and they're younger than thou, presumably, so they'll last longer.

You don’t know how old I am

Free college tuition? How about no college at all - that's just stupid libs tryin' to tell kids how to think and act and get high-payin' jobs n shit. We're better off in the mines, doin' real work.

'Murca.

Give me rednecks any day over you deranged communists. The truly dangerous people are you.

Hello, whinny b¡tch baby!

You're adorable when you're hyperbolic.

When the mines finally rehire them again.

Just like the rest of the bumpkins waiting for the slaves to start picking their cotton and tobacco again so they can have their jobs as overseers back after being laid off for a century and a half.

LOL I have never seen a politician as dumb as AOC. Her district is a ghetto full of illegal aliens, gangs, criminals, and low educated idiots.

Because, apparently, if it's not in the suburbs, it's a ghetto full of criminals and idiots.

Well they elected the stupid communist. They can’t be too bright.

Because anyone you disagree with is a communist. C'mon. Do you even know what communism is?

Whinny b¡tch baby.

Whatever you say, Jeb. Can't beat your trailer park for Ivy League PhDs, right?

Let me know when you run for something other than beer and win.

I bet he's a spoiled yuppie pre-teen from the suburbs.

I dunno, they at least try to pretend they're smart, and use Google.
This dimwit just calls everyone "dumbass" and "libtard." Smells like a typical barely literate hick to me.

And what are your credentials?

My creds include watching you let everyone else piss on your stupid face before you quit.

Any dumb spoiled kid these days talks like that.

But they try to pretend to look smart.
He just looks stupid.

"Try to pretend to look smart"?

That sounds like something kids with upper-class parents would do. The kid sounded more like someone with upper-middle class parents.

But, we both agree that he was just an idiot.

Of course you are going to make fun. I know. We are all just a bunch of low IQ rednecks aren’t we. You have no problem piling in hundreds of low-skilled, low-educated people from the third world.

Wimp.

She represents New York's 14th Congressional District.

Unemployment rate - 5.3%
Median household income - $58,331 (congressional district median is $57,148)
Median home value - $512,100 (congressional district median is $201,600)
Percent of people 25+ who hold college degrees - 26.7% (average of all districts is 31.6%)

Aside from the retail trade and food services sectors (which are among the highest in nearly every district, but are a bit high there), the biggest employing sectors are construction and health care.

The people in her district are pretty close to the national average on everything except cost of living, which is devastatingly high. What district do you live in? I'd love to compare.

Here is something, only 13% of voters in that district actually showed up to vote:
https://www.city-journal.org/html/joseph-crowleys-defeat-15995.html

How many showed up for the primary in your district?

Found it - 55,000 out of a voting population of 595,000. So that's a less than 10% turnout there. Did you vote in the primary? Or did you just blindly trust the Republican Party to pick your candidate for you?

akeller my district is better than that, communist. And yes, calling you a communist is only fair since you are an AOC supporter.

You assume much. I wouldn't have voted for her in the primary, if it was my district. She's too idealist for my taste.

And you'll need to give numbers to back that claim, I think.

You thinking that doesn't make it true. Watch her performance yesterday at the Cohen hearing. Brief, to the point, and with a clear purpose. You may disagree with her, but she's plenty smart.

And even if you're right (you're not, but whatever), one doesn't need to be smart to be idealistic.

No, I bypassed the Cohen distraction hearings to watch my President bring peace to Korea. I have better things to do than watch a bunch of desperate crybaby Democrats conduct some useless hearing with my tax dollars because their Russian argument has fallen apart.

I assumed you didn't watch the Cohen hearing. I'm asking you to watch a very short clip of it.

In reference to foreign relations, our president is playing Chutes and Ladders while the rest of the world plays chess. It's embarrassing.

She is a communist who is trying to convert America into a dictatorship. The danger isn’t Donald Trump. It is Alexandria Ostacio-Cortez

You keep telling yourself that. She's not the one trying to use the military for her own political agenda, bypassing checks and balances.

Your district is better than than your trailer park's septic tank.

- Just kidding, it's not.

Your district is obviously loaded to the brim with dumb yuppies.

My district, DJFox, one of the fastest growing in the nation and the most Republican area of the state:
http://www.nwacouncil.org/our-regions-ranking

"Most Republican area of the state?" No wonder you're so fu¢king stupid.

AR-03 does have the most Republican PVI score in the state. At least, it did before the 2018 election.

Then again, in 2014 and 2016 there wasn't even a Dem in the race at all. In 2018 there was, and he pulled 75,000 votes (32.6%) while only raising 1/5 as much money. While that's still a decisive win, the district doesn't exactly appear to be the Republican stronghold it's been in the past.

Eat this, libtard. You libtarded lying piece of shit.

Actually, stupid, there have been Democrats challenge the incumbent before in my district and do much better than 2018:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas%27s_3rd_congressional_district#2004

U.S. House election, 2004: Arkansas, District 3
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Republican John Boozman* 160,629 59.32%
Democratic Jan Judy 103,158 38.09%
Independent Dale Morfey 7,016 2.59%
Majority 57,471 21.23%
Total votes

2006
Main article: United States House of Representatives elections in Arkansas, 2006
U.S. House election, 2006: Arkansas, District 3
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Republican John Boozman* 125,039 62.23%
Democratic Woodrow Anderson 75,885 37.77%
Majority 49,154 24.46%
Total votes 200,924 100.00

In 2004, the Democrat camdidate got 38% of the vote to the GOP candidate's 59%.

In 2006 the Democrat candidate got 37% of the vote, while the GOP candidate got 62%. So you are wrong on top of being a liberal dumbass.

He was fun to play with. *sniff*

Actually idiot, there was a Democrat candidate in my district’s house race in both 2004 and ‘06. Both of whom got nearly 40% of the vote. So you are wrong. My district has actually got more Republican in the last decade. A lot of it has to do with people fleeing declining leftist states like California.

You still didn’t address how you falsely claimed that my district wasn’t the Republican stronghold it used to be. I showed the numbers proving you a liar you piece of libtarded shit. Nice you got your socks to up you lying post.

I generally don't respond to deleted accounts.

I'm purposely trying to see how far I can push the little bastard. Eventually he might get the idea that he's wasting his time and making a fool of himself.

Looks like it worked. Poor little piggy got his feelings hurt on the interwebs.

Still didn’t address how you claimed my congressional district wasn’t the GOP stronghold it used to be. I debunked your claim, you got 4 likes from your fellow libtards on your debunked claim.

Depends. Will you have deleted your account by the time I'm finished?

Sweet. He finally ran off.

It's a shame - he would have been fun to play with a little longer.

No I will not have deleted my account, but you have nothing to refute anyway.

Prove it. I'll respond in a couple days if you're still here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas%27s_3rd_congressional_district

All of the races going back to 2002 is in that article, moron.

Actually, stupid, there have been Democrats challenge the incumbent before in my district and do much better than 2018:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas%27s_3rd_congressional_district#2004

U.S. House election, 2004: Arkansas, District 3
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Republican John Boozman* 160,629 59.32%
Democratic Jan Judy 103,158 38.09%
Independent Dale Morfey 7,016 2.59%
Majority 57,471 21.23%
Total votes

2006
Main article: United States House of Representatives elections in Arkansas, 2006
U.S. House election, 2006: Arkansas, District 3
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Republican John Boozman* 125,039 62.23%
Democratic Woodrow Anderson 75,885 37.77%
Majority 49,154 24.46%
Total votes 200,924 100.00

In 2004, Democrat Jan Judy got 38% of the vote to the GOP candidate's 59%.

In 2006 the Democrat candidate got 37% of the vote, while the GOP candidate got 62%. So you are wrong on top of being a liberal dumbass.

Still here? All right.

Before 2018, the last time a Republican pulled less than 70% of the vote was 2006. Your stats are correct, but also over a decade out of date - a bunch has happened since then, including an entire presidential administration. With numbers that old and ignoring all the numbers after it, you can make the case that Wisconsin leans blue rather than red. And you'd be wrong.

All of this being said, I'm done fighting with you about your district. You have pride in it, and from an economic standpoint, you have every right to. However, the reason we are even having this conversation is because I said I wanted to compare AOC's district to yours. And you know what? Aside from the high cost of living in hers, they're not that different. AR-03 is doing well, but you don't have the unemployment rate of WI-02 (with a PVI score of D+18) or MN-01 (D+1, basically even). You don't have even half the median household income of CA-18 (D+23) or NJ-07 (R+3), and you're 5 points below the national average in educational attainment.

My point is this - if you're going to start bashing AOC's district, you need to recognize that yours is not appreciably better than hers in any way except cost of living. And that makes you super lucky. Imagine if your home cost four times as much. Your groceries cost twice as much. Eating out cost twice as much. Gas was 50% higher. Child care cost five times as much. And your income stayed the same.

That's the difference between your district and hers. Her people are hurting, and their problems are heavily affected by local, state, and federal legislation. So they elected someone who knows how difficult life is firsthand, hoping she'll affect change.

Unbunch your panties. Everyone is just trying to get by, and doing what they think is right in order to make things better around here. You don't agree with someone else's perspective? Cool. You do you. You treat every Democrat as a communist who hates America? You are what's wrong with this country right now, and you can go f**k yourself.

What did I say that was stupid you dumbass?

The fact that you're stupid is horribly obvious. :/

Don’t believe me here you go:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas%27s_3rd_congressional_district

The same statistics, from the same census data, for this district:

Unemployment rate - 3.3%
Median household income - $47,903 (congressional district median is $57,148)
Median home value - $149,500 (congressional district median is $201,600)
Percent of people 25+ who hold college degrees - 26.9% (average of all districts is 31.6%)

Funny. The sector with the largest number of paid employees in your district? Health care and social assistance.

Congratulations, the Walmart worldwide headquarters is in your district, accounting for 15,000 jobs or so (almost 10% of the entire working population). I'm sure that has nothing at all to do with the apparent prosperity to be found there, and if Walmart decided to place their headquarters elsewhere it wouldn't be devastating to the economy at all. Not that they would, just sayin', y'all have a lot riding on Walmart, and they've been cutting jobs lately.

Wow, way to nitpick, genius. You have nothing real to counter so you pull things out of your ass. We also have other worldwide corporations as well. No, WM probably wouldn’t last in a libtarded district, not enough people who want to work for a living.

And they have been cutting jobs off and on for awhile now, libtarded idiot. I see you left out Tyson, George’s, and other HQ we have. You lose. You have nothing else, so just keep pulling things right out of your ass, libtard.

Your vocabulary leaves much to be desired, as does your knowledge of argumentation and debate. Are you 12?

LOL you couldn’t be more wrong, libtard.

Pardon me while I chuckle at your expense.

hehe

Bored now. Come back when you have something to say that matters.

You came to my board, commie. You will hear me here. Don’t like it then leave.

I just follow the politics stream and call out stupidity when it pops up. I've got no beef with you, personally, and I'm sure not going to go browsing your board.