Variations on a common design because they come from a common Designer
"Biblical Creation Evidence
Pete Fiske · ·
"EVOLUTIONISTS CAN'T EXPLAIN WHY WE HAVE TWO ARMS AND TWO LEGS..
From Biblical Creation
In 2014, researchers at the University of Vienna and the Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research proposed an explanation.
According to their model, one reason vertebrates have only two pairs of limbs is that the developing gut limited where additional limbs could form.
In simple terms:
**Your gut got in the way.**
But does that really answer the question?
Not really.
It may attempt to explain why there aren't more limbs, but it does not explain why we have arms and legs in the first place.
Think about it.
Why does a human embryo develop two arms and two legs in exactly the right places?
Why do fish develop paired fins?
Why do birds develop two wings and two legs?
Why do these structures form with such precision every single time?
Saying the gut limited where limbs could form doesn't explain the origin of limbs. It simply proposes a restriction within a body plan that already exists.
That's like being asked where a house came from and answering, "The hallway determined where the bedrooms went."
Maybe it did.
But who designed the house?
The real mystery is not why there aren't more limbs.
The real mystery is why living things consistently develop the right limbs in the right places according to an incredibly precise plan.
From a creation perspective, that is exactly what we would expect. Arms, legs, wings, flippers, and fins reflect variations on a common design because they come from a common Designer.
The more we learn about life, the more we discover order, purpose, and planning woven into every stage of development.
"I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.""
https://answersingenesis.org/.../why-do-arms-and-legs...
"Shaun Chen’s China story hits the headlines. Media response: QUICK, SOMEBODY WRITE ABOUT POILIEVRE.
The Shaun Chen story is fascinating, strange and worthy of a LOT more questions.
Chen says he is resigning as the Liberal MP for Scarborough North because of significant health problems following a serious vehicle accident while travelling to Ottawa last fall. Reporting described his SUV as rolling off Highway 416 and ending up in a ditch. An OPP collision report has since been posted by journalist Glen McGregor confirming the collision occurred. (X (formerly Twitter))
So the accident is real.
But here is where the story gets weird.
Chen says the resulting health problems made travelling to Ottawa as frequently as an MP needs to difficult.
Yet from March 14 to March 22, he travelled all the way to China.
His office confirmed the trip. It says it was disclosed to the Ethics Commissioner and happened while Parliament was on break. The House returned March 23. And despite claims floating around online, there is no evidence he was secretly voting from China. That part appears false. (AM 800 CKLW)
But the China trip itself is real.
And it gets more interesting.
The trip was sponsored by the Hakka Canadian Association, chaired by Markham councillor Joe Li. Parliamentary IT apparently considered the China travel a “potentially high cybersecurity risk” and arranged a loaner tablet and temporary SIM for Chen. (CityNews Toronto)
Joe Li was also leading the Chinese Canadian Conservative Association when that organization publicly called for Pierre Poilievre to resign after the 2025 election. (The Bureau)
And in 2026, a Jamestown Foundation report mapping organizations it assessed as having connections to the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front system included the CCCA in its analysis. That does not prove Chen, Li or anyone else was taking orders from Beijing. But it certainly makes questions about these networks, relationships and travel legitimate. (Jamestown)"
JayGen 𝕏 er @JayGenXer
https://x.com/JayGenXer/status/2086150336864289012?s=20
"While Canadians were at the lake, the Liberals rammed Bill C-22 through.
166 Liberals voted to shut down debate.
Every other party voted no.
They gave the committee 30 minutes.
Thirty minutes to review a bill that rewrites Canada’s surveillance laws forever.
Then they rubber-stamped it and left for summer break.
Here’s what it does:
Phone and internet providers must store metadata on every single Canadian for a full year.
Who you contacted.
When.
From where.
Not suspects.
But Everyone.
Police say a year is “a good start.”
Experts say it creates a chill because it’s for any purpose, any data.
Signal and NordVPN have already said they may leave Canada over this.
This is why they wanted a majority.
So they can pass laws like this in the dark.
The Senate looks at it September 21.
There’s still time to fight it."
Ask the question: What is the Absolute Risk & the Relative Risk? Whenever Govt or Legacy Media try to scare you or promote Fear.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1688852822316570
As per the need to regulate & monitor all Canadians smart phone & internet because of the perceived wide abuse of children by online bullying & exploitation.
Or for example, HOT Summers & the need to regulate AC usage because of the electric gird strain.
I suspect this is another propaganda campaign to promote the Climate Cult's agenda to bankrupt the West & erode individual rights in controlling their own lives. Plus I'm suspect there is more strain on the electric grid by Massive Data Centers for AI as well as the potential growing demand that electric cars will put on the electic grid in summer and all year long.
Section 6 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the section of the Canadian Constitution that protects the mobility rights of Canadian citizens, and to a lesser extent that of permanent residents. By mobility rights, the section refers to the individual practice of entering and exiting Canada, and moving within its boundaries. The section is subject to the section 1 Oakes test, but cannot be nullified by the notwithstanding clause.
