Creepy Condescending Wonka

I would sooner trust Trump around my kids than Either Hillary or her Pedophile husband Bill.

So you're saying you'd trust him at all?

Compared to Bill and Hillary, Trump is a saint... not that its much of a comparison.

So the answer to the question is...

It was Hillarys husband that had/has Internal Problems...

But both Bill and Trump have demonstrated themselves to be predators... No thanks to either

Trump is not a "a predator" thats extreme exageration. Bill on the other hand is. Just search Bill Clinton + Jeffrey Epstien + Lolita Express and see

Trump and Hillary equally unfit.

Hogwash. TRUMP IS MORE QUALIFIED BY FAR.

Sorry you imagine that's true. His record and behavior during the campaign (not 11 years ago) have demonstrated clearly his lack of moral judgement and character. He's Obama with an R beside his name. An empty suit unworthy of the office.

Hillary is bad too, so common sense people will have to find a write in candidate.

WRITE IN IS JUST ANOTHER VOTE FOR HILLARY ALSO.

But a write in is also a vote for Trump then so it balances out. Write in benefits/does not help them equally.

If all things were truly equal that might be considered true but the Electoral College is allready planning to vote Democratic side... and using the media to cover up whats going on... the only way this will become obvious to America is if the popular vote proves the media is lying.

"1st we have not had 1,000,000 elections that we could have a 99.9999% result."

A little nitpicky there right? And it would 10,000 elections, not 1,000,000 to get to .9999 granularity. But since there are 50 states voting each four years we've had a lot of data!

"2nd the popular vote has been contraviened 4 times in our history... not just once."

So what. National popular vote means NOTHING. I never said it was only one time though. Just that it happened then. You read into it something that I never said or implied.

"3rd You stated the EC has their vote prepared even the day before the popular voting..."

I never said anything of the sort, not sure how you imagined that. (Oh wait! I see I had a typo!)

I meant the people vote and in most cases (99+%) the state's winner is known on election day or the day AFTER (not before). (Since I said it was due to the votes, it was clear what I meant even with the typo of course). The EC won't cast their votes until weeks later, so even if there is a challenge in a state, there is time to resolve it.

But the EC cannot and will not fake anything as you're stating.

For anyone who cares... "The meeting of the electors takes place on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December after the presidential election. The electors meet in their respective states, where they cast their votes for President and Vice President on separate ballots."

No contradiction. Please explain what makes you think I did.

1st we have not had 1,000,000 elections that we could have a 99.9999% result.
2nd the popular vote has been contraviened 4 times in our history... not just once.
3rd You stated the EC has their vote prepared even the day before the popular voting...

Not sure where you get that nonsense... Each state will send its Electors based on the popular vote in the state. It's perfect as it was established. The EC couldn't fake the vote if they wanted to.

No... but the popular vote can be ignored and EC does not always wait for it anyway.

You said "No... but the popular vote can be ignored and EC does not always wait for it anyway."

Again, untrue. In 99.9999% of the cases the popular vote winner will be resolved on election day in state if not the day before. The EC does not convene until several weeks later to formally cast their votes.

The national popular vote is 100% irrelevant to the election. Gore had the popular vote in 2000, but Bush won the Electoral Vote as the FF established it.

You just contadicted yourself..

LOL! Not even.

Its not about trusting him with women , I trust him to make America Great Again, and bring back jobs, secure the nation, and elect a constitutional judge to the Supreme Court ! Way More important in my opinion.

And what in his background makes you remotely think he'll do those things? His history is liberal.

Because ...A: He sees it as a challenge to do for America , and B: He knows the voters will hold his feet to the fire.

That's funny.

You think greatness is somehow separated from this sort of thing?

Trump isn't remotely interested in America.

I disagree...He has seen what has happened to our country and manufacturing and he isn't a career politician , so he gets credit for stepping up and trying to do something!

I would like to see things from your point of view, but I can't get my head up my ass!

That's exactly what you should do...get it out of !