Third World Skeptical Kid

You're comparing apples to oranges here. But by all means, minimalize the sexist, mysogynistic, degrading comments and actions, made by a person who is supposed to lead and be a role model for the future youths.

While you're minimizing Trump's faults, don't forget to also minimize his open encouragement of espionage against the US and her citizens. And minimize his willingness to sell out the US to Putin and Russia. You'd also have to minimize how many of his shirts & ties are made overseas (all of them). Oh, and minimize how many times his business have failed (six and counting, losing at least $1,000,000,000).

Almost forgot to remind you to minimize Trump's tax shenanigans like using his unlicensed charity to settle business debts and paying zero federal tax two of the five years for which full records are publicly available, as well as up to eighteen years for which only a partial record exists.

That's great info. So what do you got on Hillary Clinton. It's only fair for you to list her faults as well and decide who is the lesser of two evils. At this point I would never vote for neither of the two, but much less Hillary Clinton. But like, it be nice to list Clinton's dark side as well.

Well she oopsed a few dozen emails, which we know for a fact would have been spied on had they been stored on the State Dept server. The Clinton showed no sign of having been compromised, but the emails were backed up on the State server anyway. I should note here that former Bush administration officials like former AG Alberto Gonzales commited similar offenses and recieved no "real" punishment either.

As for Ben Ghazi, I think Trey Gowdy summed it up pretty well when he admitted that the central point of his inquest was BS. Even if troops had already been loaded in an Osprey that took off the instant anyone knew about the attack on the consulate, they'd have arrived in Ben Ghazi in just enough time to put themselves in danger attempting to rescue four dead bodies. This admission is a matter of public record.

Good info, I respect that. I just happen to think there's more behind the Clinton curtain that we don't know about, and that the Clinton's wouldn't want us to know. As for Trump, the fact is we already know who he his, it's well known that he's a business man, and has been exposed for his bad business before, and that he's sexist pig. The issue is how Hillary is a true politician who has stuff that she'll lie about and hide just to look good in the public eye. Sadly this is the poorest collection of candidates for the presidential election that I have ever known in my life.

I think a lot of that is that the press continues to hammer Clinton for being less than perfectly transparent while giving Trump the benefit of doubt, when they're even seriously covering his campaign and not treating it like a circus sideshow. One example of the latter is how Megyn Kelly was criticized for practicing good journalism and calling Trump out on his statements about women (who were not Rosie O'Donnel).

The Clintons have been under public scrutiny for over two decades now, so I can understand their reluctance to divulge anything especially seeing how the press can take a seemingly innocuous statement so far out of context that the opposition uses it in an attack ad (Bill Clinton's recent speech about the ACA).

Do I love Clinton? No. But she's preferable to any other candidate, including Jill Stein and Gary Johnson. Will my vote matter? No. I live in one of those Red States Republicans can safely take for granted every year.