One Does Not Simply

One should not simply be just as upset enough to make a meme

True, True, my friend

Yeah, but no one actually tried to impeach Obama. The Dems in Congress have already written articles of impeachment for Trump and as for Bill Clinton he was impeached for lying under oath.

Clinton also had the obstruction of Justice charge against him, which is what I believe the Democrats are basing their articles of impeachment.

They're basing it on whatever they can pull out of their behinds. I swear, if Trump saved a baby whale from dying they'd find a way to spin it like "How dare he interfere with the environment!"

Trump would use that whale's oil to lubricate your ass while he pounds it and tells you its "Fake News" when you complain.

You kiss your mother with that mouth? I bet you do and now we know what you think about when you do.

The crazy part is that the Republican leadership will allow it. Why? Trump was elected because he was the outsider. The GOP can't control him. He get's impeached and what happens. Assembly line GOP politician Mike Pence becomes president. Trump elected to buck the system, but the system will buck him. The people that voted for a non-establishment president will end up with an establishment president.

I'm sorry but trump is no outsider. He's as wrapped up in politics as the rest of them, even worse he's wrapped up in foreign govts because of all his financial interests. What's unprecedented is Trump's indebtedness to these countries like Russia and the UAE.

And don't forget his statements about bribing public officials. Still, he hasn't held public office before the presidency, which is one reason why he was considered an outsider.

This, colluding with the Russians to interfere with our democracy, that is an attack on the very foundation of what makes our country so great. This goes beyond fooling around with an intern in the Oval Office. People were completely enraged over that and that was nothing next to treason. Trump is selling us out to a vicious, murderous, communist dictator. We should all be concerned....

There is zero evidence of what you just said, whereas It was a provable fact that Bill Clinton lied under oath. Stop listening to CNN and MSNBC.

Zero evidence of his collusion or his selling us out? You don't know for sure that there isn't any evidence. I guess we will have to wait and see...

You're right I don't know for sure but Comey does he said so under oath. Take the red pill holmes

Even your beloved comet said he wasn't under investigation.
The establishment wants him out and they've brainwashed you guys.
Just sad!

Not too long ago you said to me that there already is evidence. No you are putting it into question as to whether or not there is evidence? Make up your mind.

I believe there is evidence. The fact that he's even under investigation at all might hint to that. But like I said, I doubt you'll acknowledge, admit or believe if and when it all comes out. I do think right now there are a lot of dots we can connect...

http://billmoyers.com/story/the-trump-resistance-plan-a-timeline-russia-and-president-trump/

You believing there's evidence and actual evidence being there are two ENTIRELY different things. That's the problem with the regressive left, you base everything off of "feels" which is the EXACT point of my meme in the first place. Thanks for proving my point numbskull!

And what is the basis of your denial of the events as listed in the link I provided? What evidence can you offer to prove that Trump really doesn't have Russia ties? Show me where It was proven that Kushner didn't really meet with Kislyak, didn't really ask for a back-channel of communication? I stated that I believe that what had been shared with the public is true. What is your denial based on other than your own feelings? You can call names and try to degrade my opinion all you want but ultimately you're just trying to belittle me personally instead of talking about the topic which is our current President, not me, not his opponent who lost the election and is no longer an issue...

Absence of facts is not guilt. I don't have to show any evidence that he didn't because my whole point is: There is SO FAR (if it comes out he did I guess I will own it) but you are trying to get me to say that there' s no evidence he DID NOT. That's not how things work. For example: Prove that you DID NOT beat off to porn today? Did you? Can you prove you didn't? Sounds like a witch hunt, doesn't it?

Did you even read the timeline in the link?

Hey MauiOnion, are you really Rachel Maddow? Because you make the same stupid argument she does: Here's a premise, maybe it happened but now prove it didn't. There's a reason she reads a teleprompter for a living and doesn't litigate, because her arguments, as yours are built on the premise that someone DIDN'T do something. Is that the world you live in? That if you can't prove someone innocent they must be guilty? I would hate to have known you in Salem in the old days.

I should correct myself, sorry. What I meant to say is this: Your premise is that I have to prove he didn't do something.

Good grief now we're talking about Rachael Maddox? Is that all you Trump supporters can do is try to distract by pointing the finger at someone else who's completely uninvolved ? Look at the connections, the meetings, the cover ups, the denials of talking with or being paid by Russians. Look at the investments by Ukrainians and Russians with Purim ties. He's neck deep in Russian money.if all that is true. Add to that the fact that he still won't release his tax returns. Follow the money trail. Trump is all about money. He doesn't care about you, me or this country. His companies, holdings and investments. That's who our president is truly presiding over.

A lie told once is still a lie.
A lie told a thousand times becomes truth.

Okay genius, I looked at your link and all it shows it that Trump as a PRIVATE CITIZEN did business with Russian PRIVATE CITIZENS. Nothing illegal there. Doing business with Russian businessmen is not the same thing as colluding with the Russian government. Not only that but your link reinforces in my mind that Trump was a forward thinking businessman. In 1979 at the height of the cold war he had enough foresight to know that someday we would be doing business with the Russians. Thanks for the link. It shows how smart Trump is and how stupid you are.

What real evidence is there that Trump was involved with the Russians? Even if he was involved and Russia was able to somehow interfer in the election, shouldn't thise who were in charge of the security of the election be charged for making it easy enoigh for Russia to interfere? And even if Russia did anything, then you should also have an issue with how Hillary was using a private server that contained government information, which was unsercured and easily hackable. If she was president today, she would probably still have a private server and keep the codes for the missle launches on there.

I don't know how much more evidence you'll need. Maybe for him to just admit it? Perhaps not even then. I, personally, have heard enough about his ties to Russia and of the connections with members of his cabinet.

You know what there is evidence of? Hillary when she was Sec of State had Mueller give the Russians a sample of uranium. Just one of the tidbits that came out of her email leaks

She's still not the president and hasn't collided with a foreign power to interfere with our democratic process. What's next? We start putting our soldiers in harms way by helping Putin fight his wars?

She "colluded" with a foreign power (Russia) when she was Sec of State. You are seriously delusional. Talk about cherry picking info. And frankly, I'd rather help Putin fight his wars AGAINST terrorism, rather than arming ISIS, which Obama and Hillary did, than fight Russia itself.

You need to stop getting your news from Trump's tweets ...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/mar/28/fact-checking-donald-trumps-tweets-about-hillary-c/

And that's how you handle problems af

Start listing it, because nothing I have seen has been conclusive enough to say that he was involved with anything.

Read the timeline in the link I posted. It's all there.

I read your timeline it's BS. It only shows that Trump did business as a private citizen with private Russian citizens. If he did anything wrong they would have busted him back in 79 or 80 under the trading with the enemy act. If what he did is so wrong how come the dems aren't attacking him for it? After all, it's all right there in your timeline right?

Private citizens with strong ties to Russian banks AND Putin. Do you deny that Russia interfered with the election? Do you deny they hacked the DNC? Did you hear Trump inviting them to hack Hillarys emails? Have you heard the way Trump kisses Putin's ass like he's in love with the guy? What about Manafort and Kushner? Flynn? They're all being investigated right now.. Everyone is freaking out because Hillary used her private email. Can you imagine if she and her cronies had the same connections to Russia that Trump does? You'd be calling for her head on a platter. ...I guess we'll just have to wait and see if Trump will have to answer for what he's done... ?????

I wouldn't worry about Hillary's connections to Russia as much as I woukd worry about he connections with Muslim middle eastern countries. Did you know that there was a sizable amount of her campaign funded by terrorist countries? Of course you wouldn't believe that because Trump is the traitor not Hillary.

And for the record, no I don't believe Russia hacked into the election. If they did and wanted Trump to win, why only give him the electoral votes and not popular votes as well?

And if they hacked the DNC, why not cover themselves and hack the RNC? Maybe it was made to look like the DNC was hacked to try make it look more plausible the election was hacked as well. Maybe the DNC was hacked, but the democrates are not well known for having tight security on their servers. And even if the election was hacked, why blame Trump? Maybe Russia just didn't want to deal with Hillary and so they did it on their own accord. What about all the people that are in charge of security on the servers for the election? Why are they not to blame? And even if they did hack the election to give Trump the electoral votes during election day, did they also threaten all those who were responsible for the final electoral votes to finalize his win in December?

Yeah ain't nobody got time for that. Because nobody has time to write that piece of fiction.

First of all Hillary has way more Russian connections than Trump has. Second of all I don't have to deny anything. You are making accusations. In this country as most western countries, the accuser must prove guilt, not the other way around. The burden of proof is on your hands.