scroll on if You' re up to a funny meme

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4895713/teacher-joshua-sutcliffe-suspended-facing-sack-transgender-pupil-girl/

tyvm

in case the link gets cut:
google 'Teacher Joshua Sutcliffe suspended'

I'm starting to believe that the gender confusion really does have its roots imbedded in natural causes and that the universe is using it to rid itself of the pesky human race.

anyway- we are moving to the next meta-level now.
We're no more researching gender behavior but why people build up such an ideology up to it.
The newspaper-article gives evidence that 'gender-mainstream' is much more an ideology or religion than a science.

The larger the population numbers get, the larger the raw numbers get and the more of a feeling that certain behaviors are normal just because of the amount of vocal support. Then the crowd mentality takes over.

Population growth is an opinion-shaper, true. More people means more difference. I personally am not sure I'm with the crowd mentality argument. As I told ArcMis above I view it as a free-will question, devoid of any moral argument. There are things we do today and take for granted that people 100 or 200 or longer ago would've been horrified and offended by. There are pluses to crowd-thought; sometimes the things that become normal lead to a better-functioning society. An example I've thought of, while not exact to this particular case, is one of the agitation against Uber/Lyft. Taxi companies are against it, defending their own turf of course, but using the argument that taxi services are a good source of middle-class jobs. Fine. By the same measure should there have been a law passed banning the combustion engine because horse-led Hansom cabs were a good source of well-paying jobs? Things change. Even the most hide-bound of traditionalist wouldn't demand that women go back to wearing (ankle length) dresses only. I know gender issues seem different and more extreme, but so did the idea of women wearing pants at one time.

That the teacher apologized should make it case-closed. But, yeah, it's a ridiculousness that is being overly ingrained as an ideology. That said, I personally don't give a rat's a$$ if a gender-bending woman wants to sh!t in the same toilets as me. When I gotta go I gotta go. My view on it is not science or ideology or 'religion', it's one of free-will choice. A person wants to be another sex? Fine. Their choice. It really doesn't affect me, but then again I'm live-and-let-live and have no emotional skin in this fight. The one thing I do oppose is both ends of the political spectrum making this do-or-die; the danger is in letting the closed-minded take over the debate. Time to open societies. If you don't want to p!ss next to someone of the opposite sex then use another bathroom. The solution to the toilet question? Single-seater rest rooms. Problem solved. But the ideologically laden don't want the obvious solution. Both left and right want something to stir their masses. Open society? Do what you want and if something bothers you (but doesn't directly harm you) then go over there...

Thanks for Your thoughts - to the bathroom-issue:
In Southern Europe countries and in Russia they're using squat toilets. Single-seaters would be peed on - French, Italian, Russian men would not sit down. The squat toilet actually is clean&hygienic. Although it takes some more coordination pooping.

XD I've lost much of my co-ordination to age. I'll stick with seating, unhygenic or not. :D

stay well !

Thank you. You too. :)

thx.

;)

Depends on whether I'm in a hurry or not. :D

Yes gender confusion does have it's roots in natural causes, there are as many unique sexual preferences, identities and chromosomal normalities as there are human beings. The modern paradigm is the interconnected world. Everybody carries a pocket device that gives them access to the internet and by extension the ability to have their voice heard, for good or bad. The vitriolic debate is fuelled by the polarising nature of the same world, nobody debates or reasons in cyberworld.

good point.
I've heard about some ovservations with - was it mice ?
If kept in an enclosure and population growth comes to it's limit they mint various sexual behaviours.

I don't believed the teacher should be at risk of getting fired (if he hasn't been yet). However, I don't think the "gender confusion" is going to end humanity. There are 7 billion humans in the world, and "gender confusion" isn't going going to end the world as quickly as a thin-skinned liar with access to nukes.

You really need to progress an argument without cheap attacks on the other party. You blew what was sounding like a rational discussion on a single topic.

What did I say that was a "cheap attack"? Isn't what you're doing right now a cheap attack?

"There are 7 billion humans in the world, and "gender confusion" isn't going going to end the world as quickly as a thin-skinned liar with access to nukes. Whether you are aware of it or not, its a distraction from the subject.

I can agree there. I did go a bit harshly. I do like a bit of edge when I debate.

You know I've never mind getting into it with you:) In fact often you make good points that really make me think about my position. Then you let emotion take over and get away from your strong reasoning. I see it all too often on TV and have really started paying attention when the pundits debate. They will make 3-4 outrageous claims in their turn in hopes that one or 2 go unchallenged. Therefore these become fact because the weren't rebutted.

Same here. :)
Good point, I do let emotion take over me. It's a pretty good tool to get the others riled up (which is usually my intention), and I think it's better to show some emotion and empathy for those I try my best to defend.

I will say, for the sake of cheap attacks, that it'd be too cheap for me to call everyone I debate a "normie", like Cynnicynna probably would (because it seems the majority of people on this site use dead memes), and it'd just give my opponent the lower hand for being normal.

I heard about this. Good for him for having enough dignity not to respect a dumb snowflake's pronouns.

The teacher apologized for the incident (even though he should not have had to) and it was the only time he slipped up. Yet, they still pushed for disciplinary action against him. That makes them "snowflakes".

Good job getting on the weekly leaderboard!!! Next I’m going to have to be keeping an eye on you :D

thanks for noticing !
take a look on my today's submission:
imgflip.com/i/23zeao

Np & thx

good job getting in u 2 !

Thx

Having to give in to someone's mental illness.