Donald Trump and Ronald Reagan

Well, Xerox, once again you read the talking points and ignore the facts. This is from the IG's News Release dated September 30, 2019: Consistent with the law, the new forms do not require
whistleblowers to possess first-hand information in order to file a complaint or information with
respect to an urgent concern. This wasn't hard to find. It was cited on all of the major cable and network news broadcasts and I read it in my loval paper.

I call you guys Xerox, because you just repeat the same stuff that is put out there by the obfuscators and never come up with anything original. It's hardly worth the effort of finding ways to couch the truth that piss you off. I was there when the first Whistleblower laws were introduced. They were designed to make it easy to get information about misdeeds to the top, for action. In reality, first hand or second hand does not matter. You are to report information to the Inspector General that you think might otherwise be covered up. It is up to the I.G. to figure out if it is factual or just gossip and rumors. The I.G. puts unsubstantiated claims in the files, and forwards the ones that appear to have substance. It is up to the people the I.G. alerts to act on the report. So, this I.G. determined the Whistleblower had good information, second hand not-with-standing. It makes me wonder what the State Department I.G. has that is so hot they had to call special meetings with House and Senate Committees, today?

I explained why I call you Xerox and explained the Whistleblower and I.G. process from the standpoint of one who has seen hundreds of them, in my role as a Regional Public Affairs Officer for years and Regional Director of Public Affairs for many years, and other leadership roles. I did not strive to create a counter argument. I just wanted to tell the truth and facts from the perspective of someone who has been there. I am sorry that you wanted an argument.

Its racism to use picture of white people in a meme..

So much for it jk

Citing rumors, gossip, unsubstantiated claims, secondhand sources, and *news clippings* does not a "whistleblower" make.

Also, I'm sure it's all a big kwinkidink that this so-called "whistleblower" is a CIA spook *and* there was a CIA director on the board of that Ukrainian energy co.