Joker Everyone Loses Their Minds

No proof? That's OK leave everybody thinking it while we find "it"

17 Government and private cyber security teams have stated the Russia definitely hacked campaign servers on both sides and only released the DNC stuff. The CIA, FBI, NSA among them. The FBI has a full report on their website and it does not mince words. But I guess the FBI and CIA are not part of the Alt-reality crew so, ignore them. When were the 1 million records the Chinese stole stolen? I only remember cases like this in the 90s and 2000s...

LOL, the Chinese thing was ALL over the Alt-Left news in June of 2015. Is the Washington Post Alt-Left enough for you? Google is SO easy to use and it returns 533,000 records for "chinese government hack government employees."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/chinese-hackers-breach-federal-governments-personnel-office/2015/06/04/889c0e52-0af7-11e5-95fd-d580f1c5d44e_story.html?utm_term=.461c17ca535e

Go do your own research. I don't have time to do it for you. The Russian "hack" was from an IP address in Russia. It doesn't mean it was the Russian government. I can make my IP address look like almost anything I want. Really easy.

It was announced by the Alt-Left New York Times that the Russian’s alleged involvement in the hacking – suggested by the CIA – is baseless. HAHAHA! It's crumbling right before your eyes but you and the other folks just don't see it.

“[The Russian’s involvement is apparently based on circumstantial evidence and] does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election,” the New York Times reported while citing a number of U.S. officials.

Remember the chain of blame:
First Clinton blamed her own top campaign officials for her election loss
Then it was suggested that it was voting fraud and Clinton supported Jill Stein's push for numerous recounts.
When those collapsed, it became "the Russians." Even though Julian Assange has repeated confirmed that it was the swiss-cheese security of the DNC that allowed multiple hackers to get the information out to the public through Wikileaks.

I agree that there is a rush to judgment based on a political slant/agenda. The slant is all about shifting blame for something Clinton provably did (set up a private unsecured server and stored Top Secret-Compartmented documents, among other acts) to something that Trump hasn't done but the media (which is run by a bunch of alt-left hacks) has gone to extreme lengths to draw dotted lines to 'connect' unprovable claims. The tip of the iceberg isn't the election, it's the Beghazi 9/11 attacks.

That's where the chain began. When Benghazi was being investigated, it led to the emails proving that Clinton was deliberately ignoring the security situation there.
The Benghazi investigation began the search for additional emails, whereupon Clinton stalled and generally interfered with the congressional investigation into the server that they discovered Clinton had.
Evidence like Clinton's handheld devices were destroyed and the server equipment used was wiped with digital countermeasures software to further impede the investigation.
It was learned through the email investigation of the incestuous relationship between Clinton's State Dept. staff and the Clinton Foundation and the conflicts of interest between Clinton's State Dept. duties and her dealings with foreign governments through the Foundation.
By this point, all the investigations were weighing on Clinton's election bid and that's where the election rigging was happening between the DNC and the Sanders campaign. When that was exposed, regardless of the source, there should have been an immediate FEC investigation, but by that point Bill Clinton was meeting secretly with Atty General Loretta Lynch to put the fix in on anything relating to Hillary. This was also with the blessing of Obama, who could have called an independent IG to look into that meeting - but he didn't.
By this point, Hillary was sagging in the polls, and she openly queried "Why is it that I'm not 50 points ahead like I should be?" The unspoken answer to that came on election night when incredulous newscasters, who were openly supporting Clinton and making no pretense toward objectivity, were forced to announce that Donald Trump was the new President-elect. It wasn't till then that the Clintons started trying to spin their national security violations and the DNC's nonexistent digital security into a sinister plot on the part of Donald Trump in collusion with the Russians. The whole narrative is simply a grand alt-left conspiracy theory.

Speaking of alt-left conspiracy theories, the Clintons are experts on that. Let's not forget that Hillary was the one to speak up about "a vast right-wing conspiracy" against her husband. She was ignoring the fact that people were waking up to the corruption in DC and using the internet to inform and educate others in a way that was not possible before personal computers. Of course, any excuse had to be given to keep the sheeple on the left from asking uncomfortable questions. I won't try to dissect the reasons why the Democrats lost the election last year. I'll only predict that as long as the GOP doesn't go and shoot themselves in the foot like they did during the Bush years, the GOP will solidify their gains in 2018.

I have never seen Americans so eager to defend a foreign power that is openly hostile to us. Have you no sense of country sir? The Times piece was early on. Again, the FBI has a full report on this. The CIA and FBI and all of our security agencies are in agreement about who did the hacking. You can't spoof your IP to fool the FBI. I doubt you even know what you are talking about. You would need access to a smart router or server in Russia to do this anyway. Nice hat. I also see the WaPo article, that did not mention stealing any national sec data. But, they have in the past that is for sure. What they have not done is f**k with our elections, which at the behest of Trump, Manafort and others, the Russians did. You reference Julian Assange... who is he again and where is he?.. Yeah, what I thought.

Typical. Attack MY patriotism because there's no evidence of the "Russian hacking" that Obama's asshats in the government claim.

Who's defending Russia? All we're saying is show us the proof. And "proof" isn't because the Obama administration said so. That's just asshattery.

But you still can't seem to address the fact that even the Alt-Left NYT admits there was no hacking going on like what they WISH happened. Even Julian Assange said that any 14 year old could hack the DNC because of its hilarious lack of security.

Your credibility: GONE. Obama: GONE. Clinton: GONE.

You just can't admit it and admit that your candidate was flawed and beaten by ... Donald Trump! I still laugh that "the most qualified person to ever run for the Presidency" was beaten by a brash New York real estate developer and reality TV star who won the popular vote in 30 key states.

Try this: Google "russia didn't hack dnc" and read a few of the latest reports. It will hurt, but it's the therapy you need.

Try a .gov source DHS/FBI - Here is a link to the report. Here is your proof. https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY%20STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf

It's been debunked by tech guys. Already read it. It's a joke.

Well that makes perfect sense.. I would side with Russia and some random "tech guys" over the cyber security teams of the FBI and DHS. Perfectly reasonable. To paraphrase Sam Harris; Those who do not base their beliefs on fact or reason, can't be persuaded by fact or reason.

The problem is: you have no facts, only supposition, suspicion, and a president determined to undermine the legitimacy of the president elect.

If you understood anything about technology, you'd be on my side. The evidence for a Russian hack on our election is non-existent. An elementary analysis on the IP addresses included in the report showed that those IP's emanated from 61 countries and 389 different organizations with no clear way to attribute any of them to Russia.

The data in the DHS/FBI Grizzly Steppe report has what's known in the tech industry as “indicators of compromise” (IOCs) which you can think of as fingerprints or cookie-crumbs that hackers left behind. The IOC’s in the "17 agency report" are tools freely available on hacking websites and are loaded with IP addresses that are used by hackers around the world. There is very little Russia-specific data in the US government report.

What's really funny is that If you find an IOC that is in the report on your own company network (or your private bathroom server), it is unlikely that you have been targeted by Russian Intelligence ... they're FAR too smart to leave those crumbs behind.

But sheep listening to the Alt-Left aren't that smart and will believe anything that their Alt-Left masters tell them.

And no one is "siding with Russia." That's just further evidence of your bias and refusal to examine the facts.

The PHP malware the report provided, for example, is freely available for anyone who wants it.

More reports coming out this week from CIA.. the Russians did hack both the DNC and RNC.. I guess they are banking the RNC stuff for later. I am an original tech guy. My certs are expired but I held MCSE Admin for NT4.0 and Networking. Our 17 agencies have to be careful not to reveal sources and methods. However, for all of them to sign off that this was a Russian operation is pretty remarkable. Time will tell. I don't think this is going away.
Stay tuned as they say.

It's going away. It will end on Jan 20th.
And we all know Obama has NEVER politicized any intelligence or any agency's reporting ... </sarcasm>

Your .gov sources were all headed by Obama-appointed, pro-Hillary bureaucrats, and that's just the political reason why their reports are being discounted: They're telling people what Obama wanted them to say, to undermine the President-elect. A man who is staying in DC to continue to actively undermine the current President in an unprecedented manner.

You are crazy, you do know that right? I'm so glad there are fewer and fewer of your tin foil hat, conspiracy fake news consuming clan. Stay classy.

Staying classy in your book apparently consists of resorting to ad hominems to deflect from the fact that you don't have a valid argument. The fake news is the CNN swill that comes from the mainstream/lamestream media, carrying water for those who would actively do harm to our country, either in foreign affairs or domestic unrest. I look at all the SJW snowflakes out there and have to laugh, but only for a moment because it's pretty well documented that when all you libtards lose every argument and at the end of the day you have nothing left to stand on, nothing left to do but go out and incite or initiate violence. It just proves how bankrupt the left has become, all you people are the very deplorables that you accuse everyone else of being. I'll stay classy but all you can do is roll ghetto style. I'll see ya at the barricades; I'm outta here.

If I were a snowflake, as you say, wouldn't violence be the last thing I would seek? I see I touched a nerve pointing out that you clearly sound deranged. Is it that you see that you are actually wrong and can't destroy your self identity by looking there or are you legit mental? Even your name screams, "I'm a pussy". Offering to "see me at the barricades", what is that? And I love the "ghetto style" throw in. So, you are a racist too? Crazy, racist, and phony is no way to go through life kid. So, do you think I am black? Am I? Does it matter? Get some help. Travel outside of your home state or abroad if you can. Learn. And always, stay classy.