Why not credit the person who suggested it? Nevermind, any opportunity to blame something on Trump.... Right?

https://m.theepochtimes.com/swedish-researcher-pushes-human-flesh-eating-as-answer-to-future-climate-change-food-shortages_3068833.html

That was the first one to come up.

you really like partisan parcheesi don't ya bud?
appears to be your favorite game.

but way to shift the goal posts to fit your own narrative.

a swede makes the grotesque suggestion,to which a highly partisan,whackadoodle conspiracy super-pac picks up to weaponize and attack a political opponent of trumps.

this:happened

and is not what I am pointing and laughing at.

I am pointing to the ocean of media personalities who engage in demagoguery who took to twitter,with little critical examination,and regurgitated this salacious political theater.

and the muppet class took at as gospel,and gobbled that vomit up as gospel.
unquestioning lemmings who were so delighted to have a piece of red meat to slather and salivate over.

this too:happened.

now I get to watch this vacuous retards try to spin it into something else.
because to admit that they got snookered would take an honesty and courage they simply do not possess.

saw the same thing with the "Russia Russia Russia" people,and even those middle school kids.

muppets come in all flavors.
and all are consistently stupid.

AOC isn't a threat to anyone but her own legacy. She will be known as the ditz who was accidentally elected.

Dems want to pretend the eating babies thing is a conservative invention, but it isn't. Someone had the delicious idea to throw a socialist suggestion at a socialist to see how she would react - and conservatives are the devil for doing it.

I'm going to continue to inject sanity and reality to ridiculous claims.

my ridicule is justified.

you go ahead and do whatever you wish,for whatever reasons.
which has become apparent is hyper-partisan.

and I will continue to ridicule,and mock those too ill-informed,too un-educated and too blind to their own predilections to cult of personality and outrage media to give even the most tangential of critical examinations.

because,as usual,our conversations are not conversations at all,but you talking past me to make your own,narrow and limited partisan point.

so please,by all means,continue to use my responses to springboard your own agenda,and inject your "sanity and reality" to a point I never made..nor even attempted to make.

and I will continue to entertain myself by mocking the muppet class.
you don't need me to continue your crusade.

carry on soldier.

It's kind of funny, since I was only joking at how stupid and clinically insane these things
sound. lmao

especially the muppets on this site.
hoooly shit...
pure
comedy
gold.

Look I only make memes to cope with the bullshit in the world. If people take things too seriously, as they say, if the shoe fits, wear that bitch like a tranny in the red-light district.

I've said it once to a person on here, I'll say it again. Politically aligned centrist/moderate. Means I hate both sides equally and only want good policy that doesn't take people's liberties away for the sake of false security. sound fair?

you will notice I am an equal opportunity offender.
but I don't go after specific people.
unless they make it personal.

there are a lot of alt-right,neo-Nazi muppets on this site,and I mock them relentlessly.

there are also some solid peeps who may lean right,or libertarian right,and even conservative.
you say you are a moderate,and I will take your word for it.
thanks for laying it out for me.
nice to meet ya mate!

What is your definition of neo-nazi and alt-right, since leftists have moved that post to mean anyone who disagrees with them, unfortunately. And they have taken some nazi-like tactics into their own groups so they aren't saints themselves.

I'm not saying I don't know what those types of people are, cause I do, but you've probably seen the idiots who misuse words to slander people in a debate in place of critical thinking.

To be fair, Trump isn't the worst person for president. Sure he is an asshole with piss poor character, and could definitely use a book on tact and etiquette. However, he is successful at pointing out flaws in our system and doesn't kowtow to PC culture. Clinton would have been another corrupt "in it for profit" type with a kill list bigger than a Chinese phonebook.

Americans got handed a bunch of shit piles to choose between, it was pretty slim pickings. It's irritating to me when people fail to realize that. We didn't exactly get upstanding people to pick from in most cases. I think that is an issue people should focus on, having better people pushed to be the leaders we need.

Also, one must leave some room for dark messed up humor to exist... otherwise how else can we cope with the shittiest of shit in this world.

and I have been doing this for over 3 decades.
I don't partisan,because it is just a form of identity politics,and identity politics is cancer.

the majority of americans politics overlap if you actually talk with them.

muppets tend to reside on the fringes of the overton window.they are reactionaries with little substance.their ideology has been handed to them,and they simply parrot whatever is given with little,or no critical examination.

they are good little tribalists.
good little Nazis.
they do the bidding of their masters.
who dog-whistle them to form this weird syphyllitic Voltron to promote ideas and concepts they are too ignorant and stupid to even comprehend .
that they are being used as a tool.
in other words "useful idiots".

memes,in particular,are quite effective to dog whistle.
I do it all the time to see who catches the reference.
muppets never get the reference,because their grey matter is atrophied.
filled only with rhetoric,and revisionist histories.
they worship at the altar of convenient mythologies and tinkle themselves over faux,outrage media.

and these people are dangerous.
so I ridicule them relentlessly.

but if someone is acting like a human being? (like you)
then I will absolutely engage and have a conversation.
because even if we disagree,at least we can understand.
and isn't that far more important than being "right"?

I do agree to a point. I agree with you about the cancerous identity politics. It is daunting to deal with. Meaningless labels that solve nothing in regards to real issues, just minor wars to keep people occupied.

Myths, legends, stories... they all use to hold purpose when passing on wisdom to future generations. "Moral of the story", a phrase long forgotten on many.

Majority of politics overlap in general regardless of nation. Many of us want the same things and a few want to prevent that (extremists).

I wouldn't say tribalism is inherently bad. Human behavior has always had a tribal component and to a degree could be used for progress/ survive-ability of the species. It is when we have certain evil types become leaders and propagandize society against other ethnic societies that things fall apart. A tale as old as time really.

Case in point, Britain with their Orwellian society, China with their extreme control over every person, Middle-eastern countries and their lack of abiding by basic human rights agreements, Socialists central and south America and their inability to understand why socialist policy fails on a country level and then migrate to continue their bad ideas in a different place, and so on.

All history is revisionist history, because history as we know it was written by the victors and the footnotes being the losers. The internet has simply made it easier for the losing side to have a more visible record for everyone to see. And no one can be blamed for falling into its trap, because we were all raised to believe it as truth. Critical thought is dangerous to those who want control. It is why it is considered a gift nowadays.

Yes, the common agree to disagree is always better than being right all the time. Same as admitting we will never know everything much less the truth to everything as well.

Emotion is not easily conveyed in text chat.