Steve Harvey

If someone you know said they are going to come over to your house and shoot you, and you know they have never owned a gun in the past, are you just going to wait until they come over and pull the trigger before doing anything, or are you going to do something to try to stop them before they get to your house?

How about you answer the question. Would you wait until someone pulls a gun on you and shoots you (whom you didn't think owned a gun) before you do something, or would you call the police and have the threat dealt with? It really is a simple question.

doesn't matter what I would do with your hypothetical. Keep up with the war mongering

It does matter. You only refuse to answer the question because your answer is would be to stop them before they shoot you, regardless of know whether or not they have a gun. So it just shows how hypocritical you are. And I am not talking about going to war. I am talking about just wiping out their entire leadership. It will take them years to rebuild, and there will be a possibility that the new leadership would be thankful for us getting rid of their old leaders for them. Never said we should send troops over there for years like with Iraq. Maybe you should understand what someone wants to do before claiming you know everything and start labeling them.

And you are simply saying let them do what they want and risk having them send bombs of any kind here. Considering you were the one who started debating with your first comment, you are one to talk about trying to claim I am some high school kid practicing for the debate team. You always have the option of leaving my meme and not responding if you don't like my opinion. Each time you respond only shows that you want there to be a debate, but your responses reflect your lack of the capability of intellectual discussion as you are incapable of answering simple questions. You just spout off with attacks when you have absolutely no idea what I was proposing. Who knows, it could work out better to just take out the leadership and let them deal with the aftermath themselves, the other way didn't provide any good results. I would rather take out their entire leadership now verses waiting for them to start killing us before doing anything. You can't tell me that if you had the opportunity to prevent someone from mass killing everyone you know that you wouldn't do whatever it takes to stop them, I guess that is unless you are just a cold hearted bastard and is the one planning on doing the killing yourself.

What are you missing in my comments? I never said that we needed to do the exact same thing we did with Iraq, in fact I am saying the opposite. I am saying that all we need to do is take out the leadership and leave. How the f**k is that nation building?

So if you don't support any of those 3, how about you f**king state who you would support? Unless you are going to continue to be a little cock sucking bitch and just keep running your f**king mouth on shit you clearly don't have the intelligence to talk about.