More liberal logic

Actually they are still wrong. Trump got 62,972,226 in the popular vote, which surpasses Clinton's 62,277,750. He won by almost seven hundred thousand votes in the popular vote and over seventy in The Electoral College. The Electoral College votes were 306 (Trump) and 232 (Clinton)

Actually, that is often the case.....

you should see the county by county map.

More if ya move 10 million fruitcakes in

considering most fruitcakes get shipped from great aunts in the midwest, seems like we just need to get the postal office involved..

lol

These crybabies just need to quit whining when they don't get their way.

[image deleted]

its like saying they should win because they got more votes from actual people instead of an arbitrary, broke system. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wC42HgLA4k

It's more like someone losing a game of football because they had more goals, but not in the right part of the goal.

*because

Be honest. Trump supporters would have complained just as hard if the opposite had happened.

Honestly yea but we would have accepted the outcome of our democracy not try to change it or riot in the streets

Would all of you have done that? Especially when Trump has often claimed that the system is rigged and that Hilary should be arrested for the email thing. It's not like all or even a majority of Hilary supporters are protesting. And an even smaller amount are violently protesting. I'm not saying that all Trump supporters would riot if Hillary won without the popular vote. I'm saying just as large a percentage of them would. Both sides have violent people. I don't want to sound judgemental but I'd argue that Trump's side has more gun owners. Also (I personally wouldn't judge Trump supporters on this) but whether Trump supports them or not the KKK adamantly supports him. Any actions they took in such a situation would have been considered the actions of Trump supporters protesting the election.

Well actually the KKK is owned and used by the democrats and they have them endorse republicans as to make them look bad a racist

The democrats are the real racists, they just hide it. The reason they don't enforce illegal immigration laws is so there will be a permanent underclass that they can take advantage of.

Ok try this their pandering to minorities, using them as a smoke screen to make them seem so caring while they destroy our country from within has successfully, with help from the Soros paid media, brainwashed people like you by the millions

And the Democrats are supposed to be thr mad conspiracy theorists.

You're trolling.

No I'm truthing

"Klan leader claims KKK has given $20K to Clinton campaign
‘For the KKK, Clinton is our choice’.... " http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/26/klan-leader-claims-kkk-has-given-20k-clinton-campa/

There's only room for one renegade here.

It's the extreme left groups, funded by people like George Soros, that are to blame for the rioting. These were the people who incited violence at Trump rallies.... Since no inciting was done at Hillary rallies, I would not expect much, if any, violence and rioting if Hillary won. Secondly, Hillary supporters (and worshipers) were 100 percent expecting her to win; but Trump supporters had some doubt Trump would win. (Largely caused by the in-the-tank Media hyping that Hillary had a constant lead, and their constant trashing of, and downplaying Trump). So when she DIDN'T win, this gave birth to the 'snowflake' phenomenon, and it triggered Soros-types to do what they do best -- create anarchy and chaos....

Well said! Freaking hate Soros!

Also, keep in mind, the 'paid' rioters always 'recruit' (encourage) non-paid protesters to join-in with the violence.... This is simply using 'mob mentality' principles.... So, not all the rioters are paid.... They could hire like 20 to 50 'goons', and that could in turn incite hundreds and hundreds of protesters at a particular event, to commit violent acts... People like Soros' goal cannot be to 'win over' the general public, such as family people, the elderly, etc., who would (and should) likely instead become appalled and terrified by the violence and could likely turn against the protesters (and what they stood for)... However, the college-types and those already inclined to 'rebel' LOVE stuff like protests/riots -- to them, it is primarily an 'event', and the 'cause' is secondary.... And, since these people often already are in contact with large social organization (a university, etc), it's pretty easy to get the crowd numbers...

yes, i admit i voted wrong in retrospect.

I really hope Trump declares Soros an enemy of the country, forbids him from doing any business here, and seizes his assets here.

Because you have a degree in domestic and international law or your just pulling stuff out of your ass, as usual? Soros has engaged in RICO violations, conspiracy across state lines to start riots.

Soros uses multi-levels of 'buffers' between him and the violence/subversion itself.... This is of course deliberate, and will be the problem in going after him.... Maybe Julian Assange can help out here?

No, not really. Most of us understand the way things work in this country and we don't riot and burn businesses and beat people up when we disagree with them. We might complain about Hillary's cheating to get as far as she did, but most of us don't need therapy after an election.

I think, yes, there was cheating on some levels.... It just wasn't enough, because they failed to fully recognize how much they would need.... Whenever there IS cheating, they would almost certainly want to keep it as little as possible, in order to secure a win.... You'd never see anything like rigging to such a degree that would make it very obvious

She didn't win and you're still acting like she cheated. I have trouble believing you.

*Cough* she did *cough*

It was proven she had SEVERAL voting bots/machines setup to give her votes.
Now, I don't know about the system itself; but of that, I am sure.

She also had questions in the debates sent to her and interview questions given to the media to ask Trump. That's part of cheating as well.

Because she did cheat. Having illegals vote for you is cheating. She got away with it against Sanders. And no one from the Trump side is bashing people's faces in because they voted for Hillary.

Why would they. Trump won. Actually when I tried to find a case of someone bashing peoples faces for voting for Trump I found this instead
http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2016/11/gay-man-reportedly-bashed-trump-supporters-minutes-election/
But I don't blame Trump supporters for that and I don't take responsibility for what Hillary's supporters do http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/trump-supporters-targeted-in-vicious-attacks/. If you want to claim that a few violent protesters represent Hillary's supporters then you have to be willing to take responsibility for the actions of everyone who supports trump including the KKK. I don't think you should have to do that but don't pretend all Trump supporters are more reasonable than Hillary's supporters.

Actually Trump came out and denounced the KKK's endorsement of him. And he also said racism as a whole has to stop and wouldn't take any racist organization's endorsement.

And I do lump the majority of Hillary supporters together as either whine bags, violent whine bags, or hypocrites. At least the supporters that are in the spotlight, like dumb liberal celebrities and news anchors.

Hillary never condoned the actions of violent rioters so you're kind of setting a double standard here. If Trump acts like he doesn't like them then you don't have to feel grouped up with them. These are the Trump supporters in the spotlight. If you group liberals up like that then you should accept being grouped up with these kinds of people. Also you seem to write off everything bad said about Trump as political slander. Evidence of Trump being racist goes back to the 70s long before he went into politics. There's no conspiracy against him. He already got the supremacist vote so he could afford to mildly rebuke them. He got sued twice for discriminating against black rental candidates. He stated that Gonzalo Curiel could not be unbiased because he was mexican. There are more examples. Anyone can say they hate racism but actions speak louder than words.

Donald Trump is not racist. And most of those who voted for him aren't racist, either. You seem to forget, or you just don't want to hear it, that many of those who voted for Barack Obama, also voted for Trump. You think those who voted Obama in 2008 and 2012 weren't racist until now? Bullspit.

You claim there's evidence of Trump being racist as far back as the 70's, but I can give examples of the democratic party being racist as far back as the civil war.

Did I ever imply that all the voters for Trump were racist. I think I've been very careful not to imply that. I merely made a point about how grouping people like that is bad and that you shouldn't do it. Also you want to bring up history about dead people in the democratic party while I'm merely bringing up history about Trump. You seem to cherry pick facts to support the idea that Trump himself isn't racist and that all his opponents are terrible for saying that he is. As if there's no evidence for it. Well there's a lot of evidence for it. I even gave you examples that you're pretending never happened. It doesn't really matter. He got elected and he's president now and I honestly don't think he'll screw the country up too badly. He'll probably do a number on the Supreme Court but it's not like he'll bring back slavery or anything.