Not going there, just quickies.
I'm independent, not conservative, so I can point out hypocrisies in any "side".
Compared to her, WE are penny ante - and also not power-structure-allegianced, which are the two factors that actually count, so my point stands.
Emoluments is a tu quoque, Hillary made emoluments famous with her pay-to-play arms deals with the Clinton Foundation, so I'm not impressed. Deal with that first, and we'll talk.
Never liked Kushner, he puts Israel way before America, but that doesn't validate your Hillary claims.
I'd argue the gringos you bitch about are an example of selective sampling, or in effect a reverse racism, of which anyone is capable. I'm not Trump's fan, but remember he was RIGHT in saying illegal immigration included criminals and rapists. He didn't say everybody, and I didn't see any Latino talking heads saying he has a point, we have go get the coyotes that rape the poor emigrant girls and hang their underwear in a tree. And dealers here probably get a lot of their meth from gangsteres chicanos too - remember los Zetas, Mara Salvatrucha, Latin Kings, Sinaloa, all those nice tipos? The job destruction you refer to is the effect of internationalization and globalization, not capitalization per se, because many of the jobs were simply recreated abroad. The problem for Americans is the export, and don't forget muchos latinos are the beneficiaries of those job exports too. So I don't have much use for double standards.
In short: it's delusion to say Hillary was actually better. She's FULLY in bed with the CFR and the dark power structure you never see. Useful to keep in mind, I think.
Paz.
