But That's None Of My Business

There's that idiot language again. Tax cuts don't cost. It's the people's money, not the Governments. Entitlement programs COST.

Tax cut or public expense... too hard to tell the difference, I'll just vote democrat

It's not an expense, it's the people's money. Entitlements are a public expense.
Don't be an idiot, vote straight Republican.

heh heh failed attempt at sarcasm. I get bad at words this late at night. Def voted straight republican tho! Red tsunami a'comin!

So why was Obama's tax cut such an extreme cost? IT WAS A TAX CUT!!!!!!
It was negative and bad because there was a black man in office.

Part of the problem with Obama's tax cut was where it got directed. Businesses didn't directly benefit from it, small ones particularly. Thus they still couldn't hire anyone. I received his tax cut...30 dollars. I stimulated McDonalds with it and that's about it. When coupled with the restrictions he put on small business the tax cut he gave out to the people had little effect. The unemployed definitely saw no benefit...those who made below 50,000 saw no benefit, because there federal tax is near zero anyway. So, to give money away in such a way that there is no immediate benefit is just irresponsible. Trump's tax cut was aimed across the board, and businesses benefited greatly, and as a result so have the employees they've hired, all the workers involved in the growth investment, and on down the line. Workers' wages are going up right now at the highest rate in over 10 years, out pacing inflation, and that is due to companies having more disposable income. Right after the election in 2016 our company finally released its plan to double its size by 2022, due mainly to the improved economic outlook. Once the tax cuts were passed we acted and are 1/3rd of the way there.

There is nothing in your comments that is truthful. Wages over the last year have gone up .1 percent. Since Trump became president, wage increases have flatlined. Trump did absolutely nothing in his tax cut to spur hiring. Was there a hiring stipulation? NO! Only a cut, to do with as they saw fit. The vast majority of companies are buying back stock with the windfall. 15,000 autoworkers are seeing buyouts to reduce the workforce. Everything you said, is a JOKE!

I saw $40.00 bi-weekly with Trumps cut. That won't fill my tank. A tax cut should be targeted toward companies willing to grow and invest in greater workforce numbers. Tax them ZERO if they increase their workforce by a certain percentage, I have no problem with that. Trump simply did a give away, with no incentives for investing in people. NONE!

Thank you all for proving the point of my meme!

You're full of it dude. Entire industries are reinvesting in their employees, their equipment and office space. We can't grow fast enough. You don't even read the job reports do you. Your little .1% remark is a joke. When you you take in overall incentives. Hell the tax cut alone gave a helluva lot more than that. Anyone not benefitting from this economy must be a serious loser. We literally had to raise our starting wages across the board for every new hire and still can't find employees. Available jobs in the country outnumber the unemployed for the first time in my lifetime...and people are still bitching. The vast majority of companies in the country don't even have stock and the ones that bought stock back are doing so to strengthen their companies. Plus once it's back they still retain the cut for the following year. The job reports say it all...records across the board.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/02/october-jobs-report-economy-wages-956838?fbclid=IwAR2HUAIIizmZo0PRPc7ec-WWz-mqIr48ma7RQ1gqeSCPguW42rRDVoDIbjY

CNN shared a post.
42 mins ·
JUST IN: The US economy added 250,000 jobs in October, and the unemployment rate held at 3.7%, the government announced Friday. Wages grew 3.1% after years of stagnant paychecks.