Then I'd be curious as to why the people who agree with what you said never call "grooming" on fundie schools (IBLP for example) that teach kids the earth is 6000 years old, that being sexually abused is somehow their fault, and keep them ignorant about how to get help if they're in danger within the church community

Two years and they still have no response, plus the comment has nothing to do with the image

And that should affect a fully-clothed wedding ceremony how?

Stop being obtuse. The pushback against gay marriage isn't arguing for it to be legal-only and not religious, it's arguing for it to not exist at all. If domain over marriage was "returned to the churches" then gay people wouldn't be allowed to marry under their rules. That's what the person you're responding to is pointing out.

Wrong. Nobody is claiming child trafficking doesn't exist. They're claiming that Q makes up imaginary targets and bullshit about ritual child sacrifice instead of focusing on the creepy youth pastor down the street

Also "hurrdurr you make funny face for one frame of video so you're wrong" is a toddler-level implication