More inconsistent arguments

@Timber1972 - I would think if there was credible evidence, then the judicial branch would be investigating and then they could approach another country and ask to cooperate. The problem here, is not only that it's not the judicial branch, it's the president targeting one person, who just happens to potentially be his main political opponent in the coming election. According to the rough transcript of the call, Trump didn't even talk about anything else that was relevant to the business of the United States. Futhermore the President seemed to be willing to use the machinery of the State such as freezing payments to the Ukraine that Congress had approved. And Giuliani is his personal lawyer, he has no business being involved in this at all. This at the very least is worthy of an impeachment inquiry.

What's not credible here is your understanding of the Constitution.

Please copy and paste the relevant section from the Constitution where it authorizes "impeachment inquiries". The House votes for impeachment, or it does not. There's not one thing in the Constitution about never-ending investigations without charges against the President.

It's very simple - they either put up, or shut up. Every democrat that refuses to vote for impeachment should be removed from office, tried, and if found guilty of treason should be shot.

@JohnDynamo - investigations are part of the checks and balances of the American system. Every time the President does something that warrants it, there should be an investigation. You might also want to look up the definition of treason. Hint, it's not investigating whether the President did something worthy of impeachment.

I think it is a fair question to ask when the president has the legal authority to ask for an investigation. But remember, he didn't ask the US Legal System to investigate, he asked a foreign power to investigate a political rival. It may come down to whether you asked in bad faith. However, I would argue that in most cases it is wrong when you're asking a foreign country to investigate. Like I said earlier if the legal system of the US had credible evidence and then asked a foreign country to cooperate in an investigation, that would be okay.

If you think this is okay, then I would ask you to put the shoe on the other foot. Would it be okay for a Democratic President to ask a foreign country to look into something that his / her probable chief political Republican rival "did". It should also be pointed out, that there is not credible evidence that Biden did anything wrong. For example, the company his son worked for was NOT being investigated at the time. It was in the interest of the US to get a corrupt prosecutor fired. Is it in the interest of the US for the Ukraine to pursue a discredited theory? Is it in Trump's interest? Should payments for the defence of the Ukraine already approved by Congress be withheld for Trump's personal benefit?

ENDLESS INVESTIGATIONS WITHOUT CHARGES ARE NOT PART OF THE CONSTITUTION.

Period. End of Story. Full Stop.

The Constitution authorizes Congress to bring articles of impeachment, not a pseudo-impeachment where no charges are ever brought. If I am wrong, then show me the word "investigation" or "inquiry" in the Constitution. It's just that simple. If you cannot then I am right, and you need to apologize for being stupid then pour yourself a huge, steaming mug of shut-the-hell-up.

Also, dumbass, the very definition of treason includes waging war against the states. Trying to unlawfully and extra-Constitutionally remove a lawfully elected President is an act of war against the states.

You have to quit hanging around shit-for-brains. He is rubbing off on you, and not in a good way.

Congressional oversight is a fundamental part of our system of government. Sorry, that I'm not a stable genius.

Congressional oversight is not a 'fundamental' part of anything. It is a duty of Congress SPELLED OUT IN THE CONSTITUTION.

Endless investigations without bringing charges IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION.

Only a brainless jackass like you can't understand these concepts. Either prove me wrong, or shut the hell up already. Your stupidity is boring the hell out of everyone.

These aren't endless investigations of the same things, the call to the Ukraine prompted a new investigation as it rightly should have.

I don't see how saying something is a fundamental part of our system is any different than you saying it is a duty of Congress. That is a distinction without a difference.

Also, charges are coming, but Congress without be derelict of it's duty if it didn't do a proper investigation first.

You have every right to your own point of view, and are free to express them, but you don't have the right to keep insulting me and telling me to shut-up,

Cheers.

Hey, jackass -

I NEVER SAID it was a duty of Congress. Here is what I said : "It is a duty of Congress SPELLED OUT IN THE CONSTITUTION." Stop lying about what I said. What I said cites from where Congress derives the authority to act. Your mental diarrhea did not cite authority. That's a HUGE difference.

As for you not liking me insulting you : f**k you. You are a moron that like shit-for-brains refuses to admit his mistakes. You won't post any evidence that proves me wrong, yet you keep blathering on and on. Do everyone a huge favor and just shut the f**k up already.

I get it, you're another conservative who believes in free speech, but only if people agree with you.