Hold on, I think I see what you're saying, but maybe I just wasn't being clear. What I'm saying is that some people claim that there is no evidence of the supernatural, so God must not exist, but some, SOME, of those same people also believe in ghosts. I'm simply pointing out that it is not a valid argument to say that God can't exist, "because there is no evidence of the supernatural," because ghosts are in the category of supernatural.
Making that argument, you either have to believe in both or neither.
Also, I didn't say that there was any evidence for God; that was another guy. I literally just said in another post, in this forum, "In my opinion, there is no scientific possibility of a god. Don't get me wrong, I do believe in God, I just believe He exists outside the realms of science."