Imgflip Logo Icon

Statistically half of us would be Democrats, and we're really little guys before we're born.

Statistically half of us would be Democrats, and we're really little guys before we're born. | If Democrats are always for the little guy, Why haven't they made babies a protected class? | image tagged in memes,angry baby | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,140 views 30 upvotes Made by sevenheart 5 years ago in politics
Angry Baby memeCaption this Meme
17 Comments
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Angry Baby Meme | IF REPUBLICANS CARE SO MUCH ABOUT BABIES WHY ARE THEY ALLOWING ADOPTION AGENCIES TO DISCRIMINATE WHO CAN ADOPT THEM? | image tagged in memes,angry baby | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Cite examples please. I think you are stuck in an urban myth, because I personally know Republican couples who have adopted Korean, African (speaking geographically) and numerous "minority" American babies. Letting two gay people raise an adopted child is scientifically documented to not be good for the kids, with such kids experiencing a higher rate of suicide and mental disorders.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You ask me to cite examples but you spew your anti-gay bigotry without one?

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-amendment-congress-adoption-gay-20180716-story.html

Happening in more than Illinois as well.

Just because you know republicans who have adopted minorities doesn’t mean a damn thing
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Ow I'm a bigot. Then you cite a bigoted newspaper. Just because you are an intolerant, non scientific, intellectually challenged, prejudiced, and indoctrinated dupe doesn't make anything you say change the truth. Pfffft!
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
Insults don’t prove your point.

And you still haven’t proven shit about gay couples and adopted children.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Insults? That's the way liberals talk about conservatives every day. I thought it was the accepted form of dialog. Why do I have to prove shit? How about you take a stab at it without using propaganda mouth pieces.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
And I guess the bottom line is why haven't the democrats declared babies a protected class? Surely the most defenseless individuals among us deserve protected status.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1. Not a liberal. Honestly not an anything since I despise politics/politicians and have for a while. Labeling someone a liberal just because they disagree with a conservative is ignorant.

2. You obviously haven’t seen half of the memes in the politics stream to say only liberals take shots.

3. How do you protect someone’s rights, while oppressing someone else in order to do so? You think overturning Roe v Wade isn’t the same thing? I beg to differ.

4. You still haven’t Provided any “scientific documents” that say gay families raise kids with higher rates of suicide and mental disorders than any other family. You ask me to prove something, I provide you one of several articles that discuss state republicans making bills to try to push for adoption agencies to have the right to discriminate who adopts, you call it bigoted even though nothing in the article displays bigotry from the writer, just displeasure with the notion by other politicians mentioned in that article. And then you mock my intelligence like a f**king five year old. So damn straight I will call you out for not citing your bullshit because you STILL haven’t supported your own claim. I’m guessing you can’t because that data doesn’t even exist or is utterly made up.

5. Don’t ask someone to cite something if you’re too f**king lazy to do it yourself too.
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Thank GOD you are not a liberal.
I have a life, I won't waste it looking for half the memes in the political stream.
So you support the right of a woman to kill another human being, obviously babies are not human beings, life doesn't start until the woman says it can, and everyone knows dead babies don't have the right to life liberty or the pursuit of happiness, of course women do. So let's extend the legal illogic of Roe v Wade to say, the police. They could identify as transgender women who are adoptive mothers and therefore have the right to terminate the lives of any suspect they chose. We could call it a societal abortion to rid ourselves of unwanted suspects. Murder is against the law, except in the case of a woman who chooses to terminate the life of an unborn baby, then murder is perfectly permissible. Therefore, murder is not wrong. Kill as you wish. If you identify as a woman or heavens forbid, you actually are one.
You obviously have a computer or a very smart phone, but you can't google. Shame. Because if I wasted my time posting unbiased studies stating the facts you wouldn't or couldn't read them, or you would flat dismiss them. The rates of domestic abuse are higher among gay couples than straight. Fact, but then you support Roe v Wade, so facts don't really mean much to you anyway.
And as for being lazy, no, I'm just intelligent and good looking.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Can’t read something that doesn’t exist.

Your wall of text is a load of hot air. Not truth. You tell me to google shame, perhaps you should google integrity. Your beliefs are one-sided.

Take your side and I’ll take mine. Roe v Wade isn’t getting overturned anyways. Nothing you rant will ever change that.
2 ups, 5y
No, you need a reading for comprehension course. Shame was an individual word expressing the thought that it's a shame you won't google, not imploring you to google the word "shame". The connotation is determined by reading and comprehending the following sentence. This isn't your fault, the people who were supposed to educate you failed miserably. Besides, google doesn't mean you are going to get the truth. Roe v Wade will be overturned because it is horrible law, granting abortion as if it is a Constitutional right that the Constitution does not in fact grant. Breathe easy, because abortion will then return to the states as it should have from the beginning. That way caring and sensitive states like New York can make abortion right up to the moment of birth legal, like they just did. Or states like Virginia can even vote on allowing a mother to decide to "abort" her baby after it has been born, like they just did. Ah Dr. Mengele would be proud. No other civilized nation on earth allows abortion as late as the US (and 6 other totalitarian states).
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Run your mouth and insult me all you wish.

You mock my intelligence but your stupid ass can’t even back up your bullshit claim.

Rant on, troll. It’s about all you can do.

Have a good day
1 up, 5y
whatever, go kill a baby and feel good about having a choice.
1 up, 5y
I can smell the burning crap from here
0 ups, 5y,
2 replies
3 ups, 5y
That's because they are our wives, daughters, sisters, aunts. grandmothers and mothers. That is sooooooooo cliche, time to move out of the 1970's. Everyone knows Republicans live fetuses so our corporate buddies have more people to kill with their deadly products while making obscene profits. Good thing those high and noble democrats support killing babies and ripping their little body parts into shreds and stomping on their heads, after they've made them comfortable for a while. How thoughtful.
3 ups, 5y
If only scientists could figure out how women get pregnant!
Angry Baby memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
If Democrats are always for the little guy, Why haven't they made babies a protected class?