You don't know that.

You don't know he's muslim.

How can you be so sure he isn't Muslim?

So your calling him a Muslim based on the way looks that is very islamophobic losing to your own logic smh

No it's not. You don't know he's not a Muslim?

But you also don't know that he is so therefore there is no evidence in favour of either of our ideas

True. Radical "Christians" are no different or less savage as bloodthirsty murderers than radical Hindus or radical Muslims or radical Jews or radical anyone else - and murder and terrorism has been done in the name of every single one of those. Every single one - and the difference to the victims was zero.

All it takes is the right political or economic circumstances, and you can "radicalize" any of them. Without exception.

I don't care who claims to have first taught the "golden rule" of treat others as you'd be treated, I look at who's actually practicing it. That's what counts.

The irony is, you can find this basic simple idea buried inside of probably all of them too.

You must mean radical liberals. You know,the nut jobs how shoo up workplaces, sporting events, social gatherings, political leaders and, schools.