Skeptical Baby

I'm still waiting for them to call Hillary a liar. That won't happen, though.

I am sure she has lied. But that is a false equivalency. The sheer volume and frequency of Trump's lies are unrivaled in any arena. The man is nuts.

I'm not a Trump supporter; I was a Cruz supporter. However, I fail to see where trump is lying, with the exception of his calling himself a conservative.

What has Trump lied about ?

Do you really want a list? If you do, I will spoon feed you the data dump of the lies and you can fact check or snopes all of them, and they are confirmed factual lies. However, I think this will be like arguing with a creationist where they question the science behind the science and won't admit that disparate bodies of science support that the earth is billions of years old.

Snopes ? HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA Proven wrong by facts.And for the record The matter that makes up the earth can be billions of years old , but after being bombarded by unknown quantities of space radiation , particles and elements, There are factors unknown to science so some are just WAGS. Most Scientists I know believe in Creation because the odds of what is on earth species wise and the complex makeup cannot be calculated Mathematically! You may have evolved from A monkey , and it explains your support of Hillary !

Actually you don't know many or any scientists in this or any other relevant field. You could take the number of PHD scientists in relevant fields that believe in creationism and fit them in a bus. Creationism is so lazy. It's hard, we don't know, bam, god did it. You all are not only deplorable, but lazy, and fall for every con it seems. Trump has a predefined base. People that can fall for the biggest con, more likely to fall for his con. BTW scientists have calculated the number of species that have existed on earth and 99.99% are all extinct now...Who cares what you believe? You believe some copies of copies of unknown manuscripts allegedly from bronze age goat hearders from a mostly illiterate barbaric society are the words of some god. Stupid people look at complex things and make statements like you. Before you even think about it, just know that I have studied the bible with the best. BJU.

Einstein, Faraday , Newton, Galileo,Planck,Pascal, Descartes just to name a few all believed in God and Creationism. I guess if you studied the Bible , you didn't pay much attention because even archaeology has proven many things written in the Bible , In fact none have been disproven by anyone yet. I have worked side by side with some of the top scientists in physics and Earth Sciences from Top universities,Stanford, UAF, Cornell, the Naval Research lab, Air Force Research Lab, just to name a few and not one of those scientists denied Creationism. You seem to have a very closed mind which in the science field limits your ability to understand the realms of possibility. Smart people Like myself do research especially when it comes to politics and weigh evidence with an open mind.
You may not care what I believe , but I care about my fellow man and my country. Thats why I will vote for Trump and not lying Hillary...

So much fail.. Einstein- atheist. Pascal - well that is a wager. Galileo was persecuted by the church and charged for heresy because his discoveries did not jive with church dogma. And why are you bringing philosophers into this? Archaeology confirms that some of the places written about in the bible existed. On the other hand even Israeli archaeologists have come to the conclusion that the story line in Exodus is not true. The tribes of Israel were not enslaved by the Egyptians. Archaeology also disproves the global flood.. geology also disproves this story. You can't name one PHD/Professor from Stanford in a related field that believes in creationism. Not one. I would extend that to Cornell as well. You just made that up like trump would do. Supporting trump is the most unamerican thing you can do. But, its a free country. I just wish that being stupid was also very painful.

… a 2009 Pew Research poll put the percentage of scientists who believe in some form of deity or higher power at 51% (which, technically, as any scientist will tell you, is "most".)
Indeed, included in that Pew study: "... the poll of scientists finds that four-in-ten scientists (41%) say they do not believe in God or a higher power..."
Which is actually another way of saying that nearly 60% of scientists, in fact, do not reject the idea of religion, out-of-hand. This (unless I'm missing something...) would have to be regarded as a distinct majority of the scientific community.
Statistical data on Nobel prize winners in science between 1901 and 2000 revealed that atheists, agnostics, and freethinkers have won 7.1% of the prizes in chemistry, 8.9% in medicine, and 4.7% in physics; while Christians have won a total of 72.5% of the prizes in chemistry, 65.3% in physics, 62% in medicine and Jews have won 17.3% of the prizes in chemistry, 26.2% in medicine, and 25.9% in physics. Your Logic is flawed...Good day to you !

The stats are pretty much what I would have thought. However, the higher power part, and some form of deity would leave me to believe some portion of them are agnostics? I have zero research on this. Just a guess. My point was regarding young earth believers and creationists. I simply know that there are very few of these in academia. I am very open minded. However, if someone makes incredible claims, then they should be required to present evidence commensurate with the claim to be taken seriously. If there were proof of any gods existence, I would believe. Right now, the christian god has the same standing as Thor, Zeus, or Ra. The FSM has a slightly higher standing.. LOL... Bobby Henderson is a genius. Asking for credulity to accept something along with a threat for not accepting, (hell), on it's face is suspect. I am a bit of an OT expert and find the descriptions of god to be far too human and likely a construct or myth. I have enjoyed reading MANY versions of the OT ... some of the stories are better than anything hollywood can come up with. The NT, not so much. Paul bores me and I'm sure John was tripping while writing. Cheers!

Snopes is not factual. The fact you believe that is humorous.

Geology is all wrong because carbon dating is all wrong because the decay rate of isotopes is all wrong... yup.. seen this before.

Not really sure what you mean by that comment, but whatever.

Mooseman, dont try to reason with him, you're not the jack ass whisperer.

I think his problem is he tells too much of the truth.