Talk about out of context. You just put your spin on the second amendment without even quoting it.
Here let me help: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Now what exactly is a militia? A bunch of citizens with muskets? In 1791, yes. But how do we get a well regulated militia if all the citizens are unarmed? Your argument is pathetic.
Just in case you missed it, here is the link for the most recent SCOTUS opinion where they UPHELD the second amendment as we daft lunatics like it.
(Copied from below link)"The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html
Anything else is just your opinion....