Steve Harvey

Steve Harvey Meme | HOW MANY TIMES SHOULD NORTH KOREA BE ALLOWED TO THREATEN US WHY NOT JUST TAKE OUT THEIR LEADERSHIP NOW AND LET THEM KNOW WHO THEY ARE TRYING | image tagged in memes,steve harvey | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
947 views, 26 upvotes, Made by anonymous 8 months ago memessteve harvey
Steve Harvey memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Futurama Fry Meme | JUST KEEP SENDING THEM FREE TACO BELL SHIT UNTIL THEY SURRENDER | image tagged in memes,futurama fry | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
ONE DOES NOT SIMPLY SEND THEM TACO BELL WHEN WE CAN SEND THEM THE B.B.C. BARNEY BIEBER CLINTON | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups
I'LL TAKE THE CLINTON.... ON SECOND THOUGHT, I'LL TAKE CLINTON AND BARNEY | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
It'll be a fun threesome
reply
2 ups
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
WHAT IF I TOLD YOU THE RULING CLASS LIKELY DOES NOT TO GO TO WAR BUT IF THAT HAPPENS THEY WILL PUSH THE BUTTON | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
1 up, 1 reply
press the button on what? their electronic bottle rockets?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
All you need to successfully nuke someone is a primitive missile like the V2 that can carry and detonate the nuclear payload. If you miss the US base by a mile or two or if you hit Tokyo or Seoul, you took out between 100,000 to 10,000,000 people with a miss.
reply
1 up
well, I don't think they have anything except for hand-me-down SCUDs, that might carry a payload, but I don't know the specs, and they wont hit the US that's for sure
reply
1 up, 2 replies
So why do you believe N Korea has nuclear ICBM capabilities?
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
Why does it matter. They are threatening to attack for no reason. Doesn't mean they have to do it with Nukes. What if the had something like the MOAB, would you still just wait until they drop it on us before saying something should be done?
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
If someone you know said they are going to come over to your house and shoot you, and you know they have never owned a gun in the past, are you just going to wait until they come over and pull the trigger before doing anything, or are you going to do something to try to stop them before they get to your house?
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
How about you answer the question. Would you wait until someone pulls a gun on you and shoots you (whom you didn't think owned a gun) before you do something, or would you call the police and have the threat dealt with? It really is a simple question.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
doesn't matter what I would do with your hypothetical. Keep up with the war mongering
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 2 replies
It does matter. You only refuse to answer the question because your answer is would be to stop them before they shoot you, regardless of know whether or not they have a gun. So it just shows how hypocritical you are. And I am not talking about going to war. I am talking about just wiping out their entire leadership. It will take them years to rebuild, and there will be a possibility that the new leadership would be thankful for us getting rid of their old leaders for them. Never said we should send troops over there for years like with Iraq. Maybe you should understand what someone wants to do before claiming you know everything and start labeling them.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
And you are simply saying let them do what they want and risk having them send bombs of any kind here. Considering you were the one who started debating with your first comment, you are one to talk about trying to claim I am some high school kid practicing for the debate team. You always have the option of leaving my meme and not responding if you don't like my opinion. Each time you respond only shows that you want there to be a debate, but your responses reflect your lack of the capability of intellectual discussion as you are incapable of answering simple questions. You just spout off with attacks when you have absolutely no idea what I was proposing. Who knows, it could work out better to just take out the leadership and let them deal with the aftermath themselves, the other way didn't provide any good results. I would rather take out their entire leadership now verses waiting for them to start killing us before doing anything. You can't tell me that if you had the opportunity to prevent someone from mass killing everyone you know that you wouldn't do whatever it takes to stop them, I guess that is unless you are just a cold hearted bastard and is the one planning on doing the killing yourself.
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
What are you missing in my comments? I never said that we needed to do the exact same thing we did with Iraq, in fact I am saying the opposite. I am saying that all we need to do is take out the leadership and leave. How the f**k is that nation building?
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 2 replies
"Keep drinking the kool-aid. Must be a Trump supporter" Would rather support Trump than support Killary or Adolf Sanders. How about you either stop commenting on my memes or you comment that shows you have an IQ that is at least in the double digits.
reply
2 ups
I like this guy, AnimationFun, you are a true American
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
So if you don't support any of those 3, how about you f**king state who you would support? Unless you are going to continue to be a little cock sucking b**ch and just keep running your f**king mouth on shit you clearly don't have the intelligence to talk about.
reply
[deleted]
3 ups
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
It is more of what we did after taking out the leadership that caused the problems we have today. Trying to force our government and views onto them and sticking around for years afterwards was the problem. Had we just eliminated the leadership and left it at that, like I think we should do with N.K., the chances ISIS and other terrorist factions wouldn't be the problem they are today. It wouldn't be any different that what many have thought about doing with our own government, remove everyone in office and start over.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
We don't have to kill to remove our leadership. Slightly different in other parts of the world.
reply
2 ups
huh? you mean Their leadership, and their leadership doesn't really deserve to live anyways, he's wasting oxygen and cake
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
If we wanted to do a complete wipe without waiting for an election, how many do you think would just leave withoit putting up a fight? Many politicians get reelected because no one is running against them, and there is no option to vote for just getting rid of them. So there is a possibility the only way to do a complete wipe to start over here would involve killing some. So it really isn't that much different in other countries. There, even those people have no control to get rid of their leadership. So why not help them by eliminating their leaders for them, if those leaders want to threaten us, and let them rebuild on their own?
reply
3 ups
Flip Settings
Steve Harvey memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
HOW MANY TIMES SHOULD NORTH KOREA BE ALLOWED TO THREATEN US; WHY NOT JUST TAKE OUT THEIR LEADERSHIP NOW AND LET THEM KNOW WHO THEY ARE TRYING TO MESS WITH
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back