The Enemy

I think both are enemies

I think your the bigger danger

why?

Because you refer to refugees as enemies. Nuff said.

I mean criminals, murderers and escaped from justice who use the illegal way to make a new identity. All what people call "refugees"

No. When people say refugee, they mean people fleeing war torn environments. Men women children fleeing for safety.

A vast majority of refugees are legitimate, but you have decided to label all of them criminals, which is disgusting and bigoted. No two ways to say it. If you think most Refugees are Criminal your a Bigot.

You don't agree with his views and refuse to consider it? You're a bigot!

(Sorry, bud, I hate that word)

He literally say that Refugees are killers and Rapists. If that aint bigotry, I don't know what is. Sometimes people /really/ are bigoted.

And some times refugees ARE rapists and killers. You are both extreme in your views. I doubt he honestly thinks all refugees are the enemy and killers and rapists but I could be wrong. I'm not defending his statement, I just think bigot is a stupid word.

"And some times refugees ARE rapists and killers"

I am not saying they are not. But he is saying all of them are. Or at the very least he is suggesting it.

"I just think bigot is a stupid word."

If you find me a better term, I'll be glad to use it.

I get it.

Do you get where I'm coming from? If you said I was bigoted with my views, I could easily point the finger back and say yes, but you're bigoted towards my views. A better word might be extremist, if you think every migrant has a nefarious outlook.

"Do you get where I'm coming from? If you said I was bigoted with my views, I could easily point the finger back and say yes, but you're bigoted towards my views. A better word might be extremist, if you think every migrant has a nefarious outlook."

I get you.

I cant just say bigoted willy nilly, and for the most part I try not to. But I really struggle to describe labeling all Refugees as Criminals anything but Bigoted. I suppose Extremist would also fit, and maybe it would be less offensive.

I get you, I know how it's traditionally used.

Like you said, international
law doesn’t supersede national law. And we don’t have to allow people into the country to apply for asylum. If they sneak in illegally against the law we can deport them back and they can apply back in their home countries, or they can apply in Mexico like they are now allowing them to do there. Now butt out of our affairs. It is not your concern

Not refugees, but illegals. Under 8 US code 1325 the President is also allowed discretion on refugees so you lose that argument as well. What you do in Germany is your laws.

Actually he is not legally bound by international agreements and he is certainly not bound period to take in illegal aliens.

Don’t you just love how Obert thinks he knows more about American affairs than actual Americans like us. He doesn’t seem to understand that the EU doesn’t include the United States.

"He doesn’t seem to understand that the EU doesn’t include the United States."

We can fix that. You buy Greenland, but keep them in the EU and your basically in the EU! XD!!

I didn't say legally. International Law doesn't supersede National one for the most part, but America /still/ signed the International Agreements

The United States recognizes the right of asylum for individuals as specified by international and federal law.

8 U.S. Code § 1158.Asylum

Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.

Yes, I am sure the President can have discretion on Refugees. He is still bound by International agreements

"And we don’t have to allow people into the country to apply for asylum."

No. You absolutely do.

" If they sneak in illegally against the law we can deport them back"

"Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title."

"(whether or not at a designated port of arrival...)"

"hey can apply in Mexico"

Mexico. Safest Country in the Americas

"Now butt out of our affairs."

It hurts when the foreigner knows more abut your own law doesn't it? Then again, your not American

It is seen that they are not refugees when they begin to kill and rape the people who are welcoming them

Sauce? Any evidence for your hate theory?

check internet

It's not OberstGylbert's job to provide proof in an argument for you.

It's ok about proof, I don't want any proof in this site, just want to know his reasons to say that about me. I found it disturbing.

Sigh, Burden of proof lays with you, because your claiming refugees are actually Criminals and rapists funded by soros.

Burden of proof lays with you

Truth be told, it was a confusing time. He was a 14 yo. But his 60 Minutes interview sounded very sketchy and he referred to that time as positive.

Nice how you defend a guy who actually collaborated with nazis. What happened to you, Gilbert?

I don't want to change your ideas, so I have nothing to prove. If you want to change your ideas, do it yourself and look for the evidence.

I didin't said anything about hate, just describe the situation

You literraly saying Refugeesare Killers and Rapists. If you see nithing wrong with that than you my good sir are no better than the KKK or the American Nazi Party

You want to smear Americans as KKK and Nazi party members then get upset when people call out rapists and murderers that came with the migrants???

I didin't talked about refugees. The photo show modern invaders paid by the evil, like Soros.

You know what this is a waste of time if you cant even realise what your saying, tgen there is no hope of convincing you otherwise

I didin't wanted to be convinced about anything from the start, just understand why you say I'm a bigger danger. Still don't understand your reasons.

OberstGylbert is not even an American. He is clueless about our situation but runs his mouth like he knows-all anyway.

Get a life

I would say that would be you. You are the one spending your time butting into other country’s affairs.

Wtf you talkin' about? all I do is scroll through the politics section. Its not excaty a high effort action. You on the other hand follow me around like an angry little dog to yip yap at me for being born on different soil. You actively spend time to find me and thats whats sad

They are criminals fleeing from justice, mercenaries, murderers, terrorists, becoming a new identity by the hand of Soros, the same who has hired them to burst those countries

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/27/immigration-panic-how-the-west-fell-for-manufactured-rage

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/03/wajahat-ali-new-zealand-shooting-global-problem-white-supremacy-isis/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/11/02/an-invasion-illegal-aliens-oldest-immigration-fear-mongering-metaphor-america/%3foutputType=amp

So I suppose this fits the Theme well.

I also think your the bigger danger because you have easily eaten into the right wing propaganda that most refugees are criminals and so would voye away your and your fellow countrymen's liberties for a fictive sense of security that was completely unnecessary from the beginning.

Be careful to read other sources, when you see the truth and start thinking "illegally"

I did and the first three pages of my browser were filled with these types of articles. Its your turn to prove or disprove if you so wish

Maybe you don't read what I said. I don't want to prove anything. Just understand why you said i'm bigger danger that Soros or his mercenaries.

As I said "if you so wish"

What a nutjob. Can you prove /any/ of this?

check internet

Burden of proof lays with you

I didin't come here to prove anything.

You start harassing me even before knowing the reality about the theme

I suggest search the proof by yourself. Or keep being the same.

It's your choose, not mine.

Bah, your the one claiming they are dangerous not me. Burden of proof lays with you.

Either way you wont be convinced by some random guy off if the internet to change your mind so really I shouldnt bother.

I don't want to prove anything. And also I don't want to do it, if it required to express an opinion.

Thanks, but not. Go search the proof yourself if you need it.

Try coming to Canada!!!! 95% of the refugees that have come in are murderer's and rapists!!! Alot of them are from bad gangs in parts of Africa. Do you think they all of a sudden become good people? NO THEY DO NOT

Lmfao, they are the enemy!!!!