Flat Earther logic

Actual flat earth argument...

Yes, I have heard it all.

Yes, this is true. Pluto will most likely remain a dwarf simply because it doesn't possess enough mass to move objects out of its path. Poor Pluto is just another Kuiper Belt object, but it appears that there may be more than eight planets if you count some Oort Cloud objects that should mathematically exist. Pretty exciting stuff.

Sorry I'm an uneducated sap, but how would mass move objects out of a heavenly body's path? If anything, it would correlate to gravity, which draws things into the body's path, right?

You're exactly right, gravity is directly related to mass. This part was actually debunked in the first part of the 20th century, yet it is still used as a criteria for demoting Pluto.

I'm genuinely surprised since I always thought I was such an astronomy flunky. Of course, the real problem was that Einstein was wrong about so many things that the Masonic establishment that scripted his also plagiarized formulae are still pushing on us. Tesla was right about Einstein being a complete Wizard of Oz type. Time is not a fourth dimension, nor are there fifth etc.; rather, what is real is what they used to call the fifth element or aether and what we now call the Higgs field or the God particle. Science from 1910 was a total lie, all to snow over the inconvenient truth if the Michelson-Morley experiment. So that made me feel better about being a "dunce", but I still feel like I know precious little about what and who is out there in "space" or more appropriately "aether".

Nonsense, you seem to be well versed. Michelson and Morley were really on to something though. We now know that the speed of light isn't constantly and really isn't the universal speed limit once you understand the math involved. However, light is strange. We can actually change how reality behaves just by looking at it a different way.

The Double Slit experiment shows us that a single photon can split into two pieces and go through both slits at the same time. A single photon can actually be in two places at the same time.

Unless you add a photon detector, and then the parties act like bullets.

Just one of those things that nobody can really explain. Pretty interesting stuff.

It's damn interesting. What I'm unclear on are the parameters for the wave-particle differentiation? Does a person have to be watching? Will a camera suffice? How does this factor in with the weight of the soul and the Higgs field? But yeah, no matter how Masonically cheapened our grasp of physics is, light is still a mind-f**king mystery!

By my understanding...and I'm not a quantum physicist by any stretch of the imagination...is that there are really no real parameters, General Relativity at its finest. No matter how you look at it the result appears to be the same unless you capture it with something, like a detector. I'm sure the Higgs has some impact because in order for a photon to act like a bullet otherwise and pass through space it would have to have mass (which brings into question how they can pass through matter without disrupting the matter, like going through a window without breaking it). Without mass there can be no acceleration, which would make photons immoveable. That brings up a whole lot of other questions that I can't answer.

The camera idea is interesting though. I've never thought about that. These are some of the things that keep me awake at night.

What if all structured scientific approaches, like their predecessor systematic theology, constitute an imperial political construct more than a window to reality?

What if "I'm not a [establishment] quantum physicist" actually reads "I'm not a data gatekeeping mind snatcher" in practice?

https://phys.org/news/2018-09-pluto-reclassified-planet.html

Well, we will know more once all of the data is put together. But from what I understand so far Pluto may have plate tectonics and volcanism. So irregardless of its mass it very well could qualify as a real planet again. It was downgraded when Pluto was nothing more than a fuzzy little dot in the eyepiece.

“Regardless” or “irrespective” not “irregardless”....don’t be that guy.

Sorry, it's been a long day and I've always been passionate about this stuff. Been teaching my students about the solar system for a long time.

It's in a polar orbit around Mandalore.

Flatearther finally finds out the truth

Plot twist: They're ALL flat!