It cant be any more clear

Trump was legally elected, change my mind.

Nixon was legally elected, change my mind. :P

It's strategy now... Next year are the elections, and if Trump faces an impeachment now, the Republicans are sure to win the next presidential elections, as the Trump fans will want "revenge"... What happens after the elections, though.... Who knows...

It was obvious, eh... Trump is the kind of guy who could go down in history as a martyr if an impeachment procedure was started now, and I guess the Democrat party doesn't wish for that to happen :)

That would probably solidify his 2020 campaign

Well, when Bill Clinton faced an impeachment those who were completely supportive of him as a president also became more and more enthusiastic to support him (of course that entire affair was one big joke). Although it did not lead to the Democrats giving the next president after Clinton's 2nd term ended, but every one I spoke agreed to it that if Bill Clinton was allowed a 3rd term he would have won the elections easily, and that impeachment would certainly have played a role in it. Of course, this was in the Democrat's favor, but I'm sure they don't want to repeat the Republican's mistake. Of course in Clinton's case it was a ridiculous case of having sex with a female working in his office, in Trump's case the parallels with the Watergate affair are uncanny, but since we all know that the Trump fans will never admit Trump to be guilty even if all evidence is irrefutable, this will indeed solidify his 2020 election campaign. Although this can lead to Trump getting away with things that are crimes or at least not the way they should be (as a lot is still vague on this point), it's clear that the Democrats cannot risk this. Even it Trump's impeachment is successful, it won't be completed before the elections, and until then he can still run for his second term and if he wins it, we have a Republican in the office for another 4 years for certain, because Trump would then just be succeeded by another Republican. In any case, the Republicans can win a lot by an impeachment. And I suppose the Achilles heel of democracy has now been painfully revealed.

Yeah irrefutable evidence. 3 waisted years all based upon a phony document bought and paid for by the dnc. Of course you all wont own up to that. Everything that followed that phony dosier would throw serious doubt onto any investigation.The evidence at best is weak and probably wouldn't stand up in courtrooms around the world.You really think the russians influenced the election one way or another with 95000 dollars worth of facebook advertising which was spent on both parties and hillary blew 1.2 billion so we could hear all your crying around the world. As such poor losers with a faulty candidate who has a mysteriously large number of people around her commit suicide. Drink some more of the kool aid huh. Or get a better candidate, no dem is going to beat him with or without impeaching in 2020.

I didn't state irrefutable evidence was presented, I only said, even *if* irrefutable evidence was presented. Notice the grammar here.

And do I believe Russian trolls were hired to influence Facebook and other social media to have influenced the election. You talk like you are one of them. And take words out of context.

And I'm not sure how faulty Hillary Clinton was. The belief she was a criminal was pretty damn high while all her "crime" contained was being careless with e-mails, which is a mistake politicians all over the world make. But the point remains that you took my words out of their context, which you also did with my "fake news meme". And where did you get the news from that people around Clinton commit suicide? Come one, give me your source?

You wasted my time to make me even read your post... troll!

Sorry but i meant if there was irrefutable evidence i dont see everyone denying it. Because there never was any and they knew it long before they concluded the mueller report. Getting peoples hopes up and draging everyone through it. Arkancide is the term i believe you should search on to learn about the clintons but again no irrefutable evidence of the connections. So dont waist your time with that possibilty hey.

My waist is fine, thank you. Not something I ever worried about. I'll seek out a doctor when it's otherwise.

And I've looked up the word "Arkancide", and I end up on no results with the game "Arkanoid" being the "did you mean?" variant. Of course, I hate commenting people on their English, as it's usually done by trolls who had no argumentation anyway, but reviewing your spelling, I must say that you are hard to interpret due to your lack of punctuation, misspelled words and lack of starting people's names with a capital, so perhaps somebody needs to help me with the correct spelling of that word.

And we already know how "innocent" Trump is. The evidence is not irrefutable yet, but that was not my statement. I only said that Trump fans won't believe irrefutable evidence. I am talking about people who deem the story that investigations were running against Trump "fake news" while we all know these investigations took place, so how fake can it be?

No it's Arkancide, a play on murder in Arkansas.
Seems to be much information about it though. So I am suprised to read you get your particular search result. So I copied one link to start with.

https://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2016/08/10/the-list-of-clinton-associates-whove-died-mysteriously-check-it-out/

Sorry about the lack of capitals, its just me being lazy, I an not trolling just learning and trying to teach

All I know is that I still know nothing. These people had relations with the Clintons, yes, and they are dead, and what is the point? As long we don't know how they died we have nothing we can hold against the Clintons, especially not the suicide cases. I admit this seems "too coincidental", but no more details... The article itself already states this is a conspiracy theory, and conspiracy theories rarely hold the whole truth. They are based on a few facts, where many facts that are crucial are missing, either because they are unknown or because they shine too much light on a different truth, and are therefore deliberately left out.
Another thing, this list only lists their relations with the Clintons, any OTHER relations aren't mentioned, and quite often people who are close to (former) presidents have huge networks, and when it comes to gunshots in a country where guns are not outlawed, many theories suddenly become possibly. This all being "too coincidental" is all I have now. It's perhaps the news networks I follow mostly ignore conspiracy theories that this never reached me.

And nobody wants pence as president

I'd never say nobody, but the question is if Pence is a good replacement, indeed.

It would be interesting tho and I doubt he has committed any crimes

You mean Pence? I don't know... He looks kinda boring to me forcing to smile on that picture, but looks can be misleading. As an (upcoming) president your life is always being disassembled to see if you ever did anything wrong. If Hillary Clinton never went for presidency nobody would ever have known about that "e-mail crime" of hers, right? So who knows what will be revealed about Pence if he succeeds Trump due to an impeachment. We all have our "dark side" after all. XD

That is true