And why would China deal with a scammer?

He sold the Chinese rice for the first time in US history.

The title said china wouldn't make a deal. They already have...

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-usa-trade-rice/china-allows-first-ever-us-rice-imports-in-goodwill-gesture-ahead-of-trade-talks-idUSKCN1OR0LB

Ps. Nixon opened up China... how has that worked out?

Good question! Why WOULD Chine deal with KIM??

why do you think the market tanked this week when they let the Yuan slip briefly?

god do you really listen to that idiot tucker?

Scammer or liar, take your pick.

Yes Benghazi. Hillary lied to the family members about what happened. She lied to Mr. Woods with the body of his dead son nearby. And the thing is, why was her lie necessary? Was she trying to protect the Jihads or what? It was just flat out unnecessary.

Misspoken, really, I would have respected you more if you called it what it was.
And yeah she lies more than once. I heard that she is also a Christian and she has advocated for Christian things in the past. But then she says she supports abortion right up to birth! Regardless of one's opinions on abortion I think we can all agree there is indeed a living baby at the point of birth.
And no, I didn't get that from Fox News. I got it from a longtime democrat while he was giving his reasons for not voting democrat that year.

I recognize Pat Tillman. I don't know the others.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/26/us/us-soldiers-killed-niger.html

Thanks for the article link. I have a vague memory of a team taking casualties in a sort of black ops mission that I believe was the first military op that President Trump authorized. I don't think it was this one as I believe it involved Navy Seals but they didn't have much answers then either.

That's sad, real sad. All they want is the truth and someone has been sitting on their hands and keeping their mouth shut about what happened. The family wants to know the truth more than finding out who is at fault. I don't know much about military operations but I don't think it is standard operating procedures to send a team far away without support and with little intel on the mission. It's like they was sent out to be killed?!

I probably wouldn't know as much about Benghazi if it wasn't for the book and movie. Plus a few comments here and there about it. It's bad not knowing what happened and it's a shame these families hasn't got the answers they deserve.
If Hillary had said she don't know what happened regarding Benghazi instead of trying to shift the blame from Islamic jihads to that of someone making an anti-Islamic video. I wouldn't be fervently calling her a liar regarding Benghazi.
I mean throughout several hours for multiple times the Americans called for help saying they was under attack. They had to know it was Islamic jihads similar to that of 9-11 who was responsible. But like the article you linked said "militants aligned with Islamic state". It's like they can't even say Islamic State was responsible!!! No they beat around the bush and say "militants aligned with ISIS".
Like what Mr. Wright said. Just tell the damn truth!

2 basic points -

a) Hillary had nothing to do with what happened at Benghazi, there was nothing she could have done, and there are YEARS of investigations from both parties that conclude the same thing.

b) funny how righties have been all over the false Benghazi narrative, yet so many never even HEARD of Niger.... why do you think that is?

"a)"
Perhaps if she responded to the diplomat's many many requests for additional security before the attacks things may have been different.

Assuming you are correct and she did indeed have nothing to do with it, that makes her lie even worse. If she had nothing to do with it and could have done nothing to change it then what authority gave her the permission to say their deaths had to do with a video???
If she knew nothing and could have done nothing then why did she act like she knew what happened?
In any case, she made herself involved when she felt the need to lie about who killed the Americans.

"b)"
In my earlier comments I was not saying she could have changed anything. I was pointing out that she lied to protect those damned jihads. If she was not trying to protect them then why lie?

Did you even read my above comment? I think I already answered your question.
*I probably wouldn't know as much about Benghazi if it wasn't for the book and movie. Plus a few comments here and there about it.*

A couple years ago, I was this ignorant on Benghazi. I didn't even know about it while the investigations was going on. I would see the book in Barnes and Noble but I didn't look into it until sometime later.

There are many military ops with unanswered questions. I was even trying to mention another one. I am not denying these incidents happen. But why must politicians lie in a way where it seems like they are protecting Islamic jihads from retribution? That is what I am talking about with Benghazi.
Even the article you linked couldn't call them what they was. They had to beat around the bush and indirectly blame ISIS rather than directly blame them.

. I would see the book in Barnes and Noble but I didn't look into it until sometime later.""""' So you never heard of it..... till someone with an agenda to make money on book sales... wrote a book?... congress makes no money from it, they spent YEARS on it... let that sink in.

The book is the closest account to the truth that I, as a civilian with no family involved, can hope to get unless I interview the ones involved personally.

Actually I think I saw the movie first. But I still didn't learn about the lie until sometime later when I saw comments about it. The movie did make a subtle reference when one of the defenders said they are reports of protests back home. To which another defender said he didn't see any protest.

"congress makes no money from it, they spent YEARS on it"
So you are telling me the book was totally fabricated by the government to push an agenda? To make me think a certain way?

Well if you convince me of that I am going to start questioning damn near everything in history!

so clinton mispoke. likely more than once. Trump flat out LIES daily.... EVERY DAY.... so what is your point exactly again?

Pathetic attempt to derail the conversation.

I am adding to the conversation and reminding everyone of the alternative.
The conversation, I thought, was about lying politicians. Well Hillary lies. If she had won the election she is the liar other country's leaders would be laughing at.

If you don't like Trump perhaps democrats could bring better candidates into the ring. Or maybe we should do away with political parties altogether. It seems all they do is work to divide Americans.

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/

It took me a while to realize you was laonsite. Not sure why you changed your name, it was interesting.

Anyways, I am serious about wanting to have discussions with democrats to promote the working together for the better of our country. But damn, some of you make it difficult.

You try convincing me that the book 13 hours, written by the people over there, is just a government scandal meant to push an agenda. And then you have been linking me articles like CNN and other biased news sites. I read them and try to take in their info with an open mind. But your blatant disregard of my sources does not make me want to consider other opinions.
If you think the book 13 hours is a government agenda, what would you be saying if I linked something from Fox news or other more right leaning news outlets?
Would you even read it or dismiss it as rubbish?

Another thing, there is no greater inconsistency than that of democrats. First you all say President Trump is like a dictator, you all compare him to past tyrants, and you all say he is doing things to restrict freedom.
Some people would dismiss such claims as absolute lies.
But I will look into your claims in an attempt to find out the truth.

Then you all are calling for the banning of guns. You all say civilians shouldn't own guns. How in seven thundering hells can you call President Trump a dictator and then say civilians shouldn't own guns!?!

If you truly believe President Trump to be a dictator how can you say such a thing!
What, do you think twitter and hashtags will save your ass from slavery dictator style!
Who do you think runs those platforms? Who do you think controls the power that generates those platforms?!?

Like I said, you all make it really hard for me to take you seriously.

And while you explain your dismissal of anything I say, how about you also explain how a dictator would allow anyone to vote?

If they can take away guns and free speech why would they allow anyone to vote?

Oh, you mean before that happens. Well before that happens they would just get on stage, make false promises of a peace that will never happen, and you will vote them in. Then their true authoritarian nature will unleash in events no one can stop. And they will have all the firepower so at that point your only option would be to face a firing squad or to submissively exist in slavery.

Peace is a lie.
I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.
Freedom in it's truest form will be dangerous. And peaceful slavery is not real, only an illusion.

Well if he does go full authoritarian there are millions of Americans with guns who will stop it quickly. A few individuals cannot control millions of armed people. They know this.
I just don't understand how you can think like you do of President Trump while also saying guns should be banned.

Do you also think alcohol should be banned because people kill others when they get drunk? They may turn abusive when they are drunk.

Radical Islamic terrorists blow innocents up in acts of terror, yet it is wrong to ban / outlaw islam because not all are bad.

If you want me to continue to try to understand your opinions I would appreciate it if you extend me the same courtesy.

You have a handgrade? why not?

Well they can be used to kill.
Alcohol has zero purpose. It cause nothing but trouble and bad health.

The Brits have a knife ban. My point is that if guns are banned and hateful individuals find other ways to kill will those things be banned next?

This is America, we was built by people using guns to change the ruling government. And if we are not careful we will be ruled by a dictator once more.

You talk of agendas. How come you don't mention that in many mass shootings the police / FBI received many warnings prior to the shooting about the individual. Take that church shooter for example, he was reported many times to the police for domestic abuse and other things.
It's almost like certain people wants these things to happen, so they can push their agenda.