CGI in 1969:

I believe you meant:

what is my ip then

blud im not your FBI agent💀

Cant find it. Carry on with the chain.

just copy and paste if it works

Mobile

oh.

No chain 4 u

No

New Spongebob spinoff lookin fire

yeah

Cgi didnt exist in 1969

that's his point

aw heck nah spunch blorp went 2 chernobyl

SPUNCHBOB!!11!!!1???!?!?!!!!11!

god the eel snatchin' spoingo???!?!?! 0_0z

1. why were there no stars in the background
2. how did the camera get there if neil armstrong was the first person on the moon
3. why was the flag blowing if there is no wind in space

lol

Actual answers:
1. the stars are so dim that the camera cannot gather enough of their light in a short exposure
2. They simply mounted a camera on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps
3. The flag was disturbed as it was planted into the ground and kept this bent shape because of the lack of strong gravity on the Moon

hmmm

ill stick to my conspiracies but thanks ig

Theres no dust when the tin foil lander hits the ground either.

exactly

1: There are no stars in the photo because there is no atmosphere to carry the light from the stars to our eyes in such a way that makes them visible.
2: A rover that has already landed on the moon (and survived) may already have a camera on it.
3: The flag was disturbed as it was planted into the ground and kept its bent shape because of the lack of strong gravity on the Moon.
Case closed, my way, oR ThE hIGhWay!

I didn't repost the comment, well maybe for the 3rd part, but otherwise it was more-or-less my work for the first 2 parts...

you just copied simplifiedmemes but ok

yay