I see you commenting on a lot of flat-earth memes, so I think it's safe to assume you want to convince flat-earthers that they are wrong. While I personally disagree with you and believe the flat-earth model to be a viable and sensible cosmology, let me give you a neutral piece of debate advice: saying something is proven proves nothing. If you truly intend to hold debates with flat-earthers, you must get specific. Tell us how it is proven. Give us experiments. Give us evidence and logic. Better debate skills on both sides of a disagreement will only help to lead everyone involved closer to the truth.
objects disappear when they go over the horizon
if earth were flat, you would be able to see anything on the planet from anywhere as long as another object wasn't blocking the light
Ok, well show us water sticking to a spinning ball. Also show the scientific method you used to prove your hypothesis of a spherical earth. Please note: 71% of your experimental sphere's surface must be covered with water. I will wait for your proven scientific method. GO!
Linear Visibility, Gyroscopes vs. Latitudinal Precession, Attitude Indicators, Hydrostatic Equilibrium, Periscopes, and Star Trails around Polaris to name a few
[image deleted]"What if I told you that everything you know ( ....everything you have been lead to believe) is a lie." This line does NOT exist in this reality
#MandelaEffect
