Hm, I see your point! Once again, thanks for proving this, ahaha! (No one will ever have a proper conversation on this, so yeah!) I think you're right!

Hm, either way, he was still proven guilty, correct? So what you are suggesting is that the jury was biased towards Trump?

Did he not have this? He was given a lawyer, far judgement as well, was he not?

Why do you suggest it as "unconstitutional"? I might ask. And I apologize for my misunderstanding! I had mis interpreted your comment.

Actually, our government is relatively transparent (With a 2023 rating of 69%. And no, this wasn't some sort of "cover-up" as you are suggesting. The main question: Do we REALLY want a president who has been convicted 34 times of BUISNESS fraud, to take over the United States? Look, Trump is not a pleasant figure, he is dishonest, and doesn't watch his mouth. Besides being a straight off jerk, he is a powerful political man. Perhaps he should've chosen smarter individuals to fill his cabinet.