Fools

Foolish analogy

Right wing extremists have done more harm to this country since 911, than anyone else. American citizens have killed more American citizens, in this country than any "Terrorists" have. Obama was right to apologize, after the 8 years of terror that Bush inflicted on the world. Now we are known to the rest of the world as the country of hate and racism. The values that YOU voted for, since Trump never campaigned on any "conservative" platform. Red meat and fear were his tactics, and weak minded fools fell for it. The country is a complete embarrassment in this world now.
If Trump had run as a Democrat, I wouldn't have voted for him. His own ignorance is overwhelming and he has no leadership qualities. The Republicans have been the party of the rich for decades. I'm not rich. I have no use for them. They are not looking out for the American people or their well being.

And when the democrats get powet, and you see the world around you being burnt down, you'll look back on this moment, and realize just how stupid you are.

Really? Wasn't it Bush .... a Republican.... that started 2 wars? One on a lie, and one...to hunt down 1 man.

No. Any other questions?

Why ask a question, if you only have lies for answers

You mean the war Osama Bin Laden started on 9/11 and the war Sadam Husain started when he invaded Kuwait?
The BS about Bush starting these wars are the lies. Don't fall for them.

History doesn't lie..... but stupid Republicans do. We didn't need either war. President Obama proved that, when his seal team got bin Laden. You know... the guy that Dick Cheney said........ "We never could pin 911 to bin Laden".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3Ywq7jYAqI

Hindsight is alway 20/20.
Your sound clip doesn't show the context of his statement. But then, it wouldn't fit your "all republicans lie" agenda.
And what makes you think that killing Bin Laden several years later proves we didn't need to go into Afghanistan (a war Obama believed was necessary).

Warmonger Bush said we were going to Afghanistan to get bin laden. But in 2005 he also said he "didn't think much about bin Laden" anymore. He was just happy to be involved in some war... any war.
Destabilizing the Middle East is what opened the door for ISIS to form. ISIS was the reason Obama believed it was necessary. Just trying to clean up another Republican mess.

Obama supported going to Afghanistan when he was a senator -- long before ISIS. Are you really that clueless or are you hoping others will believe your bogus history?

It's apparent that you don't have a grasp on reality and just want to make false statements about Republicans. Do you also believe Democrats are warmongers and liars? If so, at least your demented sense of reality would be balanced, but I'm guessing you're an Obama deciple who believes he and the rest of the Democrats can do no wrong.

Good luck trying to convince people how bad Republicans are. With nothing to back your statements up, you won't convince anyone except other clueless people like yourself.

@ fools-Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"No one has done what Saddam Hussein has done, or is thinking of doing. He is producing weapons of mass destruction, and he is qualitatively and quantitatively different from other dictators.""Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of

Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi (born 1968), known by the Defense Intelligence Agency cryptonym "Curveball", is a German citizen who defected from Iraq in 1999, claiming that he had worked as a chemical engineer at a plant that manufactured mobile biological weapon laboratories as part of an Iraqi weapons of mass destruction program. Alwan's allegations were subsequently shown to be false by the Iraq Survey Group's final report published in 2004.

Despite warnings from the German Federal Intelligence Service and the British Secret Intelligence Service questioning the authenticity of the claims, the US Government and British government utilized them to build a rationale for military action in the lead up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, including in the 2003 State of the Union address, where President Bush said "we know that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had several mobile biological weapons labs", and Colin Powell's presentation to the UN Security Council, which contained a computer generated image of a mobile biological weapons laboratory.They were later found to be mobile milk pasteurization and hydrogen generation trailers. On 24 September 2002, the British government published its dossier on the former Iraqi leader's WMD with a personal foreword by Blair, who assured readers Saddam Hussein had continued to produce WMD "beyond doubt".

On November 4, 2007, 60 Minutes revealed Curveball's real identity. Former CIA official Tyler Drumheller summed up Curveball as "a guy trying to get his green card essentially, in Germany, and playing the system for what it was worth." He lives in Germany, where he has been granted asylum.

In a February 2011 interview with the Guardian he "admitted for the first time that he lied about his story, then watched in shock as it was used to justify the war."

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html

"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)

The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government’s invasion rationale.

After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Mr. Bush insisted that Mr. Hussein was hiding an active weapons of mass destruction program, in defiance of international will and at the world’s risk. United Nations inspectors said they could not find evidence for these claims.

Then, during the long occupation, American troops began encountering old chemical munitions in hidden caches and roadside bombs. Typically 155-millimeter artillery shells or 122-millimeter rockets, they were remnants of an arms program Iraq had rushed into production in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war.

All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.

In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find.

As Iraq has been shaken anew by violence, and past security gains have collapsed amid Sunni-Shiite bloodletting and the rise of the Islamic State, this long-hidden chronicle illuminates the persistent risks of the country’s abandoned chemical weapons.

because they were old, doesn't mean they were not dangerous. most icbm's are pre 1991, are they not dangerous.my uncle is a 35 yr atf agent and the son of a democrat politicians, lifelong democrat, he said those become more dangerous with time.I wont go into to details for safety reasons but he said that a few of them had the potential to wipe out tens of thousands of ppl under the right circumstances. Do I think bush should have gone in? at the time yes, just like numerous democrats including Bill Clinton(and me at the time, D) . Had one of those chem wmds got into the wrong hands and been used and Bush did not go in, ppl would have been screaming for bushs head. My family friend is very good pals with Al gore and we asked him what he thought of iraq (at the time) and he said "dammed if you do, dammed if you dont" . Its funny, the democrats first said there was no wmds, now they find them(in unstable shape) and now he gets the blame for not giving troops enough training and equipment .I am not sticking up for bush really, I didnt vote for him(or his dad) but you cant blame the guy for both completely opposite things.

Never said they weren't dangerous. Said they could not be used as intended.

well my uncle who is a 35 yr atf agent, life long democrat, son of a democratic politician begs to differ.

To each his own.