Creepy Donald Trump

He already did.

Everyone, except only children, have had a miscreant sibling attempt to shift blame when they got caught. If his goal was to make voters migrate from the Clinton camp to his, this might be a strategy, albeit a lame one. His goal, as I see it, is to stop the bleeding in his candidacy. Invoking Clinton's well known sexual addiction to justify his behavior is a loser. The people who have judged Clinton negatively, are not likely to look the other way.

The hypocracy is Clinton supporters who, all the sudden, feel offended by Trump's actions toward women and believe it makes him unfit to be president. Yet they didn't feel that way when Bill was president. You can't point fingers at Trump without pointing them at Clinton too.

I have no problem criticizing Bill Clinton for having consensual affairs with women while he was President. He appears to be a classic sex addict. He also appears to have accepted that he has a problem and has worked with his family to deal with it. But, what Trump says he did has been described by lawyers as assault. Grabbing a woman's Pussy and expecting to get away with it because you are a "star," eclipses anything that Bill Clinton did. I believe Trump is unfit to be President because he doesn't know how many Articles make up the Constitution. All of the racist, sexist and religiously intolerant stuff he said after that confirmed he was too bigoted to be a fair leader. The unbelievably ill advised suggestion that we not live up to our treaty with NATO and allow many other countries to have nuclear weapons convinced me he would be a reckless leader. The latest bile from him, just makes me sad. He very likely has put the Republican Party onto a road to oblivion to feed his own ego. I like a healthy competition of ideas.

It's too bad you don't see a problem with a married man having an adulterous relationship. Yes it was conceptual but it's still wrong. Of course he wasn't the first President to do so and unfortunately won't be the last. As for Trump, he's a creep too. His only redeeming virtue is that he didn't bold face lie about it to the American people. Also, while what he said he did is discusting, at least he only said it and didn't do it as far as we know . . . Yet. But I find it hypocritical of Democrats who brush off what Bill DID as no big deal while condemning Trump for what he SAID.
But if you feel Trump is unfit to be president for the reasons listed above then you must also think the Clintons ar unfit to re occupy the White House too. Hillary has proven her incompetence through her handling of the Benghazi attack by not only showing lack of leadership but then trying to cover it up with the bogus YouTube video nonsense. She also showed us that she can't be trusted with classified information. Her "reckless" use of her home email server and attempted coverup (do we see a trend here?) by deleting emails and repeatedly lying about not using it for classified information should have landed her in jail. At the very least she should have been fired and not allowed to hold another government job. Yet so many people are content to just ignore this and put her in as the CEO of the government. Add to that all of the scandals that continue to haunt the Clintons and you can see why those who point fingers at Trump while supporting Clinton have their head in a hole. There's no way you can condemn Trunp for his actions without equally condemning the Clintons for theirs. I personally think they're both unfit to be president.

Wow. You are all over the place. The first point I'd like to make is that I do not approve of Bill Clinton's relationships. He has worked through the problems they caused in his marriage, and that is all that really matters. All of the evidence is that these affairs were consensual. On the other hand, Trump said that he was able to do a specific thing that was sexual assault. In fact, there was a case of a woman accusing him of specifically doing that to her, but it was dismissed as a "he said, she said," case. Now that he is on tape saying that he was able to grab women's crotches without asking, it may be appropriate to re-visit that case.So, it isn't just that he said he did it, he was charged with that specific act of sexual assault. When I was in the Eighth Grade I learned about the US Government. I learned that the Department of Defense, not the Department of State was in charge of the military. That would mean that the Secretary of State would not have the power to order a military stand down, if one was issued. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who does not answer to the Secretary of State, has testified that the military was responsible for all responses to the Benghazi attack. It is probably just a coincidence that General Carter Ham's subordinates complained about his alcohol use affecting his performance of his duties. He was responsible for Benghazi security. My late brother worked for NSA, as did a good friend of mine. I know that many times a cover story is invoked after an event like Benghazi. This allows for people working for us to slip back into the background before they can be detected. In the long run, we will know the truth about Benghazi. Remember, they blamed Kennedy for an air support issue that was found to be not true after the Bay of Pigs after action report was declassified a few years ago. If you buy into all of the allegations against the Clintons, you must think that our law enforcement agencies are completely incompetent. If they had done a fraction of what they were accused of they would have been prosecuted. The bottom line is that Hillary Clinton will be elected on November 8 and if the Republicans maintain control of Congress, they can obstruct her like they did Obama and we will not get the government we pay for.

Hillary Clinton took personal responsibility for the security at the compound, or rather, a lack thereof. She also deleted thousands of emails from her personal sever, presumably to get rid of evidence. Of course you didn't even mention her email scandal. Yes, I believe she will get elected and the country will suffer as a result because of the liberal activist judges she will nominate to the Supreme Court.

I love baseball. In baseball, when you lose, you walk away and focus on the next game. Right wingers insist on arguing about the outcome of games they lost 20-years ago. Maybe if you guys would come up with new and better ideas, instead of trickle down poverty and high taxes/increased debt for the middle class, you might have a chance. The sun is setting on your reign. Look at America's changing demographics. After the redistricting in 2022 from the 2020 Census, you guys will be relevant only in the Whitest parts of Kentucky and similar places.

You pretty much summed up the goal of the DNC -- gain and stay in power. Too bad you guys aren't more concerned with prosperity of America. Instead you would rather tear down and ridicule success and make us dependent on the government. But when the government can no longer provide for all its dependents it will be just like Greece with riots in the streets. Have fun with your smug "we won" aditude but don't blame conservatives when we're all equally poor and destitute -- oh wait, that's what you do, blame others.

I can understand why you are a sore loser. The neocons and teapublicans promised you prosperity and world dominance and gave you the worst recession since the Great Depression and a worldwide terrorist movement with us in their cross hairs. Then, your obstructionists were unable to make Obama a one term President. They were willing to let the American economy fail, if it ruined Obama's legacy, and failed again. Now, they are on the edge of failing to beat a woman for the Presidency after decades of false accusations and smearing. And, how do you argue your position? More accusations and mud. Even your one attempt at substance, comparing us with Greece, shows little academic acuity. The US has the largest and richest economy in history. Greece is a minor economic player that borrowed its way into collapse and was forced into extreme austere policies. We have a history of working our way out of jams like this. We will again, if the Republicans start cooperating for the good of the country or when they lose all power. I'll let you guess which one is likely to come first.

We've gotten out of a $20 trillion and growing debt before? It's funny that you accuse Republicans of "high taxes" when it's the Democrats that want to raise taxes. And don't give me the BS about "tax cuts for the rich". Liberals must not understand basic math. A 5% tax cut means someone who makes $300K will get a $15,000 tax break while someone who makes 30K will "only" get a $1,500 tax break. When you cut taxes across the board, of course those who make more are going to save more. But Democrats like to play on the ignorance of the general public and use the dollar amounts to create envy and spite among its base so they'll accept higher taxes on themselves just so a 5% tax increase means the guy who makes $300k has to pay $15k while the guy who only makes $30k "gets a break" because he only has to pay $1.5k.
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad how ignorant people are.

Adrian Rogers said it best: “You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”

Since "winning" is so important to you I'll concede the argument so you can feel better about your political choices.