Spongebob HMMM Meme

FTFY

This has to qualify, if not win, the dumbest meme of the week award. Congratulations!

Aside from enochthewatcher's excellent meme debunking part of your pathetic meme, I should add that what president Trump has done regarding the wall, withdrawing from the Paris accord, and the trans ban, are policies. Sorry to break it to you, but your opinion disagreeing with them does not mean they are "mistakes."

Regarding Korea, you're just being ignorant. Anyone who can look at how Trump has dealt with NK and think that we've moved closer to a "third world war" clearly has not been paying attention. Engaging that fat little punk has done more for world security, and security in the region than any president going back to what Bill Clinton did.

And speaking of Clinton and Korea, back in 1994 he worked out an agreement with them that was intended to reduce their nuclear military capability. We see how well that worked out, since president Trump has to deal with the issue now.

As usual, progressive idiots seem to find comfort in blaming president Trump for problems that have been around for decades, as if they all started because of him, on January 20, 2017.

You're not helping your cause.

You trump supporters are the worst of Trump himself. Going out of the united states from the Paris agreement was a huge mistake because climate change is real. In short, glaciers are solved year after year, and on the transgender military's ban it makes no sense if they are good soldiers let them work. The wall is a big bullshit costing millions of dollars, and on the Russiagate Trump literally licked Putin's ass no president showed submission to a foreign leader, and on the North Korea Kim Jong un and Trump have literally played to those who had the biggest nuclear button. so don't defend the indefensible because the mistakes made in these 3 years are proof that he is the worst president after Bush

Regarding the Paris accords, even if something like that is supposed to be for a good cause, it can be implemented so poorly, that the net effect is bad. In this case, absolutely bad for America.

The trans ban isn't about the trans soldiers as much as it is about the intolerance of those serving with them. Military units need cohesion to effectively and destroy their equipment. Any distraction from that cohesion is a problem. Unfortunately, trans soldiers are that distraction. It's too bad, and normally I would advocate for their rights, because I don't believe they should be discriminated against. But just as you can't yell fire in a crowded theater and claim free speech, because of the harm to the greater number of people, the trans ban is (for now at least) for the safety of the country.

I think Jim Acosta pretty much invalidated your argument against the wall when he went to a portion of the border with a wall, and observed that there were no illegal crossings. Man, is he stupid. Don't be like Jim.

If you believe Trump literally licked Putin's ass (and no, I won't scold you for misuse of the word "literally") then why didn't your Mueller boondoggle prove it? It you, Schiff, and everyone else with proof of this, would just come forward... then we'd finally be able to get to the bottom of it.

I can't even comment on what you said about NK and KJU. It made no sense to me. I don't have a clue what you mean by "literally played to those who had the biggest nuclear button". And no, I won't scold you (again) for not knowing what the word "literally" means.

The bottom line here, imo, is that you're very passionate in your hatred of Trump. Fine, no big deal there. You have that right. But where people may get irritated with you, is when you state what are clearly your opinions as facts. That just doesn't fly.

Literally, it doesn't fly... (thought I'd throw that "literally" in, just in case it would help you understand what I'm saying.)

Are trans soldiers a national danger? I didn't know, on Putin he submitted to him so much that the media called him traitor,on the nuclear button read this article https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42549687
Ps I’m not only who hate Trump,the 54% of Americans disapprove his work as president and what do you have against the word "literally"

I don't believe trans soldiers as individuals are a national danger. As part of a cohesive military, they are problematic, imo. Did you read what I wrote? I said this issue is more about the intolerance of those serving with them. I wish that it were different.

Regarding Putin, you are not doing yourself any favors, imo. Why? Because by saying "... he submitted to him so much that the media called him a traitor." (him being Trump) you're admitting, 100%, that you believe what the media tells you to believe. There's more to critical thinking than regurgitating what Lawrence O'Donnell tells you to believe.

Regarding NK, I read the article you linked. I don't understand how that supports what you said before, which was "on the North Korea Kim Jong Un and Trump have literally played to those who had the biggest nuclear button." What do you mean when you say they "played to those"? Played? Who are "those"? There are only Kim and Trump in the context of that comment. It makes no sense to me. What does make sense to me is how Trump has dealt with Kim and NK. Sure, he blew hot air about NK and the nuclear button thing. That's Trump's way of dealing with a petty dictator, and for my money, he's dealt with NK better than all presidents going back through Bill Clinton. I wish you could judge him on how it has turned out, not on what your friends in the media tell you to think.

So, if 54% of Americans approved of Trump, you would too? Again, you're not making much of a case for yourself as an independent thinker.

Regarding the word literally, I have nothing against it. I will be critical when it's used in a way that I believe is incorrect based on its definition, which is: "in a literal manner or sense; exactly." Synonyms include: verbatim, word for word, line for line, letter for letter, to the letter, exactly, precisely, faithfully, closely, strictly, strictly speaking, accurately, rigorously.

Hopefully you get my point. So, if you have photos of Trump literally licking Putin's ass, I'm sure not just those 54% you mention, but the entire world, would like to see them. Well, maybe not "like" to see them, because who would really want to see that?

If you're using the word for emphasis of a point you're trying to make, I would advise against it. In written form, it comes across as making your point weaker. That's just my opinion. (I'm actually trying to help you here... although I'm not sure why.)

FYI Enoch is very critical of Trump here, maybe the most
Congrats, you are prejudice