Imgflip Logo Icon

Broken Promises

Broken Promises | IF TRUMP CLAIMS HE IS GOING TO DEFEND OUR 2ND AMENDMENT, ASK HIM, WHY HE DOESN'T ABOLISH THE SULLIVAN-ACT IN NEW YORK CITY? | image tagged in trump,nra,guns,2nd amendment,new york city,racism | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
460 views Made by Brujo-13bx 5 years ago in politics
33 Comments
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1. The President doesn't abolish laws - That's the responsibility of Congress.
2. Neither the President, nor Congress have any control over state law - and the Sullivan Act is a New York law, not a federal law.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
WRONG! The 2nd Amendment is a law, that protects all individuals regardless of state, otherwise a state would have a 10th Amendment right to bring back slavery. If the president can't protect our 2nd Amendment, then he should stop pretending that he will protect all our 2nd Amendment rights.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
No he's not. It's the judicial branch that would enforce the 2nd amendment. Congress that the President have nothing to do with it.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Wrong, when the states violate the rights of the individual, it is the duty of the federal government to protect the individual, when the federal government violates the rights of the individual, it is the duty of the states to protect the individual within that state. The Bill of Rights cannot be denied, since its already established law. It would be like a state ignoring the 13th Amendment and bringing back slavery. In which case, the federal government would step in and put an end to this clear violation. I should add, the judicial branch already stated that all Americans have a right to bear arms, yet some states choose to ignore it, so how is the judicial branch supposed to "enforce" their judgement?
0 ups, 5y,
2 replies
The judicial branch, is part of thew federal government, and the part tasked with overturning unconstitutional laws. You refuted nothing I said, rather you do not seem to know how the process for negating laws that violate our rights actually works.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
0 ups, 5y
You didn't actually refute anything I said, but thanks for the insults and rage instead of facts and reason.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Nope, I already proved my point you ignoramus, you lose troll, checkmate! lol
0 ups, 5y,
2 replies
No, you insulted me without proving anything. Personal attacks are not evidence.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I already proved my point, you insult yourself dumb @ss. Go read the bill of rights. :P
0 ups, 5y,
6 replies
Which doesn't actually prove anything I said wrong. Perhaps you should claim down read the whole constitution and the duties of each branch of government.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I find it funny, how you want someone to explain to you about the process, but you don't explain the process on protecting our rights? If the state ignores the 13th Amendment and enslaves people, how do we solve this? If the state ignores our religious freedom, by saying a religion isn't allowed, how do you suggest we solve this problem? If the state ignores the 4th Amendment by ignoring warrants, how do you suggest we fix it? If the states ignore our 2nd Amendment, where the state denies us legal access to guns, explain the process in which government, federal, state or judges solve this problem? You are real good at telling us how the process doesn't work, despite our rights being ignored, but I see very little from you on how we protect the rights of the American people across the country.
0 ups, 5y
You file a legal change in court and the law gets a stay in the short term or overturned as unconstitutional in the long term. These are basic enough parts of the system of checks and balances that I should even have to explain it.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Blah blah blah, your still a troll, and a racist troll at that. lol
0 ups, 5y
Making stuff up about me to flip out over doesn't make you right.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I already have, and your still an ignorant troll, so blah blah keep talking smack. lol
0 ups, 5y
Really, then how come you tasked the President with interpreting the law and ignored the role of the courts?
0 ups, 5y
Nope.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The 2nd Amendment already states we have a right to bear arms, regardless of your phony interpretations and your silly process. WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS!
0 ups, 5y
Any you're still not refuting anything I have actually said.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I'm not making it up, and your still WRONG! lol
0 ups, 5y
No. you're lying about me and raging over your own lies.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I already made a sound argument, but apparently your an authoritarian prick, that favors the government's authoritarian policies that clearly violate our rights. Your also a racist asshole, because if you read the Sullivan-Act, you would reject it, not find ways to legally justify it.
0 ups, 5y
Nope, you keep arguing against things I never said and blowing up over your pretend comments.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Not his job. He upholds laws, Congress makes laws, state legislators make laws, court interpret their constitutionality
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
WRONG! His job is to uphold the laws of the constitution, such as the bill of rights period, and no federal, state, congress nor court of law can take those inalienable rights away, which are inherent.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
really? He can't fart without some judge slapping an injunction on him, it in NOT his job to abolish laws
0 ups, 5y
No, its his job to protect the bill of rights (laws). The judges who don't allow things, suddenly pops up when government decides to ignore our rights. They might have the might but that don't mean they have the right. These judges are unconstitutional and should be removed from the bench.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I love this meme, it seems to drive both left and right crazy. Notice Trump supporters don't want to agree because it criticizes Trump as being inapt, yet notice anti-Trump leftist, can't agree either, because it goes against their anti-gun stance despite their hate of Trump. Both sides are full of it. lol
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Maybe both sides are full of it.

But you are ignorant to how the government works, you’re arrogant in your attitude to those who argue with you, you insult anyone who differs in opinion or backs their argument up with facts.

Your assessment is flawed mostly due to only having a basic knowledge of our constitution but a fundamental disconnect in how laws and bills are created, applied, enforced, vetoed, and abolished.

You are, unfortunately, a troll as your stance is only to provoke rather than argue with any meaningful approach such as offering a different perspective or actual insight.

You seem somewhat capable of reading, I suppose. I suggest you continue your education and stifle your gloating of your basic understanding of your rights when you’ve caught up to basic college level.

Stick to pop culture references and Satan worshiping memes in the meanwhile. Those appear to be your current strengths.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
WRONG! lol I could care less what you think, so waste your time typing. :P Btw If you don't care and think I'm arrogant, then get off my dick. Why are you on this page talking to me? Cause your on my dick, otherwise you would move on, not feel the need to tell me off. Which means your owned bitch!
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Most amusing. Avoid driving fast, kid. I’m sure you think you’re in control but this world has a nasty habit of cutting short those who think they got it all figured out.
0 ups, 5y
Yeah, like you. Go read the Constitution instead of the Talmud. lol
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 2
  • Black Wallpaper.jpg
  • mk18.png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    IF TRUMP CLAIMS HE IS GOING TO DEFEND OUR 2ND AMENDMENT, ASK HIM, WHY HE DOESN'T ABOLISH THE SULLIVAN-ACT IN NEW YORK CITY?