Imgflip Logo Icon

Fight climate change, build the wall.

Fight climate change, build the wall. | WOULD YOU SUPPORT A BI-PATRICIAN EFFORT TO FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE? YES, WE WOULD START WITH A 1500 MILE LONG BORDER WALL, TO PROTECT PLANTS AND WATERWAYS FROM MILLIONS OF TRESPASSERS AND GAS GUZZLING VEHICLES. | image tagged in memes,inception,climate change,build the wall,illegal immigration,maga | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
272 views 4 upvotes Made by BurntFingerForge 6 years ago in politics
Inception memeCaption this Meme
16 Comments
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
2 replies
False logic. Building the wall will do more damage to the land, ground water, and the vegetation in the area of the wall than occurs now. False logic mentioning the cars too as there are few if any roads in some of the areas.
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Save it, I was stationed in AZ, I saw plenty of torn up off roads trails, waste for days, migrants are nasty, the world is better off with out them moving around. Not only that, the coyotes make rape trees to mark the way. If you think a female at any age makes that trip as a virgin you need to wake the F up. The ones that are killed, sold or forced into sex slavery alone are reason enough to build the wall, screw the climate. Let's save people over trees.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
2 replies
dude ur graphic is proposing an environmental solution. u brought up the environment. um did u forget that part?
0 ups, 6y
I used the lib trick every solution has to be linked to the climate change fraud. I really want mines, dogs and snipers to protect the border but I will settle for a nice wall.
0 ups, 6y,
2 replies
It's funny, I don't recall seeing any comments regarding threats to the environment caused by the border obstruction built under Obama.

Also, this a poorly constructed narrative: we can't secure our borders because of the environmental impact that would be caused by securing our borders.

It's so poorly thought out it's laughable. If this logic was actually employed, our national defenses would be unable to protect our interests based simply on the reality that employing our defenses would have some environmental impact.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y
u proposed the wall as a way to begin a bi partisan effort to fight climate change. if u hav a problem with folks commenting on that theme then change the original post. just sayin.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
ok I see u r not the OP. pls talk to the OP abt ur concerns.
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
"ok I see u r not the OP" - aquamarine7
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
u should be pointing out that I find writing too hard. u obvs had an easy enuf time reading it.
0 ups, 6y
0 ups, 6y,
2 replies
I love it when people complain about logical fallacies, then employ logical fallacies to argue against logical fallacies.
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Libs can't handle the truth or facts, use both and their heads explode.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y
hahahahahahahahahahaha
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
2 replies
0 ups, 6y
One time expense, well worth every cent. It will save lives and protect endangered desert turtles.
0 ups, 6y
Inception memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
WOULD YOU SUPPORT A BI-PATRICIAN EFFORT TO FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE? YES, WE WOULD START WITH A 1500 MILE LONG BORDER WALL, TO PROTECT PLANTS AND WATERWAYS FROM MILLIONS OF TRESPASSERS AND GAS GUZZLING VEHICLES.