anything in a peaceable fashion.
Thank you 😊

Peace.
[deleted] M
7 ups, 5y,
2 replies
I think everyone has the right to participate in peaceful protest.
I'm not sure if there are subjects that shouldn't be taught. But there are subjects that I think shouldn't be compulsory. Outside of Maths, English, Geography etc. Parents and kids should have more choice as to what subjects they have to take.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Schools, by law, should have to get permission from parents to brainwash their kids with sex, perversions and degeneracy. Grade 3 kids learning graphic sex practices, straight or otherwise, hell no.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I don't care when it's kids. Young kids. In some places the range of topics taught is way beyond the pale. When I grew up, it was reasonable.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
2 ups, 5y
I agree.
6 ups, 5y
Thanks for your answers TD.
I agree on both with you.
My wife and I decided that none of our children would have any type of religious education until secondary school (all their primary & junior schools have agreed with our wishes) where it is compulsory, but at that age they are better able to place it for what it is.

Peace.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1: yes
2: no

short and simple :)
7 ups, 5y
Thanks for the answers buddy.

Could you please elaborate on answer #1 ( you don’t have to if you don’t want ) just curious.

Peace.
5 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Is the bottom pic in England?

Cultural Marxism
No
6 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Yes my friend it is Birmingham u.k.

Could you please give me an outline of what you mean by cultural Marxism.

Peace.
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I heard of their protest but I didn't know it got banned. Shame.

Smug atheism (Hostile to Christianity yet embracing Islam), feminist agenda (including feminizing boys), lbtg agenda/gender studies, post modernism, communism, anti white agenda/shaming generationally etc.

Peace.
5 ups, 5y
I think I can get onboard with being a anti- cultural Marxist too 👍

Peace.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
2 ups, 5y
I'm not even going to click rationalwiki.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
It is a fact that the Frankfurt school came to America and implemented their goals, having made the change of 'the haves vs the have not's' to 'the oppressed vs the oppressors' in a place with a thriving middle class.

You'll die on that hill and most here know it. Anyone paying the slightest attention knows it.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Just that it's reality. I'm reading into you a bit but I think I'm not wrong.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y
That cultural Marxism isn't rampant in education.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Isn't "cultural marxism" an anti-semitic conspiracy theory?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
The Frankfort School and their work ain't a conspiracy theory. What we've seen over the last 20 years ain't a conspiracy theory. I could give a shit if Jews are involved or not today or yesterday, ain't gonna stop me from standing against it.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Lmao, the frankfurt school has had little to no influence on political philosophy for decades, if they were involved in some conspiracy they would at least have to be somewhat influential on modern philosophy, wouldn't they?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Yeah, the dynamic shifting from the haves vs the haves nots to the oppressed vs the oppressor has absolutely zero representation in the west. Okay.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Name one modern day philosopher who is influenced by the frankfurt school.
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1. Crimes
2. No because it is peaceful
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Thanks for your input.

Peace.
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y
Ha
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1. No religion, no political agenda, and only basic biology when it comes to reproduction.
2. No, if it honestly a peaceful protest.
4 ups, 5y
Peace.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
1. I'm personally opposed to schooling (as a legal, organized institution). It is the duty of the parent to teach their children the ways of life. Giving this important task to anybody else is very irresponsible and even dangerous. And the parent has no right to compain if their child turns out to be a degenerate because they haven't raised them properly

2. No
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Can you believe it's illegal to homeschool in Germany? I agree with you. Schools are indoctrination centers. There's a reason the UN wants kids in daycare as young as 2.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
As a matter of fact, yes, I can. Germany, alongside the UK and Sweden, stands as concrete evidence of why neo-liberalism/cultural Marxism is a practical disaster.
3 ups, 5y
It makes me seethe. I'm so blackpilled.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Parents can't even defend their daughters in those countries, especially England. Makes me puke.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
4 ups, 5y,
2 replies
A feminist government. Yaaaaaay
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
WT actual f*ck.
These a-holes want babies born with a serious & easily spreadable disease.
Stop the planet .. I want to get off 😤

Peace.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yeah, HIV drugs for life... Hmmmmm...
4 ups, 5y
Hmm 🤔

peace.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Yaaaay. I remember hearing that in California, it is no longer a criminal offense to willingly and knowlingly infect someone with HIV. Honk honk, f**king honk.

Sometimes, I wonder how you westerners don't go completely out of your f**king minds over such retarded policies. Or did that fluoride, fast food and TV exposure kill too many brain cells in most of you to care?

In Germany (this one I don't remember the details very well, so if you're familiar with the story, feel free to correct me), the people were complaining about the migrants with the cliché "they're taking our jobs" argument. Walter Lübcke, a German politician (not sure what kind of a politician, but it doesn't matter), said to them: "If you don't like our immigration policy, you are free to leave Germany". A few months later, this guy received a bullet in the head by Stephan Ernst, a local neonazi.
Personally, I don't care about immigration. People can do whatever they want as long as they keep me out of it. But that event stands as solid evience that if you, as Max Payne said it, push a man for too long and sooner or later, he'll start pushing back. There are only a few things that make me as happy as when the people bring up enough courage to stand up to their own government.
3 ups, 5y
I think most Americans could recognize the level of cognitive dissonance necessary to accept these policies if they were presented as you guys have done here. The problem is complacency & control of the media. As you mentioned, we are numbed & distracted by fluoride, fast food, & T.V. among other things, drugs, etc... to the point that people are not moved to take action about anything until it directly inconveniences them. Add this to the fact that the people pushing these policies have a strong grip on the media that the majority of Americans consume and ideas that are at odds with a persons mental, physical, and cultural well-being are pretty easily accepted. Especially when many people rely on a single source for news if they care about the news at all.
2 ups, 5y
Yes, a gay politician pushed to make deliberately infecting someone with HIV a misdemeanor instead of a felony and won.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
I just remembered something worth telling.

About 4-5 years ago, in our elementary school, there was this...not sure how it's called in English, but I'll say it was an optional off-curiculum subject called Household (a subject about some basic household skills like cooking). I told my mother about this subject and said I didn't want to attend it. When she asked why, I said that there's no reason for me to attend such subject when I have her to teach me the household skills. To that, she said: "Why would I teach you something like that when there are other people willing to do that for me?"

That's when I realized just how irresponsible the average parent is. And then we wonder why is the average kid so spolied or otherwise degenerate. Garbage in, garbage out.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I sort of agree a big part of a school’s remit is to turn out docile conformists.
Wearing uniforms (and having overall appearance codes) to take way any thought of individuality & regimented daily time scales (with penalties for non-conformity).. and that’s before the lessons even start.
But this is the way it has always been and will continue to be.(the system needs docile drones& unfortunately is is very hard to have a family life outside the system)

Peace.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y
Yeah, you're on point, Ricardo.

I do, however, look at Varg Vikernes as an example of a man who managed to, up to a certain point, escape the system and raise his family outside of it.
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
1- sex ed should only be taught no younger than 8th grade, and should only be by parents permission.
2-no. Not ever.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Thanks dude.

Peace.
2 ups, 5y
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
That's when I remember it being taught, fellow X'er. And it was reasonable. Now I agree you should have the right to opt out of it.
1 up, 5y
Yup, middle school. When kid’s hormones start raging. It should be up to the parents to teach sex any earlier. (Which they should). Sadly, these days schools are more of indoctrination institutions than unbiased, basic and practical knowledge-taught schools...
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
2 QUESTIONS. 1) ARE THERE THINGS THAT A SCHOOL SHOULDN’T TEACH TO CHILDREN; 2) SHOULD THE LAW EVER BAN ‘PEACEFUL’ PROTEST