I'm not making this up, this teacher said it himself - on mainstream source TV. That means that the non-conspiracy version story is complete bull:
This is a teacher. Who was shot at by the masked guy in SWAT gear. Who got kids to safety. He's not imagining it. He's not lying. He's not making it up. There was foreknowledge BY the authorities BEFORE the event. That means it didn't just happen. It proves there was orchestration. Period.
Sorry if it bursts anyone's bubble - really - but it IS a pattern, this IS the truth, he DID say it, you CAN see it for yourself. It is NOT going away, and it WILL come out no matter HOW hard the controlled corporate media like CNN and Google struggle to suppress it.
Watch him say it. It is a fact. It is a pattern with these events, they do "drills" to as contingency cover. And only the stupid are fooled by it. Don't fall for the "Oh, I'd never believe in a conspiracy" programming they try to make you think is your own thinking. Don't be fooled.
If all you can think is "oh conspiracy, it could never be true," wake the f*** up :-/
I see no reason why "the authorities" would plan a terrorism drill for the same day they supposedly knew there would be a "mass killing event."
It strikes me as more likely that "the authorities" would NOT plan a drill for the same day as a pre-planned "killing event."
Rather, the existence of a "mere coincidence" makes people who are predisposed to conspiracy-thinking to see meaningfulness in unconnected coincidence.
Even more importantly, such coincidence would not be acceptable as "inculpating evidence" in a Court of Law because it doens't prove anything: it only serves as a trigger for conspiracists to spin self-satisfying yarns.
To learn more: http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2018/03/the-thinking-housewifes-passion-for.html
Your "Thinking Housewife" is a chump for straw man arguments, for example arguing an MD would be offended at the suggestion an AR was not used.
She is a fool and does not think.
The issue is not that one was not used, it is that it was not used by Nunes. He was observed and spoken with by a fellow student who knew him. While shots were happening. On the other side of the school. He was NOT carrying any kind of weapon.
On the other hand, the history teacher in the video WAS fired at by the guy he described as wearing a mask. Which makes him probably the same shooter others described as wearing a SWAT/riot gear outfit.
This is consistent with numerous other events with similar suppressed secondary agents.
Worse, for the bullsh*t official story, I've watched interviews with BOTH a student who said they were warned there was going to be a live shooting drill AND the history teacher.
When a credible witness tells you they were informed there would be a shooting drill with guns and "blanks" earlier in the day before it happens - go watch him say it yourself - that PROVES foreknowledge and conspiracy.
And this drill "coincidence" has happened at LOTS of other events, from the London bombing (at all the exact stations!) to the Boston Marathon and dozens more.
Not even a time machine can rescue you from your factual predicament. Occam's razor is a practical guide - and yields in the face of one confirmed fact. Which you have in the interview.
