Clever: using the failed heliocentric meme to juxtapose a square flat Earth into fit their model. Unfortunately the models cannot and do not mutually exist. #NiceTry😂🤣😂🤣

To make “Observations, Measurements, and reasonable Inferences” from a unfathomable distances are mere conjecture as astronomers use Radio Telescope measurements which can ONLY reference astronomical distances. The distances claimed by modern science can be invariably scaled because they are based on Angular Size aka the APPARENT SIZE of the object in the sky! And geometry applied to arc distances only furthers evidence of #ScalingInvariance. Tell us how physics and natural science can be studied remotely OUTSIDE of NATURE?! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Girl: Whatever it is your smokin, please send me an ounce in the mail! 🤪
#OctaviaDerpity🤡

Astronomy: making estimations based on cyclical celestial events that observer has never physically been to, set foot on or touched.

And a warm reminder that natural science and Physics of Earth only works ON EARTH, so nice try but once again a #OctaviaDerpity #Spacetard fail.

Yes, I hold an internationally recognised license in a computer science related expertise. How about you?

#LogicalFallacy: hasty generalisation - grouping myself with “most flat earthers” while trying negate my understanding and body of knowledge in Kaku’s work. If what we call modern science’s understanding of the universe is off by 1 to the 120th power, your entire #globetard #HelioHoax argument becomes an inseparable part of the same fallible (and disprovable) heliocentric theory. I’m not losing much sleep either...unlike the misinformed souls who have been waiting for “SpaceTravel” to become a reality since 1965😴😴😴

Interesting indeed.