Danger we're all going to die (someday) but not from global climate warming change propaganda.

And you are sick with those people you call scientists.

Yeah us hicks,what do we know? A friend of mine had 15 minutes extra time booked on a Cray (you can google that dumb ass) after he ran his project, so we crunched numbers on existing daily high records for about 250 municipalities in the US= hence the statement of fact that you piss o=all over. How can you be so arrogant for such a dumb f**k?

Uh just askin' dumb f**k.

good fuucking lord you are a class A,miserable C.U.N.T.

now see there?
that was ME calling YOU a name:miserable c.u.n.t.

go take your childish presumption and fistf**k yourself .
you didn't reveal shit besides a stupid meme...
I have the remedy for that,it's a small pill,but bitter,and hard to swallow.
they call it "getoveryourself".

you wanna make a case?
then make it,otherwise you are shrieking into the hurricane.have fun scooter.
toodles.

And scientists used to say there are 2 sexes with some creatures being asexual- meaning they can reproduce without another of it's type being involved. Everyone believes that, right?
Let me make my case, I worked 35 years in applied sciences, using physics, geology, biology and other sciences on a daily basis. I worked closely with some of the worlds top scientists, I used my observations (scientific method- not modelling) and debated heavily with engineers stuck in linear thinking to get them to try different methods that literally saved billions of dollars and protected natural resources. I complied with environmental regulations and on and on. I even testified in federal hearings to help get a neurotoxin banned (I have letters from a number of left leaning organizations thanking me for providing instrumental testimony that helped them win their case).
This is simple. I have traveled all over the US for work, weather is a critical aspect of my work and I developed a habit of listening to National Weather Service radio. I noticed a pattern (that stupid scientific method again). Everywhere, coast to coast they say what the previous day's temperature was and when the record high and low temperatures were recorded in that place. That pattern repeated over and over again so consistently that when a real scientist told me he had excess time leased on a Cray Supercomputer and asked if I had anything I wanted to run, we ran the database on when high and low temperatures were recorded in 250 municipalities for as long as weather records have been kept. It took 12.8 seconds. So I stand by my statement. When my friend presented our findings it was rejected, you see peer review actually means peer rejection when you prove your colleagues have made mistakes. You don't rock the cash cow on these one song scientists. Whatever you do, trust the media reports and ignore the peer review scandals rocking the publishing world just like they manage to do.

And the vaunted Vostok Ice Cores, surely you've heard of that critical benchmark. Using porosity and permeability science from geology, I asked the question about those factors in ice at a conference I attended. Several friends took the question and proved that Vostok is flawed on that basis, submitted their findings for peer review and the paper was never published. Another Vostok fatal flaw, when are CO2 levels the highest? Late summer and early fall as vegetative material starts to decompose releasing CO2. Now a hard question for you. When does ice freeze? Give up? When CO2 levels are at their lowest.
If disastrous CO2 is going to kill everyone, why over the past 50 years of escalating crisis has the world population grown from 4 billion to 7 1/2 billion? The only starvation on earth is political in nature, not lack of resources.
Why is the bench mark for global CO2 measured on an active, CO2 producing volcano? Mauna Loa, you know, the one that "erupted" and destroyed so many homes in Hawaii a little while back.
And scientifically speaking, CO2 is essential for life, but then you don't care, you trust other scientists.
The science proclaiming man made global warming is not "settled", the propaganda is. I could link to over 600 other studies that debunk it, but you don't care.
BTW how is it you have so many points on Imgflip when I never see an original meme from you, oh- you use the same tactic as Octavia,comment on everything. Do you have a job?

but I am the dumbass right?

look man,i appreciate the time you put in to make your case and attempt to lay it all out.now maybe everything you just laid out is honest and true,i do not know because I do not know you.i only know what you have shown me,and while you don't want to show me nothing,you are telling me everything.

let's look at your original reaction,shall we?

your first "tell" is that my comment was somehow an impuning of you being a "hick".something I never said,nor even implied.this reveals a real sensitivity towards a low perception to a group you identify with,and maybe not that positively.the fact that it never occurred to you that my family would be country folk,and instead just presumed my comment was a disdainful condemnation of "hicks" and therefore too stupid to be a scientist,

is very telling.

the second tell is the insulted patterns of speech you use,as if I had dared question your intelligence and abilities in regards to climate change.which I did no such thing,this is you projecting your own in-securities in the form of offense.

the third tell is you accusing me of arrogance for simply stating I will stick to listening to scientists,and then insult me for being mentally deficient.which again,is simply projecting your own insecurities

conclusion:i do not think you are a scientist.
but I DO,however,think this is a subject you have spent a great deal of time on and have something to say.i can respect that.

maybe next time don't jump into the deep end of presumption with no floaties on and,you know,be a human being and not so damn touchy.

I engage with a very simple rule set.
don't be shitty to me,and I won't be shitty to you.
disagreement is perfectly fine,even welcomed.
I tend not to speak on things I am not very well versed on,and will lean towards those who DO know for understanding.
because at the end of the day,that is all we are trying to do.
understand.

thanks for the replies mate.
stay awesome.

Nice rule, but your trend is to start shitty. Don't believe me, but ask questions based on the facts I've presented. You can google it all, but you have to dig through the propaganda to find the facts. Look up Dr. John Christy, he has crunched the numbers on real data, not computer models and simply presents the discrepancies. He gets crucified. Dr. Roy Spencer (formally of NASA) presents a compelling case that water vapor drives climate more than CO2, and gets crucified. This puts it in a visual context. imgflip.com/i/2nq3ff CO2 is credited with far more reflective power than is possible. If it can reflect so much heat back to earth, it also would reflect an equal amount back to space. The clincher for me is sitting in a climate conference and being told by premier climate scientists that the sun has nothing to do with the temperature of Earth. BS. They lost all credibility with me with that assertion. I spent the best part of my working life measuring parts per million and parts per billion quantities, the 400ppm disaster equivalence is irrational. The earth has had CO2 levels over 2000 ppm and life thrived. The climate is not static, if it was that would be catastrophic because it would seek stasis- everything would be uniformly unsuitable to support life. The settled science of climate change denies the settled science of every other science.
And lastly, how in hell do you find every f**king thing I post to attack it? I can't even find my own shit scrolling through 200 pages.

"Nice rule, but your trend is to start shitty" and "And lastly, how in hell do you find every f**king thing I post to attack it? "

this was puzzling to me because I hadn't recalled us having any issues before this.granted I have no issue going after content,but it is rare I go after the creator.(but,i have done it,i am not a perfect man).

so I did a little digging,and it turns out I have commented on four of your memes (that I could find.maybe you are referring to something else? something I missed? possible).

out of those 4 comments.
3 were referencing the content,and were not even attacking.simply offering a different perspective,and one I was totally in support of your content.

so I don't now what you are a talking about.
care to clarify?
maybe I owe you an apology,but from what I have uncovered,it is all pretty tame.

anyways,thanks for the response and taking the time to offer some counter narrative info.

very cool of you mate.
stay awesome.

In 1950 there was one highway paved all the way across the US- Highway 6. Half of the US was still farmed by horse teams. And cows farted all day every day. 1/3 of agricultural production was feed for work animals. And horses farted more than the cows, all day every day.