Change My Mind

these comments are longer than the declaration of independence

Then how can they possibly be safe if mercury is in the ingredients?

Did you know that if I mix two very toxic ingredients (one will literally set you on fire and the other will just make you die in a very horrible way) together you get just plain kitchen salt that you can just safely put onto your food? And food with 'iron' contains the same iron as the iron used to build iron constructions. Cut short your question shows that you are completely ignorant about chemistry. As soon as atoms, ions and molecules react with each other you get new substances with completely different properties. You'd be surprised how much atoms you'll find in food that are very extremely toxic in their pure form, in which a small amount is enough to kill an elephant, but due to the chemical bindings losing their toxic properties, and to put it even stronger, your heath would get damaged if you didn't eat food with these atoms. Mercury in its purest form is indeed highly toxic, but in due to the chemical bindings it can lose it toxic properties, even to a level to being not toxic at all. Now I don't know if they put mercury in vaccines (can you link me to a RELIABLE source about that), but even if they do that doesn't mean the vaccine is toxic. Chemistry is a big mystery sometimes. Almost like magic.

But the mercury isn’t being combined with any other atoms. Pure Mercury is used to make people weak, sick, and easier to control. Besides combination with other elements, there is simply no healthy form of mercury. And your iron argument was a good point, but a bad example because pure iron is not toxic. https://worldmercuryproject.org/thimerosal-history/mercury-is-not-safe-in-any-form-debunking-the-myths-about-thimerosal-safety/

Pure iron might not be toxic in the most literal sense of the word, still i would really recommend against eating it as long as it's not chemically bound to other elements. I don't think your stomach can bear it. It's still very sharp, not to mention hard. The link you gave me makes me in doubt... I've seen many conspiracy theory pages set up like that, so I need to see if I can verify that page. And pure iron may not be toxic (I need to look that one up, though), but pure sodium is... and let me tell you that when your body is entirely free of sodium, you'll die. Sodium is the content of salt that puts you on fire, due to it being highly reacting with water, and other element was chlorine, which is very lethal), and did you know one of the main elements in human hair is sulphur? Also not something I recommend you to eat in it's purest form. Bromide, all our food is full of it, but if you drink pure bromide, you'll die. And when it comes to mercury, I've been looking up on other sources, and I found a list of more medical practices in which Mercury is used. This source confirmed that most (not all, but most) mercury bindings are indeed toxic, but in medical terms that says little. Antibiotic (used to cure bacteria infections) is also toxic, and if it wasn't it wouldn't even work, as poisoning bacteria is it's primary function. A lot of medication is made out of toxic substances and wouldn't even work if those ingredients weren't used. Sounds pretty odd, doesn't it?

Antibiotics are very unhealthy, though, and that’s how they kill bacteria. As for the other elements, maybe they can be consumed in moderation, I mean, too much of anything is bad. But there is no healthy level of mercury.

The amount of sodium and chlorine in the salt most people put over a fried egg is already enough to be lethal. It's not just moderation, that does the trick, although too much salt can also be very damaging for your health, but not due to the reasons you shouldn't eat pure sodium for.

And to come to a joke, alcohol as found in drinks, contains 2 carbonatoms, 6 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen atom. C-C-O is the order in which the carbon and oxygen are bound. And, although it gets you drunk, you can drink it. When I move the oxygen atom between the two Cs, so C-O-C, all the amounts of atoms are the same, but then we get a form of ether, and that's very highly toxic. Yes, such things matter in chemistry.

Due to the global warming discussion you must have heard of CO2. CO2, 1xCarbon+2xOxygen. All damage it can cause is that it would contribute to global warming. CO, 1xCarbon+1xOxygen is a very dangerous gas that already has claimed many human lives. People are often recommended to have special alarms to measure this. So in this case, less is more toxic.

Now when it comes to mercury I don't know which bound form of it is more toxic than the other. I could confirm that some vaccines (not all) do indeed contain mercury as a preservative, to prevent the vaccine from expiring, and the latter is likely by far more dangerous.

Chemistry is a very nice form of science, but not always in line with human logic, I guess...

I hope I’ll never have to take chemistry...

Hehehe, I did some training in the laboratory school, so I've had a bit of professional training in this subject. Never finished it, but that doesn't matter as I limited myself to the basic knowledge you need to have before you're even admitted to that college.

When it comes to vaccines. Vaccines are medication, and as a rule all medication is always bad for you. The point is the results you get for not taking medication. Take cancer medication for example. The side effects are devastating, but without them, you'll die for sure. When it comes to any sort of medication it's always the question if the side effects are worth the curing or preventing the disease they are invented for. If you know what is used as preservatives in food, you won't be happy either.

Vaccines are invented not only to protect you, but also the people around you. When you can't contract a disease anymore, you cannot contaminate others either, that's the theory. And yes, medication without side-effects don't exist. Vaccines are no exception... It's just that the alternative can be more risky.

Most diseases, though, aren’t nearly as devastating as are most of the vaccine side-effects.

Actually, they are. Measles in particular can be easily lethal... Young children in particular, but also to adult people who are weaker in resistance. And adult men can lose the ability to get their p**is into erection, and can not only take away their possibilities for sexual satisfaction, but also the ability to ever get a woman pregnant dooming them to be childless. Most of the diseases, for which vaccines are given are life-threatening, and/or can cause other permanent effects. It's for a reason that the WHO (World Health Organization) recommends these vaccines and that a lot of physicians (and not only physicians) even plead to obligate them by law. So I daresay that statement is not quite correct.

One can only get the measles once unless he gets the measles vaccine, wherein it only prevents the measles temporarily. And vaccines can also cause erectile dysfunction. Why would one even want to impregnate a woman, anyways? Procreation is the most selfish desire one can possibly possess! But I can totally understand why you wouldn’t want to be unable to have sex.

But if the mercury is bad for bacteria, it must also be bad for humans.

https://hub.jhu.edu/2017/01/11/vaccines-autism-public-health-expert/

There. I have more evidence if you want it.