Building 7 collapsed at freefall speed from structural damage and fire?

Building 7 collapsed at freefall speed from structural damage and fire? | image tagged in gifs,september 11,911,world trade center,building,conspiracy | made w/ Imgflip video-to-gif maker
2,122 views, 21 upvotes, Made by james3v6 2 weeks ago gifsseptember 11911world trade centerbuildingconspiracy
Make your own GIF
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
shrug | That's what they told us | image tagged in shrug | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups
"They" tell us a lot of things because the truth is dangerous to "their" system. What if I told you that the truth has nothing to do with "c | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
3 ups
Ancient Aliens Meme | ALIENS | image tagged in memes,ancient aliens | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Leonardo Dicaprio Cheers Meme | SOMETHING YOU AND I DEFINITELY AGREE ON | image tagged in memes,leonardo dicaprio cheers | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I don't know exactly what happened on 9/11 and I don't claim to. But the "official story" has numerous things in it. That just don't add up to me. Building 7 is one of those things.

Another is the claim that an amateur pilot supposedly descended rapidly towards the Pentagon, leveled off just above the ground, and hit the building perfectly, even though the surveillance footage they released to the public shows nothing discernible, just a blur then a fireball.
reply
1 up
numerous things in it that just don't add up*
reply
1 up
lol
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Why yes, it did. You know it can still be a false flag operation even if it was done only with planes. I guess rigging explosives in secret sounds more conspiratorial. I guess what I'm saying is that you can believe the experts about why the buildings fell and still think "the gubermint done it".
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
You are the one mentioning "false flag operations," "rigging explosives," "conspiracies," and "the gubermint." Do you believe any of that? I don't.

But I have never heard or read a satisfying answer as to how a tower which was not hit by a plane and only burned for a few hours fell at free-fall speed. The structural damage from the falling debris and subsequent fire (lasting only a few hours) should not have caused that collapse.

The fact that it did and the fact that type of collapse from fire and structural damage (especially at free-fall speed) has never been recorded in the history of recorded engineering is why the "expert" answers are unsatisfactory.

There was more at play on this day 17 years ago than "coincidence," "an anomaly in physics," and "conspiracies" can explain.
reply
1 up
I would also add that if anyone had actually worked around structural steel , you would see that it is completely impossible for it to fall from the causes that were given. It’s completely obvious to anyone who actually knows a thing or two about construction , that those buildings were brought down with charges.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Gotcha. Maybe take the event as experimental evidence itself? Yes, towers like that do fall they way they do when crashed into the way they were. Engineers thought that interesting too and I'm sure you can check out the analysis in published papers if you want. There could have been something else going on in those buildings I guess. The bottom line is that it seems reasonable that they could fall that way. Have to pay attention to evidence even if it is puzzling, I say.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/2bbeia.gif (click to show)
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Oh, but it WAS crashed into by WTC TOWER ONE!

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_hit_by_debris_.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html

https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/11-09-07/
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/248ebh.gif (click to show)
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
What's the matter James? Facts bothering you?

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_damage.html

http://skepticproject.com/images/articles/911-images/wtc7-fire-001.jpg

https://www.metabunk.org/sk/Notification_Center-20130605-142747.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2lRjdN8sHY
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/27hpg1.jpg (click to show)

Facts don't bother me at all but "elephant hurling" surely does.

Throwing a large amount of "evidence" which supposedly supports your position, only gives the impression of weighty evidence in your favor, but without demonstrating that all this "evidence" does indeed support your argument, all you have is an assumption that accumulating large amounts of "evidence" equals facts.

If you would have went one at the time I would have considered it.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
This "elephant hurling" claim is a load of crap, and is just another effort to dismiss the evidence.

https://www.metabunk.org/sk/imagejgrg-20130605-141955.jpg
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
If you want someone to argue with, next time don't start with fallacious reasoning. You can call my dismissing your fallacy a "load of crap" nevertheless: i.imgflip.com/1h6hi9.gif (click to show)
0 ups
Well, if you want to dismiss real truth and stick to the lies presented by the various factions of the "9/11 truth" movement, you should expect these kinds of responses.
Flip Settings
Make your own GIF

Created from video with the Imgflip Animated GIF Maker

youtube video source: youtu.be/Mamvq7LWqRU

Show embed codes
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback