Hard To Swallow Pills

boomer

it's short for baby boomer

I kinda do....

Breeding:evolution
As
Weather:climate

So....it makes sense who believes what

Ha. Nice one.

Nice boomer propaganda.

So , reluctantly you admit the foundation to that house of cards has a schism?

You mean hyperbole. That junk is only peer reviewed narratives from other junk science. If the empirical evidence supported the theory it would be LAW. IT has had 180 years to be validated and all the support thus far is ; could be, what may be possible, maybe, possible etc.etc.etc.

Thats not true...Peer review isn't evidence. It os used in place of evidence

Thomas Kuhn,philosopher of science has argued that these methods are influenced by prior beliefs and experiences. Consequently, it cannot be expected that two scientists when observing, experiencing, or experimenting on the same event will make the same theory-neutral observations. The role of observation as a theory-neutral arbiter may not be possible. Theory-dependence of observation means that, even if there were agreed methods of inference and interpretation, scientists may still disagree on the nature of empirical data

Statements and arguments depending on empirical evidence are often referred to as a posteriori ("following experience") as distinguished from a priori (preceding it). A priori knowledge or justification is independent of experience (for example "All bachelors are unmarried"), whereas a posteriori knowledge or justification is dependent on experience or empirical evidence (for example "Some bachelors are very happy"). The notion that the distinction between a posteriori and a priori is tantamount to the distinction between empirical and non-empirical knowledge comes from Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

The objective of science is that all empirical data that has been gathered through observation, experience and experimentation is without bias. The strength of any scientific research depends on the ability to gather and analyze empirical data in the most unbiased and controlled fashion possible.

However, in the 1960s, scientific historian and philosopher Thomas Kuhn promoted the idea that scientists can be influenced by prior beliefs and experiences, according to the Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Emerical Data

It's genuinely terrifying that your country's education system is so bad that you don't know science has progressed since the 1800s.